Cases

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Antonio Sanchez Ochoa is currently in Yakima County Department of Corrections’ (DOC) custody on state criminal charges. He alleges that he is unable to post bail on his state criminal charges because Defendants Director Ed Campbell, Chief S

10541041910 00 Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston Order Case number: 01-12-01055-CV Style: In re Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Pinnacle Project Services, Inc., Jeffrey A. Liggett, and Terence F. Townend, Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Raymond G. Houde v. Pinnacle Engineering, Inc., Pinnacle Project Serv

10541041910 00 Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston Order Case number: 01-12-01055-CV Style: In re Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Pinnacle Project Services, Inc., Jeffrey A. Liggett, and Terence F. Townend, Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Raymond G. Houde v. Pinnacle Engineering, Inc., Pinnacle Project Serv

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Harrison, Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-4465.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical

75 So.3d 876 (2011) STATE of Louisiana v. Larry ROCHON. No. 2011-KA-0009. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 25, 2011. *878 James D. Caldwell, Attorney General, Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Matthew Caplan, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellant. Orleans Public Defenders, Emily Voshell, for Appellee.

CYR, Circuit Judge. Appellant Gerónimo Pizarro-Calderon (“Pizarro”) contends that the district court erred in refusing to suppress six block-like articles — packaged in opaque beige and brown tape — which ultimately led to his conviction for possessing cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1993). We reverse. I

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1096 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

874 S.W.2d 634 (1993) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Terry Lee SHROPSHIRE and Arthaniel Ladle Womble, Appellants. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville. August 25, 1993. Permission to Appeal Denied February 28, 1994. *636 R. Chris Albright, Chattanooga, for appellant Shropshire. Ardena J. Garth, Dist. Publ

TANG, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur wholeheartedly in the majority’s judgment and I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it goes. I write separately to emphasize my belief that the liberty interest at issue — freedom from governmental detention and restraint — is a fundamental right expressly protected by the fifth amendment to the Constitution. Indeed, freedom from governmental restraint is the

OPINION TERRY JENNINGS, Justice. Relators, Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (“PEI”), Pinnacle Project Services, Inc. (“PPSI”), Jeffery A. Liggett, and Terence F. Townend, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order in the underlying case 1 requiring that they turn ov

942 F.2d 1352 60 USLW 2125 Jenny Lisette FLORES, a minor, by next friend Mario HughGALVEZ-MALDONADO; Dominga Hernandez-Hernandez, a minor, bynext friend Jose Saul Mira; Alma Yanira Cruz-Aldama, aminor, by next friend Herman Perililo Tanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Edwin MEESE, III; Immigration & Naturalization Service;Harold Ezell, Defendants-Appellants. No. 88-62

801 S.W.2d 899 (1990) Brent Thomas GORDON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 560-89. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. December 12, 1990. *901 C.E. Clover, Jr., Sealy, for appellant. Peter C. Speers, III, Dist. Atty., and Thomas D. Glenn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conroe, Robert Huttash, State's Atty, Aus