Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cumulus Broadcasting LLC”
Sanford v. Cumulus Broadcasting, LLCpublic domain
Aff. Cir. Ct. (Okaloo-sa)
MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. The defendant Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC (“Cumulus”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.' 17), to which the plaintiff, Service Jewelry Repair,-Inc. (“Service Jewelry”), has filed a Response in-Opposition (Docket No. 22), and Cumulus has filed a Reply (Docket No. 25). For the following reasons, the motion will be granted.
Chires v. Cumulus Broadcasting, LLCpublic domain
(2008) Michael CHIRES, Plaintiff, v. CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 06-14971. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 13, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER SEAN F. COX, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for summary judgment. Both parties have briefed the iss
Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC v. Keadypublic domain
788 N.W.2d 433 (2010) CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark KEADY a/k/a Jay Deacon, Defendant-Appellant, and Warren Kluck, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 141209. COA No. 290112. Supreme Court of Michigan. September 27, 2010. *434 Order On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe
DEBRA SANFORD, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO v. FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED CASE NO. 1D15-5117 LIABILITY COMPANY, STAR BROADCASTING, INC., GULF COAST BROADCASTING CO
638 S.E.2d 12 (2006) CUMULUS BROADCASTING, LLC, Petitioner, v. HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent. No. COA06-182. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 5, 2006. Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Derek J. Allen and Katherine A. Murphy, Greensboro, for petitioner-appellee. Garris Neil Yarborough, Fayetteville, for r
Cumulus Radio Corp. v. Olsonpublic domain
ORDER & OPINION JOE BILLY McDADE, United States Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) (Doc. 3). Plaintiff filed a Verified Complaint and moved for a TRO on February 9, 2015. (Docs. 1, 3). The Court received written submissions from all parties and heard oral argument on February 12, 2015. For the reasons explained b
Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. Shimpublic domain
226 S.W.3d 366 (2007) CUMULUS BROADCASTING, INC.[1] et al. v. Jay W. SHIM et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. April 27, 2007. *370 Douglas Ray Pierce and Jeremy Wayne Parham, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Phoenix of Hendersonville, Inc. and Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. James Carson Hofstetter, Nashville, Tennessee, for
26-88 Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc. v. The Nielsen Co. (US), LLC United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: May 7, 2026 Decided: July 13, 2026 No. 26-88 CUMULUS MEDIA NEW HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
Leslie v. Cumulus Media, Inc.public domain
ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docs. 39, 40, 41, 48), Defendants Cumulus Media, Inc. and Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC’s Response (Doc. 49), and Plaintiffs Reply (Doc. 58); Defendants Cumulus Media, Inc. and Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC’s’ motion for summary judgment (Docs. 43, 44, 45), Plaintiffs Response (Docs. 50, 5
Talk Radio Network Enterprises v. Cumulus Media Inc.public domain
ORDER AIKEN, District Judge: On May 2, 2017, Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (# 67), and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiffs have filed Objections (# 75), Defendants, have responded to Plaintiffs’ Objections. (# 76) and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1); McDonnell Do
Centennial Broadcasting, LLC v. Burnspublic domain
433 F.Supp.2d 730 (2006) CENTENNIAL BROADCASTING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Gary E. BURNS and 3 Daughters Media, Inc., Defendants. No. 6:06 CV 00006. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. June 8, 2006. *731 *732 James Bennett Kinsel, Jerry William Boykin, Melissa Gunthner F
11/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 22, 2021 Session BUTTERCUP RIDGE FARMS, LLC, ET AL. v. McFALL SOD & SEEDING, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Maury County No. 19-293 Christoph
Phillips v. Dickeypublic domain
William H. Phillips, the plaintiff in an action in the Mobile Circuit Court alleging civil conspiracy and tortious interference with a business relationship, appeals from summary judgments in favor of Ken Johnson, .Com +, L.L.C., 1 Lew Dickey, Cumulus Licensing, L.L.C., Cumulus Broadcasting, L.L.C., and Cumulus Media, Inc. Because the Mobile Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction of the matter, we vacate the summary judgments, dismiss this
145 F.Supp.2d 1316 (2001) SOUTHERN BROADCAST GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GEM BROADCASTING, INC., and Joseph D. Farish, Jr., Defendants. No. 6:00-cv-484-Orl-31JGG. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 7, 2001. *1317 *1318 Asher Rabinowitz, FL, for Plaintiff. R
491 F.Supp.2d 1123 (2007) QANTUM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. STAR BROADCASTING, INC., a Florida corporation, and Ronald E. Hale, Sr., Defendants. No. 05 21772 CIV United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. June 8, 2007. *1124 *1125 John O'
The Pen v. DC Radio Assets, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [3] BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on a Motion to Dismiss [3] (“Mot. Dismiss”) brought by Defendants DC Radio Assets, LLC and Cumulus Media Inc. Plaintiff The Pen1, proceeding pro se, claims
In re Rexford Properties LLCpublic domain
OPINION RE: CLASSIFICATION AND IMPAIRMENT Martin R. Barash, United States Bankruptcy Judge Rexford Properties LLC, debtor and debtor in possession herein (“Rexford” or the “Debtor”), requests pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3013 (“Rule 3013”) an order: (i) approving a proposed classification scheme for nonpri-ority unsecured claims under a prospective plan of reorganization for Rexford, a
Gelfand v. Metropolitan Life Insurancepublic domain
ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael H. Gelfand participated in an employee welfare benefit plan (“the Plan”) sponsored by his employer, defendant Citadel Broadcasting Company (“Citadel”),1 and established pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Me
473 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2007) QANTUM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. STAR BROADCASTING, INC., a Florida corporation, and Ronald E. Hale, Sr., Defendants. No. 05-21772-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. February 9, 2007. *1250 John O'Sullivan and Jason Kellogg of Hogan &a;