Cases

531 F.3d 679 (2008) ALPINE GLASS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY; Mid-Century Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-2021. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 16, 2008. Filed: July 9, 2008. *680 Eric J. Magnuson, argued, Diane B. Bratvold,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2021 ___________ Alpine Glass, Inc., * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Co

Joseph F. Cunningham, et al., v. Matthew Feinberg, No. 27, September Term, 2014 Labor & Employment—Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law—Lex Loci Contractus Wage claims arising from employment entered into in states other than Maryland are not excluded, for that reason alone, from being litigated under the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law (“MWPCL”), Labor & Employment, §§ 3-501 et. seq. The doctrine of lex loci contractus is not implicated, in the absence of an express choice of law

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM DAVID F. HAMILTON, Chief Judge. Introduction This patent infringement action is now before the court on the trial of the sole remaining claim, defendant’s counterclaim seeking to have the case declared “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285 so that defendant may recover its attorney fees incurred in the action. The

(2008) KNAUF FIBER GLASS, GMBH, Plaintiff, v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 1:02-cv-1215-DFH-WTL. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 24, 2008. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM DAVID F. HAMILTON, Chief Judge. Introduction This patent

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC17-1387 ____________ MARIE ANN GLASS, Petitioner, vs. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, etc., et al., Respondents. January 4, 2019 QUINCE, J. Marie Ann G

OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) protects only those individuals who are at least forty years of age. The question in this case is whether a disparate-impact claim is cognizable where a “subgroup” of employees at the upper end of that range — in this case, employees aged fifty and older — were alleged to have bee

831 N.E.2d 765 (2005) Thomas PELAK and Diane Kaye Pelak, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. INDIANA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., Pearson Education, Inc., and Prentice-Hall, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-0402-CV-119. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 25, 2005. *767 Ralph E. Dowling, Norris Choplin & Schroeder, LLP, Indianapolis,

ELANA CUNNINGHAM WILLS, Associate Justice. |, This is an appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denying a claim for additional benefits filed by appellant Bobby Stewart. After the court of appeals rendered its opinion in this case on April 22, 2009, appellee Arkansas Glass Container petitioned for review on the grounds that the court of appeals’ opinion was in conflict

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Court Facilitated Notice” (“the motion”). (Docket No. 88). The motion is ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification (Docket No. 88) is GRANTED, in part, in accord with the following.

769 N.W.2d 82 (2009) 2009 WI App 62 INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS and Quad Graphics, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC., Denzin Engineering, LLC, HK Systems, Inc., Rack Structures, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, OneBeacon Insurance Co., St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company and St. Paul Surplus Lines In

957 So.2d 1143 (2006) Valerie GLASS v. ANNISTON CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION. 2040725. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. October 27, 2006. *1144 Charles F. Norton, Alabama Education Association, Montgomery; William J. Miller of Turner & Miller, LLC, Anniston; and Sam Heldman of Gardner, Middle-brooks, Gibbons, Kittrell, Olsen, Wa

521 F.Supp.2d 166 (2006) Joseph N. CUNNINGHAM, Jr., M.D., Plaintiff, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and Christi Insurance Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 04 CV 2997(RJD)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 31, 2006. Opinion on Reconsideration September 28, 2007. *167

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

669 F.Supp. 757 (1987) Mary Ann CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and American Flint Glass Workers Union AFL-CIO, Defendants. Civ. A. No. A:86-0545. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. September 24, 1987. *758 Joseph W. McFarland, Redmond, McFarland & Hague, Parkersburg, W.Va.,

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-20-2003 Standard Bent Glass v. Glassrobots OY Preceden

358 So.2d 211 (1978) NAPLES AWNING & GLASS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. L.R. CIROU, Appellee. No. 77-1465. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 5, 1978. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1978. *212 Robert E. Doyle, Jr., Asbell, Hains & Doyle, Naples, for appellant. John

996 S.W.2d 437 (1997) MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Jeffrey GLASS; Garnett Doyle Glass; Brenda Glass; Gregg Y. Neal, Attorney; and Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Jeffrey Glass; and Motorists Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees. Jeffrey Glass; Garnett Doyle Glass; Brenda Glass; and Gregg Y. Neal, Cross-Appellants, v.

288 F.3d 83 In re FLAT GLASS ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL No. 1200).Brian S. Nelson, d/b/a Jamestown Glass Service; Mel's Auto Glass, Inc.; A. Waxman & Co., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Designer Windows, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Moses Moore All Glass Aspects, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; AAA Glass, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly si

42 Ill. App.3d 865 (1976) 356 N.E.2d 837 SHEFFIELD POLY-GLAZ, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUMBOLDT GLASS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. — (B.R. ABBOT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.) No. 62621. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed September 28, 1976. Donn E. Johnson, of Western Springs, for appella