Cases

MEMORANDUM DAVIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION As the gravamen of their principal claims in these cases, plaintiffs allege that their minor children suffered an increased risk of developmental harms and specifically, autism, which were proximately caused by the administration of various childhood vaccines containing the preservative thim-erosal, the composition of which contains mer

Case: 23-1027 Document: 77 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CQV CO., LTD., Appellant v. MERCK PATENT GMBH, Appellee ______________________ 2023-1027 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent an

236 F.Supp.2d 517 (2002) Angela OXENDINE, Plaintiff v. MERCK AND COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants Michael Renngli, Plaintiff v. Merck And Company, Inc., et al., Defendants David Hoggan, Plaintiff v. Merck And Company, Inc., Defendants James Whitfield, Plaintiff v. Merck And Company, Inc., Defendants Eduardo and Maria Camacho, Plaintiffs v. Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., et al., Defendants Angela Douglas,

Case: 25-1210 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 10/30/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MERCK SERONO S.A., Appellant v. HOPEWELL PHARMA VENTURES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2025-1210, 2025-1211 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SUNIL M. MALKANI, NICHOLAS ) MATARAGAS, and RED DRAGON ) PARTNERS, LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-1004-SG ) GEMMA CUNNINGHAM a/k/a ) GEMMA TURI, CHARLES D. R

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges the grant of summary judgment to one defendant, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (“Tenneco”), in an action seeking contribution toward environmental cleanup costs. These costs have been or will be incurred by plaintiff-appellant 1 Mor

381 F.2d 286 Beverly O'HARE, Appellant,v.MERCK & COMPANY, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, also knownas Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Appellee. No. 18581. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. July 19, 1967, Rehearing Denied Aug. 29, 1967. Harvey E. Skaar, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant. <

MURDOCK, Justice (dissenting). There is no good outcome in this case. In fairness to the main opinion, this Court has been put in a position from which it cannot give an answer that yields a just result for both plaintiffs and defendants in cases such as this. My understanding of certain bedrock principles of tort law and of the economic realities underlying those principles, however, compels me to dissent an

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded per the terms of Mr. Justice Baer’s responsive opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods., Inc., J-52B-2014, — Pa. -, 94 A.3d 350, 2014 WL 2723008 (Pa. June 16, 2014).1

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Justice SAYLOR. This case is among a number of civil actions brought by state attorneys general against pharmaceutical companies nationwide challenging the propriety of prescription drug pricing, in particular, as it impacts third-party reimbursement for brand-name drug purchases subsidized by government social welfare programs. The Commonwealth has ce

Case: 23-1864 Document: 93 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SHOCKWAVE MEDICAL, INC., Appellant v. CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Cross-Appellant COKE MORGAN STEWART, ACTING UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PASCAL METRICS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-01-175 MMJ CCLD ) HEALTH CATALYST, INC., ) ) Defendant. )

Case: 22-2299 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC., CARNAUDMETALBOX ENGINEERING LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. BELVAC PRODUCTION MACHINERY, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2022-2299, 2022-2300 _________

792 F.2d 330 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 6267 A.J. CUNNINGHAM PACKING CORP. and Chicago Dressed Beef Co.,Inc. and Continental Food Products, Inc. andFlorence Beef Company, Appellants,v.CONGRESS FINANCIAL CORPORATION and Philadelphia National Bank.PIERCE TRADING COMPANY, Appellant,v.CONGRESS FINANCIAL CORPORATION and Philadelphia National Bank. Nos. 85-3366, 85-3380.

*1234 REYNA, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we review Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions in three Covered Business Method (“CBM”) reviews. The decisions addressed the subject matter eligibility of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (“ ’850 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 6,871,325 (“ ’325 paten

Case: 23-1970 Document: 106 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PERCIPIENT.AI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, CACI, INC.-FEDERAL, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1970 ______________________ Appeal from the

OPINION NIX, Chief Justice. In this case we revisit an issue recently addressed in Palmeri v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, 508 Pa. 544, 499 A.2d 278 (1985), concerning the burden of proof required to terminate benefits under the Heart and Lung Act, Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477 as amended, 53 P.S. § 637 (hereinafter the “Act”). In Palmeri we determined

Cook, J. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the United States District Court certified the following question of law to this court: “Whether market share exists in Ohio as a viable theory of liability in a DES products liability action[?]” We respond in the negative: In Ohio, market-share liability is not an available theory of recovery in a products liability action.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 31, 2017 1 Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018 PUBLISHED J.M. and V.M., in their Own Right and as Best Friends of their Son, V.J.M., No. 02-10V Petitioners, Chief Special Ma

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: June 6, 2017 PUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * SHELAINE HARMON, * No. 12-298V * * Petitione