Cases

FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD

ORDER BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) filed this patent infringement action against defendant GenRad, Inc. (“GenRad”) contending that GenRad’s product, Opens Xpress I, literally infringes U.S. Patent No. 5,254,953 (“the ’953 patent”), and that Gen-Rad’s subsequently developed product, Opens Xpress II, infringes the ’953 patent under the doctrine

ORDER (A) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT STRIKING THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF (1) LEARNED INTERMEDIARY DOCTRINE; AND (2) THE SOPHISTICATED USER DEFENSE, DOC. NO. 670; AND (B) DENYING DEFENDANT AURORA PUMP COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: SOPHISTICATED PURCHASER DOCTRINE, DOC. NO. 680 J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. I

748 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) CHASE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP., Plaintiff in Interpleader, v. LAW OFFICES OF JON DIVENS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., Defendants in Interpleader. Amedraa, LLC, Cross-claimant, v. Law Offices of Jon Divens & Associates, LLC; Jon Divens, Cross-defendants. Betts and Gambles Investments, Inc., and Betts and Gambles Global Equities LLC, Cross-claimants, v. Law Offices of Jon Divens & Associat

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 20-1368 20-1412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. RICHARD M. SIMON, Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 20-1369 20-1411 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v.

23 F.Supp.2d 85 (1998) John DUDLEY, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTA SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, et.al., Defendants. No. Civ. 98-65-B. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 9, 1998. *86 *87 John P. Guase, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiff. Melissa A. Hewey, Drummond, Woodsu

286 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2003) COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FUJITSU LIMITED, et al., Defendants. No. C-02-1673 JCS. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 25, 2003. *1119 *1120 *1121 *1122

79 F.Supp.2d 422 (1999) BIACORE, AB, and Biacore, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. THERMO BIOANALYSIS CORP., Defendant. No. CIV.A.97-274 SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 30, 1999. *423 *424 *425 Edward M. McNally, and Richard D. Kirk of Morris,

929 F.Supp. 1529 (1996) Davida JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Zell MILLER, et al., Defendants, and Lucious Abrams, Jr., et al., Intervenors-Defendants, and United States of America, Intervenor-Defendant. Civil Action No. CV 196-40. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Augusta Division. May 24, 1996. As Corrected June 18, 1996. <

334 U.S. 1 (1948) SHELLEY ET UX. v. KRAEMER ET UX. No. 72. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 15-16, 1948. Decided May 3, 1948. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.[*]*2 George L. Vaughn and Herman Willer argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 72.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-821 (Filed: 17 June 2026) * ************************************** INGHAM REG’L MEDICAL CENTER, * n/k/a MCLAREN GREATER LANSING, * et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. *

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Oscar E. Hyde, Richmond Flowers, Joe Breck Gantt, and James C. Kelly, were charged with extortion and conspiracy to extort1 2in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951.2 By statutory definition the extortion must affect interstate commerce. Shortly before the trial, Kelly suffered a heart atta

129 F.Supp. 914 (1955) Michael GLENN, a Minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Ida Mae Glenn, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 16031. United States District Court, S. D. California, Central Division. March 30, 1955. *915 Samuel A. Rosenthal, Leonard G. Ratner, Norman Warren Alschuler, Los Angeles, Cal.

MATHES, District Judge. Plaintiff, a minor now five years old, by his mother as guardian ad litem, invokes the, jurisdiction of this court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), to sue for damages for injuries including cerebral palsy and other disabilities, alleged to have been sustained at the time of birth, or soon thereafter, by being dropped on his head by employees of the Dispensary at the United State

Mr. Justice Brandéis delivered the opinion of the Court. In 1919, the Coombe Garment Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, distributed all of its assets among its stockholders, and then dissolved. Thereafter, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue made deficiency assessments against it for income and profits taxes for the years 1918 and 1919. A small part of these assessments was collected leaving an unpaid balan

283 U.S. 589 (1931) PHILLIPS ET AL., EXECUTORS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 455. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 23, 1931. Decided May 25, 1931. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *591 Mr. Elkan Turk, with whom Messrs. Herman Boldman, Benjamin Wi

WILBUR, Circuit Judge. The Fox West Coast Theatres, Inc., on February 27, 1933, filed a petition in voluntary bankruptcy in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, in the form provided therefor by the Supreme Court (11 U.S.C. A. following section 53, p. 58). It alleged therein “that it owes provable debts which it is unable to pay in full, that it is willing to surrender all of its pr

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

88 F.2d 212 (1937) In re FOX WEST COAST THEATRES.[*] TALLY et al. v. FOX FILM CORPORATION et al. No. 8210. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 13, 1937. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing February 23, 1937. *213 *214 *2