Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. This case concerns the Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”) obligation to protect land allotments under the Federal Lands Policy Management Act (“FLPMA”), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq. Plaintiffs, a conservation group and two of its individual members, filed a complaint allegin

172 F.3d 1141 83 A.F.T.R.2d 99-1912, 99-1 USTC P 50,464,99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2760,1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3609 John CRYSTAL; Victoria Crystal; John Crystal Pools, Inc.,Petitioners-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 97-56204. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submi

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case concerns the way in which plaintiff Fred Moore's employer responded when Mr. Moore, who is African-American, complained that one of his customers *1152repeatedly called him a "nigger." Mr. Moore asserts that the customer's behavior was intolerable because the customer demeaned h

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MCFADDEN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COUR

Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe appeals the judgment of the District Court, Water Division No. 4 (the water court) denying and dismissing with prejudice Arapahoe County's applications for decrees for conditional water rights for the Union Park Reservoir Project (the Project)-a large water storage project west of the Continental Divi

02/25/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 14, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CRYSTAL L. GREGOIRE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lawrence County No. 33670 Russell Parkes, Judge ___________________________________

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., HODGES and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 5, 202

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ' CRYSTAL BROOKE KELLY, No. 08-11-00164-CR ' Appellant, Appeal from ' v.

*424Rivera, J. (concurring and dissenting in part). In this appeal, petitioner Crystal Hawkins presents the Court with a question of statutory construction which the majority has ill-advisedly chosen to avoid. In my opinion, the posture of the case requires that we resolve her claim that resp

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 18, 2013 Decided December 3, 2013 No. 12-1158 SOUTHWEST POWER POOL, INC., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS On Petition for Review of Orders of

Per Curiam: This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The circuit court referred the matter to the master in equity for recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law. The master concluded, as a matter of law, that New Concepts’ lien was untimely perfected and is, therefore, invalid. New Concepts excepted to the master’s report. The circuit court modified the master’s report, entering a finding that the

763 F.Supp.2d 1371 (2011) IN RE: CRYSTAL POOLE IRS SUMMONS LITIGATION. Crystal Poole v. United States of America, et al., N.D. California, C.A. No. 3:10-2668 Crystal Poole v. United States of America, et al., N.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:10-501. MDL No. 2216. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. February 3, 2011. Before JOHN G. HEYBURN

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. “WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: This dispute between two regional transmission organizations (“RTOs”) turns on the interpretation of a single contract provision. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission resolved the conflict against petitioner Southwest Power Pool (“SPP”). Applying both th

PER CURIAM. Crystal Creek Homeowners Association (Crystal Creek) and Ernest H. Cockrell (jointly, the objectors) appeal from a judgment of the District Court for Water Division 4 (water court) denying them an award of costs under C.R.C.P. 54(d) after they successfully opposed applications for decrees determining conditional water rights filed by the Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County (Arapahoe) and its predec

KONDUROS, J.: *784**146Suncrete of Carolina, Inc. appeals the circuit court's order altering the previous circuit court order, which had granted Suncrete's motion to modify the arbitration award on the basis that the arbitrator erroneously relied on South

696 F.Supp. 621 (1988) ROBARB, INCORPORATED, a Georgia corporation, Plaintiff, v. POOL BUILDERS SUPPLY OF THE CAROLINAS, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Pool Builders Supply of the Carolinas, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, d/b/a Crystal Clear Chemical and Olen E. Morgan, individually, Defendants. No. 1:87-CV-2102-HTW. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

398 B.R. 23 (2008) In re CRYSTAL CASCADES CIVIL, LLC, Debtor. Richard H. Buenting, an Individual; and Road & Highway Builders, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. Crystal Cascades Civil, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; Business Bank of Nevada, a Nevada corporation; the Internal Revenue Service; and The Gore Family Trust, Howard L. Gore and Kimberly Hawkins-Gore, Trustees, Defendants. Bank

OPINION NICKELL, Judge: Underlying these three related appeals are three commercial equipment and furniture leases Kentuckiana Medical Center, LLC (“KMC”)6 entered into with The Leasing Group Pool, II LLC (“LGP”)7 in June and September 2009, and on which KMC defaulted in 2010. The real focus of these appeals, ’ however, is two personal guar

MEMORANDUM ** Crystal Ann Poole appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the government for assessing federal income taxes. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, Brunette v. Humane Soc’y of Ventura County, 294 F.3d 1205, 1209 (9th Cir.2002), we affirm. We affirm the