Cases

SWANSON, J. We have for review two consolidated appeals both arising from two orders, each denying • appellants’ motions to vacate judgments awarding “prevailing party” appellate attorneys’ fees to appellee, Crystal Harrington, For the following reasons, we reverse. In 2012 this Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a final summary judgment favorable

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, CERTIFICATION PER CURIAM. Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, or, Alternatively, Certification, is denied. LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR; SWANSON, J„ CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART, WITH OPINION.

561 N.E.2d 321 (1990) 203 Ill. App.3d 377 149 Ill.Dec. 43 Zona HOUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karen SWANSON, Defendant-Appellee Wesley Keown, Defendant. No. 2-90-0124. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. September 25, 1990. John Munday, Lane & Munday, Frank Leonard LaPort, Frank Leonard LaPort & A

Cox, J. ¶1 James Vincent Swanson appeals his judgment and sentence for his conviction of indecent exposure with sexual motivation, claiming that he was denied a fair trial because of prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct. In closing, the prosecutor misstated the law in arguing what the State was required to prove to convict Swanson of the crime. The trial court overruled Swanson’s timely objection to this misstatement. But the mi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1997 Filed April 10, 2024 HEATHER LORRAINE SWANSON, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, Bethany Currie, Judge. Heather Swanson appeals the district court’s denial of her application for p

197 Ill. App.3d 592 (1990) 555 N.E.2d 35 PAUL SWANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE VILLAGE OF LAKE IN THE HILLS et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-89-0654. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed May 9, 1990. *593 *594

598 N.E.2d 430 (1992) 233 Ill. App.3d 58 174 Ill.Dec. 233 Paul D. SWANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. The VILLAGE OF LAKE IN THE HILLS, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 2-91-1260. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. August 14, 1992. *431 Michael

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Paul Swanson filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Village of Lake in the Hills (LITH), the LITH Police Commission, and various LITH officials, alleging that disciplinary actions taken against him in his capacity as sergeant on the LITH police force violated his right to due process. He also sought relief on the state law ground of invasion of privacy. The district court granted the defenda

MEYER, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Contrary to our longstanding rules of statutory interpretation that require a strict construction of statutes in abrogation of the common law, the majority adopts an expansive interpretation of the word “payments” in the collateral-source statute, MinmStat. § 548.251 (2008), which extends beyond the plain meaning to a negotiated discount between the plaintif

80 So.3d 1113 (2012) Crystal CHISHOLM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D11-4994. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 27, 2012. Crystal Chisholm, pro se, Petitioner. *1114 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. The amended petitio

145 P.3d 886 (2006) STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duane SWANSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 27120. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i. October 11, 2006. *887 Jon N. Ikenaga, Deputy Public Defender, on the briefs, for defendant-appellant. Arleen Y. Watanabe, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, County of Maui, on the

PER CURIAM. Appellant claims that the trial court committed reversible error in granting the Department’s motion for an injunction to prevent child abuse pursuant to section 39.504, Florida Statutes (2012), because (1) the court lost jurisdiction after the adoption of the children; (2) the adoptive parent was not served with the motion in violation of her due process rights; and (3) the court failed to hold an evidentiary he

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Sep 23 2019, 8:41 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata,

PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm except for the summary denial of appellant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for moving to consolidate two cases charging appellant with committing sexual offenses against two different victims. As to that claim, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. In his postconviction m

68 P.3d 265 (2003) 187 Or. App. 477 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michelle Lee SWANSON, Appellant. C993911CR; A113676. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 31, 2002. Decided May 8, 2003. *266 Susan F. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With

SWANSON, J., Associate Judge. The State of Florida appeals the trial court’s final order granting Joseph Miller’s motion to dismiss the information charging him with sexual battery without personal injury, in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (2012). We have jurisdiction, see Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1)(A), and, for the reasons that follow, we reverse. The informati

PER CURIAM. The petition is granted and David Tice is hereby afforded belated appeal from the order of the Circuit Court in and for Leon County denying postconviction relief in case numbers 2008 CF 01531A, 2008 CF 03838A, and 2008 CF 04044A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the circuit court who shall treat it as a *541<

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. THOMAS and SWANSON, JJ., concur. BENTON, C.J., dissents with opinion.

SWANSON, J. This is an appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice a Motion for Relief from Judgment Terminating Mother’s Parental Rights and Amended Motion to Vacate and Set Aside the Consent to Adoption. The mother, F.R., asserts the dismissal of her motions was erroneous in that her consent to the adoption of her infant son was not knowingly and voluntarily entered; that the consent was obtained by dures

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON V.» ' STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69618-1- Respondent, DIVISION ONE ts: CO v. PUBLISHED JAMES VINCEN