Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Crowell v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration”
Angela Crowell v. Kilolo Kijakazipublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3097 ANGELA K. CROWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Co
Iris Vega v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
*1216 DUBINA, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Iris Vega (“Vega”), appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“the Commissioner”) denial of disability insurance benefits. We reverse. I. BACKGROUND A.
19-3591, 19-3595 New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Make the Road New York v. Cuccinelli UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 2, 2020 Decided: August 4, 2020 Docket Nos. 19-3591, 19-3595 STATE OF N
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New Yorkpublic domain
172 F.3d 144 James BENJAMIN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Michael JACOBSON, Commissioner of the Department ofCorrection of the City of New York, et al.,Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 96-7957. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued en banc Feb. 25, 1998.Decided March 23, 1999. Joh
James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New Yorkpublic domain
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. I. Background This ease concerns the applicability of the recently enacted Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (the “PLRA” or the “Act”), to a set of consent decrees and supplemental orders (collectively the “Consent Decrees”) entered into by New York and by pre-trial detainees in the New York
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: Samuels, Kramer & Company (the Company) challenges the authority of the Chief Judge of the United States Tax Court to appoint “special trial judges” and to assign the adjudication of tax cases involving complex issues and substantial deficiency assessments to these “special judges” pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7443A(a) and 7443A(b)(4). The Company submi
Auborn v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION NlMS, Chief Judge: This case was heard by Special Trial Judge Peter J. Panuthos pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A of the Code.1 The Court agrees with and adopts the Special Trial Judge’s opinion, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE PAN
Cynthia D. Gentry v. Linda Rudolph, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Human Services - Concurringpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE _______________________________________________ FILED October 4, 1995 CYNTHIA D. GENTRY, Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court C
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches v. Northampton County Board of Electionspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3166 PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES; LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD; COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA; BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; BARRY M. SEASTEAD; MARLENE G. GUTIERREZ; AYNNE MARGARET PLEBAN POLINSKI; JOEL BENCAN; L
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
Case: 19-10011 Document: 00515265674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 REVISED January 9, 2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
REVISED December 20, 2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019 No. 19-10011 Lyle W. Cayce
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
Case: 19-10011 Document: 00515242592 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019 No. 19-10011
Kornegey v. City of Phila.public domain
Rufe, District Judge Plaintiff Antoine Kornegey filed suit alleging that he was assaulted by another inmate and that the City of Philadelphia and its employees failed to protect him from harm. After an earlier partial motion to dismiss was granted, Defendant filed an Amended Complaint.1 Now, the City of Philadelphia, former Commissioner of the Philadelphia Prison System Louis Giorla, Warden William Lawto
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 2 AND 51 and BUENA VISTA COUNTY BOAR
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: We consider a constitutional challenge to § 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationali *526 ty Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), which requires that the Attorney General take into custody, and detain without bail, certain categories of aliens during the pen-dency of r
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 2 AND 51 and BUENA VISTA COUNTY BOAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 Amended April 11, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAG
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trumppublic domain
OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore
Pueblo of Pojoaque v. New Mexicopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendants Susana Martinez, Jeremiah Ritchie, Jeffrey S. Landers, Salvatore Maniaci, Paulette Becker, Robert M. Doughty III, and Carl E. Londone’s Motion to Dismiss Count IV on the Basis of Qualified Immunity, filed December 4, 2015 (Doc. 60)(“Qualified Immunity Motion”); (ii) Defenda