Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ROBERT WALLACE, Petitioner, v. HON. JAMES D. SMITH, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Respondent Judge, CHRISTIAN NAVA CRUZ, A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL; IMPALA ENTERPRISES L.L.C., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, DBA EL TUBO TUBO,

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, January 20, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26I0108. JACQUELYN SMITH et al v. FLAVIO BRANDON CRUZ. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge Plaintiff appeals from a denial of disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). The action is one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the Commissioner’s final determination. On January 25, 2013, plaintiff filed applications for a period of disability and disability insuran

Opinion SMITH, J. —Daniel Blea Cruz, Jr., was convicted of three counts of committing a lewd act against a child under age 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)),1 and sentenced to 105 years to life in prison. He argues in this appeal that the jury was given an erroneous instruction on the use of Evidence Code section 1108 evidence to show a propensity to commit sex offenses. He says t

OPINION YVONNE RODRIGUEZ, Justice For nearly three years now, as part of a modernization effort mandated by the Texas Supreme Court, the courts of this state have undergone a slow but steady transition from paper filings to electronic filings in civil cases. As part of this transition, service rules have changed, and now in most civil cases, all filings must go through the Office of Court Administration’s

TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE *223Erick Cruz ("Defendant") moves this Court to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the interception of wire communications. For the reasons stated below, Defendant's motion (Docket No. 110) is denied. Background

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered August 28, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]), defendant

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered August 28, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]), defendant

SHORE, J. Defendant- appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. After being arrested on a probation violation, an officer found methamphetamine in a folded piece of paper in defendant’s wallet during an inventory of defendant’s possessions. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence that the officer found in t

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Rudolfo R. Miramontes, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations arising out of his placement in protective custody at the Santa Clara County Jail while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Nev. Dep’t of Corrs. v. Greene,

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT Honorable" Larry Alan Burns, United States District Judge “There are good reasons not to call an opponent’s argument ‘ridiculous.’” “The reasons include civility; the near-certainty that’overstatement will only push the reader away ... and that, even where the record supports an extreme modifier, the better practice is usually to lay out the facts and let the court reach

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Defendant, Hector Antonio Cruz-Mercedes, was charged in a multi-count indictment alleging a conspiracy to obtain income tax refunds fraudulently from the United States Treasury by filing materially false income tax forms. Mr. Cruz-Mercedes moved [Dkt. No. 57] to suppress evidence seized by the Government as a result of what he contends was an unlawful arrest on Ju

HUNSTEIN, Justice. Appellant Eduardo De La Cruz was tried and convicted of the murder of Brenda Gibbs.1 On appeal, Appellant claims four instances of trial court error and two claims of error by the motion for new trial court. We affirm. Viewed in a light most favorable to the jury's verdict, the evidence adduced at trial established that, at all relevant times, Appellant and the victim,

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendants, who are state officials, appeal a preliminary injunction against the *597 enforcement of a Texas statute prohibiting the harboring of illegal aliens. Because the plaintiffs lack Article III standing, we reverse and render a judgment of dismissal.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Os-waldo Sanchez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of th

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Cruz-Rosario has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Rosario has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant p

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Gabriel Heriberto Cruz-Romero appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. He argues that the government breached the plea agreement by opposing a safety valve adjustment to his sentence. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss Cruz-Romero’s appeal as barred by the appeal waiver in the p

691 S.E.2d 47 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Rajohn Almann CRUZ. No. COA09-386. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 6, 2010. *48 Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Defendant-Appellant. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Sandra Wallace-Smith, for the State. STEPHENS, Judge. R

González Rivera, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA En los recursos consolidados en el epígrafe, comparece Luis Angel Cruz Cruz, un incapacitado representado por su defensor judicial, licenciado Harold Vicente. En el recurso KLAN-01-00282 solicitan la revisión y revocación de una sentencia parcial emitida el 22 de enero de 2001. Mediante el referido dictamen, el