Cases

JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge. Janet Trainor appeals final summary judgments granted to PNC Bank, National Association (PNC), Kirby Brothers Construction, Inc. (Kirby) and Lee Williams & Associates, Inc. (Williams), collectively Ap-pellees, in her action for damages for the alleged injuries she suffered when she stepped into a pothole in a parking lot serving customers of PNC

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0941 ══════════ PNC Mortgage, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A. Successor to National City Bank and National City Mortgage, a Division of National City Bank of Indiana, Petitioner, v. John Howard and Amy Howard, Respondents ══

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, PNC Bank, National Association’s (“PNC[’s]”) Motion for Summary Final Judgment ... (“Motion”) [ECF No. 104], together with a Statement of Material Facts (“Defendant’s SMF”) [ECF No. 103], both filed on February 19, 2013. Plaintiffs, Dantzler, Inc. and Dantzler Trade, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or

642 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2009) Alicia FORTALEZA, Plaintiff, v. PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 09-2004 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 27, 2009. *1016 Brian D. McFarlin, Henry Chuang, Lawrence Pedro Ramirez, The Litigation Law Group, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff.

*293MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: Plaintiff Deborah Moss (“Moss” or “plaintiff’) brings this putative class action against defendant First Premier Bank1 (“First Premier” or “defendant”) alleging (1) a. substantive violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt. Organizations (“RICO”) Act pursuant

557 F.Supp.2d 566 (2008) Thomasina Yvette MEEKOWENS, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Lisa Marie's Appraisal Service, Inc., Lisa Marie Gibson, Mountain Valey Abstract, and Anita M. Peterson, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-0059. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 11, 2008. *568 John P. O'Boyle, Scranto

KAHN, J. The defendants, Richard Tanasi and Athanasula S. Casberg Tanasi, 1 appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the court in favor of the plaintiff, CitiMortgage, Inc. The defendants claim that the court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the foreclosure action because the pl

2024 IL App (1st) 230926 SECOND DIVISION September 10, 2024 No. 1-23-0926 _____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case is a post-foreclosure challenge to the foreclosure of a property owned by Michael and Chantel Aragao (the “Arag-aos”). The Aragaos assert a series of claims against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), Merrimack Mortgage Company, Inc. (“Merri*

Jetro Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, againstMastercard International, Inc. and MASTERCARD INCORPORATED, Defendants. 60374/2015 ROPES & GRAY LLPBy: Douglas H. Meal, Esq.William P. Harrington, Esq., of counselAttorneys for PlaintiffPrudential Towe

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge. The United States brought this suit against Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”) under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and District of Columbia common law, alleging that SAIC failed to make disclosures of organizational conflicts of interest (“OCIs”) a

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RETURN MAIL, INC., Appellant v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES, Appellees ______________________ 2016-1502 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED ■ . STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 242 II. Factual Allegations,. .243 A. State Foreclosure Proceedings. . .244 B. Mortgage Modification Requests ...245 C. Other Correspondence between the Tanasis

DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F

628 F.Supp.2d 608 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Samuel J. MANFREDI and Marilyn T. Manfredi, Defendants. Criminal No. 07-352. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. January 21, 2009. *613 Shaun E. Sweeney, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, for the United States of America. MEMORANDUM O

383 B.R. 604 (2008) In the matter of John LIVERMAN and Lynda K. Liverman, Debtors. No. 07-20590/JHW. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. March 5, 2008. *605 *606 S. Daniel Hutchison, Esq., Woodbury, NJ, for the Debtors. Donna L. Wenzel, Esq., Office of the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee

*372 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TONY M. DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge. In this case, the Court must determine whether certain debts must be deemed non-dischargeable due to the debtor’s failure to disclose side profits he made on land deals in which he served as fiduciary for passive investors. This matte

325 B.R. 224 (2005) In re Tommie L. SELF, Debtor. Structured Asset Services, L.L.C. f/k/a Stone Street Services, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Tommie L. Self, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02 B 19018, Adversary No. 02 A 01193. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 23, 2005. *225

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION KRAVITZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs Connecticut Department of Labor and its Commissioner Shaun B. Cashman (collectively, the “State Plaintiffs”), Plaintiffs City of Hartford and its Mayor Eddie A. Perez (collectively, the “City Plaintiffs”), and Plaintiff Delia A. Lee bring this action against Dolce International/Hartford, Inc. (“Dolce”) and OLY/Hfd Hotel, LP (“OLY”). The