Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Crutcher v. Bradley”
Bradley v. Vox Media, Inc.public domain
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge How much employer control is required for an independent contractor to be considered an employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ? That is the question raised by a purported class of employees who provide blogging a
Bradley v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM: A grand jury indicted Martin J. Bradley III and others on numerous charges stemming from their alleged participation in several schemes to defraud the Florida and California Medicaid programs. After six weeks of trial, and seven days of deliberations, a jury convicted Bradley of 247 felonies, including racketeering, mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1341, 1343, 1956, &am;
Crutcher v. Butler Townshippublic domain
OPINION This matter is an appeal from the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas decision granting summary judgment in favor of Butler Township and the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers' Compensation, finding that appellant Mark Crutcher's alleged mental condition is not compensable under the workers' compensation system on the basis that he had not sustained an "injury" pursuant to R.C. 4123.01.
Harold C. Bowden, IV v. Amber Crutcherpublic domain
02/21/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 3, 2024 Session HAROLD C. BOWDEN, IV V. AMBER CRUTCHER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 83CC1-2021-CV-344 Joe Thompson, Judge No. M2023-01735-COA-R3-CV In this c
Lindsay Hecox v. Bradley Littlepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINDSAY HECOX; JANE DOE, with No. 20-35813 her next friends Jean Doe and John Doe, D.C. No. 1:20-cv- 00184-DCN Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BRADLEY LITTLE, in his official OPINION capacity as Governor of the State of Idaho; SHERRI YBARRA, in her official capacity as the Superint
People v. Crutcherpublic domain
Mr. JUSTICE EBERSPACHER delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant entered a plea of guilty to armed robbery on May 14, 1968. On March 9, 1969, he filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief, claiming that he had been denied his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial, because he had been kept in custody from September 8, 1967, to February 5, 1968, th
245 F.Supp.2d 17 (2003) Theresa BRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS DISPUTE RESOLUTION, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-2047(RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 28, 2003. *18 Theresa B. Bradley, Sandersville, GA, for Plaintiff. Francis Joseph Warin, Dougla
Bradley E. Julius v. Accurus Aerospace Corporationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRADLEY E. JULIUS, in his ) capacity as Seller Representative, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ACCURUS AEROSPACE ) C.A. No. 2017-0632-MTZ CORPORATION and ACCURUS ) AEROSPACE WICHI
State of Tennessee v. Bradley Darrin Williamspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 19, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRADLEY DARRIN WILLIAMS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 1-CR-118429 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge No. M2015-00946-CCA-R3-CD – Filed July 26, 2016 A Williamson County grand jury indicted the Defendant, Bradley Darrin Williams, for one count of
State of Tennessee v. Bradley Scottpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 10, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRADLEY SCOTT Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 09-05054, 10-05874 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2011-00677-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 10, 2012 The defendant, Bradley Scott, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury, under two separ
Crutcher v. Continental Nat. Bankpublic domain
884 S.W.2d 884 (1994) Greg and Donna CRUTCHER, Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK, Appellee. No. 08-94-00026-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. September 15, 1994. Rehearing Denied October 19, 1994. *885 David J. Kimmelman, Gage, Beach & Ager, El Paso, for appellants. David M. Driscoll, Pota
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 29, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. DANE SAYLES, ALIAS BRADLEY HARPER Appeal from the Criminal Court of Hamilton County No. 268630 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge No. E2012-00138-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 3, 2013 Dane Sayles, alias Bradley Harper (“the Defendant”),
Bordelon v. Crutcherpublic domain
430 So.2d 1107 (1983) Irion J. BORDELON v. Albert B. CRUTCHER. No. CA 0108. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 4, 1983. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1983. *1108 Shushan, Meyer, Jackson, McPhearson & Herzog, Bradley M. Smolkin, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee. Jones, Walker, Waechter, P
State of Tennessee v. Alfred Eugene Bradleypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 28, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALFRED EUGENE BRADLEY Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County Nos. 234375, 233962, 234979 Rebecca Stern, Judge No. E2002-02840-CCA-R3-CD February 5, 2004 The defendant w
CODY, Justice. The principal question for determination on this appeal is that of priority of the *886liens claimed by the parties to this appeal as securing their claims against the fund of $21,880.39, which was the amount of the sum which remained unpaid by the Humble Pipe Line Company upon its debt to Lade-wig Engineering Co., at the time a writ of garnishment was
229 S.W.2d 600 (1950) BIG THREE WELDING EQUIPMENT CO., Inc., v. CRUTCHER, ROLFS, CUMMINGS, Inc., et al. No. A-2499. Supreme Court of Texas. May 3, 1950. Rehearing Denied May 31, 1950. Harry W. Freeman, Houston, for Big Three Welding Equipment Co., Inc. Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Bradley, Homer Mabry, Bates, Cartwright & Bates, and Rea
Crutcher v. Kentuckypublic domain
141 U.S. 47 (1891) CRUTCHER v. KENTUCKY. No. 828. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 19, 1890. Decided May 25, 1891. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. *52 Mr. W.W. Macfarland for plaintiff in error. Mr. James P. Helm (with whom was Mr. Helm Bruce on the
Colgate v. Juul Labs, Inc.public domain
William H. Orrick, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are adults and minors from seven states bring class claims against defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. ("JUUL"), a market leader in the burgeoning electronic cigarette industry, for various state law violations related to JUUL's advertising and labelling of its electronic cigarettes. JUUL argues that the Tobacco Control Act,
State v. Gerald P. Mitchellpublic domain
2018 WI 84 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP304-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gerald P. Mitchell, Defendant-Appellant. ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FILED
Sause v. Bauerpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 20, 2017 Elisabeth A. Shumaker