Cases

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. WELLER NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

290 A.2d 842 (1972) Gertrude L. WELLER, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a New York corporation, and General Electric Company, a New York corporation, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Third-Party Defendant. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle. March 16, 1972.

201 B.R. 586 (1996) In re Lawrence B. CUMMINGS, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96-33413-BKC-SHF. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. October 17, 1996. *587 Patricia Redmond, Stearns, Weaverm Miller, Weissler, Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Debtor. Jeffrey D. Fisher, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Susan Cummin

271 Md. 420 (1974) 318 A.2d 193 WELLER, ETC. ET AL. v. SOKOL ET AL., TRUSTEES UNDER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ARTHUR NATTANS [No. 221, September Term, 1973.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 15, 1974. Motion for rehearing filed May 6, 1974. Denied May 7, 1974. Motion for rehearing filed May 1

351 Mich. 50 (1957) 87 N.W.2d 134 WELLER v. MANCHA. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 47,140. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided December 24, 1957. Rehearing granted April 14, 1958. Allaben, Davids & Massie, for plaintiff. Luyendyk, Hoiner, Hillman, Karr & Dutcher, for defendants.

353 Mich. 189 (1958) 91 N.W.2d 352 WELLER v. MANCHA. Docket No. 97, Calendar No. 47,140. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided July 15, 1958. *191 Allaben, Davids & Massie (Sam F. Massie, Jr., of counsel), for plaintiff. Luyendyk, Hainer, Hillman, Karr & Dutcher (Douglas

1 Reported in 152 P.2d 957. This is an appeal by the defendants E.R. Weller and the marital community consisting of himself and his wife, judgment debtors in the action, from an order denying their motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment after judgment and simultaneously allowing plaintiff recovery against the garnishee defendant in an amount found to be owing by the garnishee to the d

STALEY, Circuit Judge. These cases present identical questions of law, 1 namely, whether the Tax Court erred in holding that certain transactions involving prepayment of interest on annuity contract loans lacked substance so as not to be deductible as interest payments under Section 23(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of

GRONER, C. J. This is a suit against the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Treasurer of the United States, officially and individually, to obtain the distribution of a fund in excess of a million dollars, now in the United States Treasury and earmarked — “Proceeds, distilled spirits industry, parity payments”. The fund was accumulated under the following circumstances. In 1933 Congress passed the A

Potter, Chiee Justice. This case, which is here on error, was tried in the District Court on appeal from a justice’s court. The action was originally brought by the plaintiff in error, E. N. Campbell, in the court of J. E. Hoop, a justice of the peace in Sheridan county, to recover of the defendant in error, A. D. Weller, the sum of $65.00 claimed to be due for the hire of a livery team and 'buggy. The defendant filed a motion a

The plaintiff's decedent while riding in an automobile driven easterly on the Post Road in Darien by his wife who, as executrix of his will, is the plaintiff herein, was killed as a result of a collision between it and the named defendant's motor truck being driven westerly by its agent, the defendant Roberts. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff against both defendants, who have appealed, relying upon claimed errors in the court's charge to the jury, its rulings on evidence, and imp

314 F.2d 598 Paul Rodger WELLER, Appellant,v.Fred H. DICKSON et al., Appellees.Andrew Emmitte POPE, Appellant,v.Richard A. McGEE et al., Appellees. No. 17606. No. 17450. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. February 15, 1963. Rehearing Denied in No. 17450 March 29, 1963.

431 F.3d 141 In re: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Clara Clark, Linda Smart and all other class members represented by Fleming & Associates, L.L.P., AppellantsHariton & D'Angelo, LLP and Napoli, Kaiser, Bern & Associates, LLP, on behalf of themselves, claimant James Axford and similarly situated class members represented by the Hariton and Napoli Firms whose claims are affected by

BOLIN, Justice. Del Marsh, Gerald Dial, Jay Love, and Chad Fincher (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the defendants”) were members of the Alabama Legislature during its 2013 Regular Session. The defendants seek a writ of mandamus ordering the Montgomery Circuit Court to set aside its order denying their motion to dismiss an action against them filed by Lynn Pettway and to enter an order granting the motion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER E. THOMAS BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is the defendant’s motion to compel the production of certain documents that the plaintiff has withheld on the basis of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product. The defendant asserts that plaintiff has waived its right to claim privilege over the withheld documents. The plaintiff argues th

SHAW, Justice (concurring in part and concurring in the result in case nos. 1130987 and 1131021). I concur as to Parts III, V, VI, VII, and VIII. For the reasons discussed below, I concur in the result as to Parts I, II, IV, IX, and X. I also concur to affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to intervene filed by the scholarship parents. Part I holds that the later legislative de

870 S.W.2d 556 (1993) James F. SRITE and Erma M. Srite; James H. Bell and Mickey Bell; Estate of Otis Burt, Mable Burt, Ronald Burt, Kathy Hunter, and Gloria Polumbo, Appellants, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Fibreboard Corporation, and Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Appellees, Raymond JOCHIM and Mary Jochim; Clarence Ben and Ednora Ben; Erma Rae Friley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Joseph Friley; James Morris and Helen Mor

634 F.Supp. 1121 (1986) CHILD WORLD, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOUTH TOWNE CENTRE, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. C-3-8629. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. April 17, 1986. *1122 Charles J. Faruki, John E. Tate, Dayton, Ohio, Robert R. Weller, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff. Roger J. Makley, John A. Cumming, Dayton,

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/20/2023 09:06 AM CDT - 49 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE V. JANIS Cite as 32 Neb. App. 49 State of Nebraska,

654 F.Supp. 966 (1987) Terry Whitman SHOULTES and Executive Art Studio, Inc., d/b/a Velvet Touch Bookstore, Plaintiff, v. Michael S. SZEKELY, et al., Defendants. No. K86-490 CA4. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan. February 5, 1987. Brussow & Krause, P.C. by Franklin Richard Brussow, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiffs. Dietrich, Zody & Walton by