Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 18-3271 ___________ CRYSTAL STARNES v. BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 50th Judicial District; THOMAS DOERR, individually; THOMAS HOLMAN, individually Thomas Doerr, Appellant

In re Butler, Crystal; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 495-594; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0042. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURTNEY CATES; BRIAN STOVER; JASON MILLER, on ┐ behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants,

OPINION CRONE, Judge. Case Summary Crystal Valley Sales, Inc. (“Crystal Valley”) 1 appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its civil conspiracy claims against National Sales Company, Inc., Rodger Anderson, Cameo Manufacturing, Inc., and Norm Geible (collectively “Appellees”) for failure to state a claim.2 Crystal Valley contends th

*482 ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. The Court has pending before it Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 118). The Court has reviewed the briefs and the applicable law and now issues this Order and Reasons. I. Background This employment case ar

Gordon McCloud, J. ¶27 (dissenting) — The developer here dedicated a 25-foot easement to Snohomish County *680(County) “for the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of maintaining and operating stormwater facilities.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 46-48 (emphasis omitted). The city of Bothell (City) accepted this dedication, along with its obligations. CP at 45. The questio

ORDER HOLMES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Intervening Plaintiff, the United States (Docket # 32), Plaintiff Crystal Bay Marina (Docket #36), Intervening Defendant Crystal Bay Estates (Docket #37), and Defendants Bill Sweeden, G.H. “Jess” Ballard, Virgil Williamson, and Bill McBee (collectively referred to herein as “Commissioners”)

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 202 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No.CV-16-1063 Opinion Delivered: April 5, 2017 CRYSTAL BUTLER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 70JV-13-271] ARKANSAS

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 235 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-21-360 Opinion Delivered May 18, 2022 KYU HWAN HWANG APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI V. C

06/03/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 4, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CRYSTAL MICHELLE RICKMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 19-744 Donald H. Allen, Judge _________________________________

339 S.E.2d 917 (1986) Brenda Darlene McGREGOR v. CRYSTAL FOOD CORPORATION, Employer and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Insurer. Record No. 0429-85. Court of Appeals of Virginia. Argued October 10, 1985. Decided February 18, 1986. *918 Julia H. Butler (Ashcraft & Gerel, Alexandria, Va., on brief), for ap

KAROHL, Presiding Judge. Widow and children of John Canady appeal summary judgment granted defendant Crystal Development Corporation [Crystal] and defendant Manlin & Liebert Builders, Inc., [Manlin & Liebert]. Plaintiffs’ action is based upon a wrongful death suit arising from injuries resulting in the death of John Canady, a carpenter who fell while working as an employee of Leo Echele Drywall, Inc., [Echele]. Defen

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 517 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-17-444 Opinion Delivered: October 4, 2017 CRYSTAL BUTLER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 70JV

PER CURIAM: Leroy White, an African-American male, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Crystal Mover Services, Inc. (CMSI) in his race-based employment discrimination and retaliation suit, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. White raises several issues on appeal, which we address in turn. After de novo review,1 we affirm the district court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-00240-SCT TAJARVIS HAYMON AND CRYSTAL PERNELL v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/09/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BARRY W. FORD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: AKILLIE MALONE OLIVER SHARON ALGENA SPENCER ALVA PEYTON TAYLOR

Gregory, Justice: This is an action for child custody brought by the child’s paternal grandmother, appellant Sallie Snider. Appellant appeals from that part of the trial judge’s order requiring her to pay Three Hundred and Fifty ($350.00) Dollars towards respondent Teri L. Butler’s attorney’s fee. We reverse. Appellant commenced this action after respondent Gary P. Butler, her son, left the state of Washingt

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner, Reginald Butler (“Butler”), challenges his conviction for rape in the Massachusetts Superior Court sitting in and for the County of Suffolk. He brings two claims: (1) that the eleven- and-a-half-year delay between the issuance of a criminal complaint in 1

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS Dee Benson, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Marvin Butler’s (“Butler” or “Defendant”) Motion to Suppress. (Dkt. No. 28.) On December 8, 2015, the Court heard oral argument on Butler’s Motion. Steven Killpack represented Butler. Lake Dishman and Jared

Opinion issued January 23, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00397-CR ——————————— JIMMY LEE BUTLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal f

Joseph Stracke, et al. v. Estate of Kerry Butler, Jr., et al., No. 64, September Term 2018. Opinion by Hotten, J. SURVIVAL AND WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION – GROSS NEGLIGENCE – SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE – The Court of Appeals held that Respondents failed to present sufficient evidence at trial that Petitioners’ conduct amounted to gross negligence, and that the trial judge did not err in granting Petitioners’ motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict. “[G]ross negligence is an intentional failure to p