Cases

461 B.R. 99 (2011) In re Douglas CROMWELL, Jr. and Mary Cromwell, Debtors. Douglas Cromwell Jr. and Mary Cromwell, Plaintiffs, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-15944-WCH. Adversary No. 09-1070. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Eastern Division. September 27, 2011. <

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. OPINION Plaintiff Grace Drummond appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) following judicial review of the denial of her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). We hold that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the C

03/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD LYONS, JAMES MICHAEL USINGER, LEE HAROLD CROMWELL, AUSTIN GARY COOPER, AND CHRISTOPHER ALAN HAUSER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2017-A-79; 2

EVELEIGH, J. The plaintiff, Marian Pikula, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the decision of an administrative hearing officer for the defendant, the Department of Social Services (department), 1 denying her application for benefits under the state administered Medicaid pr

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

BORDEN, J., with whom VERTEFEUILLE, J., joins, dissenting. The majority concludes that sexual orientation is a quasi-suspect class under our state constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal protection of the laws; Conn. Const., § 20, art. I, §§ 1 and 20;1 and, based on that conclusion, the majority further concludes that our statute confining marriage

Opinion PALMER, J. The principal issue presented by this certified appeal is whether the petitioner, Martin Hammond, who is serving a twenty-five year prison term for murder and kidnapping,1 is entitled to credit toward *857his sentence pursuant to General Statutes § 18-98d2 for the f

179 Conn. 83 (1979) CHRISTINE ZEOLI ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued June 14, 1979. Decision released September 4, 1979. COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and PETERS, JS. *84 Michael A. Arcari, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Carl R. A

234 F.Supp.2d 140 (2002) Robert R. RUHLMANN, Plaintiff, v. ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Ulster County Department of Mental Health, Marshall Beckman, Ernest Townsend, Benedictine Hospital, Ruth McGregor, Dr. Joel Ginsberg, Dr. Kevin Smith, and Dr. Diana Puglisi, Defendants. No. 99-CV-0213. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 26, 2002.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Defendant RAV Investigative and Security Services, Ltd., has not appeared in this action. A default judgment was entered against it on June 19, 2013. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman to conduct a damages inquest. (Dkt. No. 13.) Judge Freeman conducted a thorough and careful inq

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

[J-46-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. COUNTY OF FULTON, FULTON COUNTY : No. 3 MAP 2022 BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STUART L. : ULSH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS : Appeal from the Order of the COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF FULTON : Commonwealth Court at No. 277 COUNTY AND I

OPINION WRIGHT, Judge: This matter is before the Court on petitioners’ motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, for an order suppressing evidence, and respondent’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment, each filed pursuant to Rule 121, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.1 By notice of deficiency dat

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: On this appeal from the dismissal of a copyright infringement action, we must determine the collateral estoppel and res judi-cata effect of two state court judgments on a federal action for copyright infringement. RX Data Corporation (“RX Data”) developed a computerized system and provided co

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Michael P. Shea, U.S.D.J. Erik Brown asserts that the Waterbury Board of Education (“Board”) and its superintendent, Dr. Kathleen Ouellette, demoted him from his position as principal of Walsh Elementary School because he is African American. His amended complaint alleges race discrimination, including discriminatory demotion and a hostile work environment, against the Board (Count

RULINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: Attempting to apprehend the suspect of a violent crime named in an arrest war*176rant, officers of the Middletown Police Department forced entry into a small residential apartment, where they believed the suspect to be present and living. The suspect was no where to b

FILED JUNE 9, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Ex Rel. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Duane Moore (“plaintiff’) commenced this action on May 13, 2009 against defendants County of Suffolk (“County”), Town of Southampton (“Town”), Mark Epley in his official capacity as Mayor of the Village of Southampton (“Epley”), and William Wilson, Jr. in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Southampton Village Police Department (“

74 So.3d 766 (2011) David O. BORDELON, et al. v. GRAVITY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 4 OF WARD 3 OF CALCASIEU PARISH, et al. No. 10-1318. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 5, 2011. *767 Steven Broussard, Randall E. Hart, Attorneys at Law, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellees, David O. Bordelon, et al. Ti