Cases

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.

325 B.R. 787 (2005) In re Shawn Patrick CROSSEN, Debtor. Mark J. Wittman, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-14234-7, Adversary No. 04-238. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin. May 11, 2005. *788 Mark J. Wittman, Gorski & Wittman S.C., Marshfield, WI, for Plaintiff.

[Cite as State v. Crossen, 2011-Ohio-2509.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee :

Marshall, C.J. Attorney Gary C. Crossen contests an information filed in the county court by the Board of Bar Overseers (board) recommending that Crossen be disbarred for his part in an intricate plan to discredit a Superior Court judge presiding in an ongoing matter in which he represented some of the litigants. The aim of the plan was to influence the outcome of the litiga*535

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KIMBERLY ANNE CROSSEN, Appellant, v. MICHAEL EDWARD FEELEY, Appellee. No. 4D2024-3024 [February 11, 2026] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach Coun

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT STEPHEN MAZZOLA’S MOTION TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT’S ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 (DOCKET ENTRY #123); DEFENDANT STEPHEN MAZZOLA’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT’S ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 RELATIVE TO DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL RECORDS (DOCKET ENTRY # 128) BOWLER, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Stephen J. Mazzola seeks r

Appeal from D. C. E. D, Ky, Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Roe v. Wade, ante, p. 113,

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellant Roland Marshall Dumas was convicted in a jury trial of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1988). The district court (Woodlock, J.) imposed a sentence of 262 months imprisonment, and denied Dumas’s Motion for New Trial and Revised Motion for New Trial based on newly discovered evidence. Dum

59 F.Supp.2d 172 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert F. CARROZZA, et al., Defendants. No. CRIM.A. 97-40009-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 20, 1999. Jeffrey Auerhahn, Cynthia Young, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for U.S. John H. LaChance, Framingham, MA, for Robert F. Carrozza. Robert F. Carrozza, Central Falls, RI

892 So.2d 666 (2004) EAST BANK CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL SERVICE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT; and Edward L. Goldman v. Mikel C. CROSSEN. No. 04-CA-838. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. December 28, 2004. *667 Louis G. Gruntz, Jr., Jefferson, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Edward L. Goldman. Debra Gail Miller, Jefferson, L

CYR, Circuit Judge. Defendant Gary S. Gilberg challenges several district court rulings relating to his trial and sentencing for conspiring to make, and making, false statements to financial institutions in order to procure mortgage loan financing, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 1014. We affirm all but the restitutionary sentence. I

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. These cases arise out of an extensive undercover law enforcement operation targeted at the “New York Boys,” a large-scale drug distribution ring operating out of the Orchard Park Housing Project in Roxbury, Massachusetts. The seven defendants currently before the court appeal their convictions, their sentences, or both. We affirm the district court’s rulings on all but one point.1

796 F.Supp. 42 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Roland M. DUMAS. Crim. No. 91-10224-S. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 17, 1992. Michael J. Pelgro, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. *43 Gary C. Crossen, Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Boston, Mass., for defendant. MEMORANDUM AN

74 F.3d 1234NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Douglas TURNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Richard W. CROSSEN, Jr., Defendant--Appellee. No. 95-7239. United Sta

771 F.Supp. 476 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Darryl WHITING, et al. Crim. No. 90-10313-S. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 4, 1991. Paul V. Kelly, Thomas C. Frongillo and Robert W. Iuliano, Asst. U.S. Attys., Boston, Mass., for U.S. *477 Gary C. Crossen, Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Boston, Mass.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, District Judge. Defendant Majid Modarressi has moved for reconsideration of the Magistrate’s Order dated January 27, 1988 (the “Magistrates’s Order”) authorizing the media to copy a ten-minute segment of a videotape of an undercover operation which was played at defendant’s detention hearing. For the reasons explained below, this motion is denied.1

637 F.Supp. 882 (1986) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jack McNATT, Defendant. Crim. No. 85-481-Y. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 16, 1986. *883 Joseph J. Balliro, Balliro, Mondano & Balliro, Boston, Mass., for defendant. Gary C. Crossen, U.S. Atty., for U.S. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON

THOMPSON, District Judge. From the petition and return it appears that the petitioner is the wife of George Soeder; that they occupy as their dwelling the premises No. 200 Walnut street, Philadelphia, which premises are used in part by the husband, George Soeder, as a public house or saloon. Two federal prohibition agents, acting under the direction of the respondent, went to the saloon, and, according to their statements, were s

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. The facts of this case are reported in United States v. McNatt, 637 F.Supp. 882 (D.Mass.1986) and under the same name in 813 F.2d 499 (1st Cir.1987). We will therefore merely outline the facts relevant to this appeal. Appellant McNatt was indicted together with Arcangelo DiFronzo on charges of conspiracy and

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. Defendants appeal from criminal convictions on drug charges. During the first part of 1983, federal agents received information implicating defendants-appellants John M. Rooney, Christopher Moscatiello, James D. Carter, and Michael P. Murray, as well as Arthur Barrett and Stephen King, in a conspiracy to possess and distribute illegal drugs. That information was corroborate