Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 12, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-0839 Lower Tribunal No. 15-3087 ________________ Cristiano Piquet, et al.,

HULL, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, defendant Nelson Cristiano Machado appeals his three convictions for wire fraud and his 36-month sentence. After thorough review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm. I. 2010 INDICTMENT Originally from Brazil, Machado came to the United States in 1992. He lived in the O

724 F.Supp. 732 (1989) ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. Nino CRISTIANO, et al., Defendants. Nino CRISTIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARROW COACH LINES, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. CV87-7837-PAR, CV88-0822-PAR. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 31, 1989. *733

OPINION MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs move for certification of a class consisting of all present and future United Auto Workers (“UAW”) members who have been or will be subjected to attachment of their wages under 10 Del.C. §§ 3501, 9582-9583,1 the Proceeding by Attachment statute (“Attachment Statute”). The putative plaintiff class cha

669 F.Supp. 662 (1987) Sharon J. CRISTIANO, on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. The COURTS OF THE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY and the State of Delaware, Court No. 12, Marc Niedzielski, Judge of Justices of the Peace Court No. 12, in his official capacity, Charles C. Sharp, Constable for Justices of the Peace Court No. 12, in his official capacity, Defendants.

740 F.Supp. 343 (1989) ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, et al. v. NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND FOR HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES. Civ. A. No. 89-5931. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 19, 1989. *344 *345 Ira P. Tiger, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Kenneth L. Klot

826 F.Supp. 1225 (1993) THE MEADOWS, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE, Defendant. No. CIV 92-1201 PHX PGR. United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 14, 1993. *1226 Christopher D. Payne, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff. William M. Demlong, Bess & Dysart, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant. </

844 F.Supp. 46 (1994) Nancy K. JORSTAD, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 91-12042-WJS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 14, 1994. *47 James D. O'Brien, Jr., O'Brien, Bernardin & Deren, Worcester, MA, for plaintiff. Robert G. Baynes, Jr., Philip W.

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB ¶ 1 This case involves alleged fraud in the negotiated termination of agreements concerning a commission payable for facilitating the sale of a business. Defendant, Patrick Murray, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict against him on the fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment claim of plaintiff, Just In Case Business Lighthouse, LLC. We conclude that a limited remand is requi

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE MCCORMICK LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734

666 F.Supp.2d 321 (2009) Brian BEEBE & Bruce Erdreich, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Defendant. No. 09-cv-1090 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 19, 2009. *324 Jeffrey M. Bernbach, Bernbach Law Firm, White Plains, NY, for Plaintiffs. *325 Evandro C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA No. 21-15492 Michael Fuqua, D.C. No. 2:18-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 02337-DJH v. OPINION RAAK, Psychologist; D. WEBSTER, Ph.D.; HIGUERA; JONES; SUCKLE, Captain; TROMAN, CO III; MOONEY, D.W.; GOLDER, ADW; SHAW, Ph.D.; SWIRSKY, Captain; HUDSON, CO III; HORN, Lt.; METZLER,

602 F.Supp.2d 419 (2009) Gary HENRY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. No. CV 07-2577(LDW)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 6, 2009. *420 Paul J. Margiotta, Paul J. Margiotta, Esq., Lindenhurst, NY, for Plaintiff. Evandro Cristiano Gigante, Jonathan Lee Israel, Jonathan L. Sul

608 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2009) Polly WEBB, Plaintiff, v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.; a Delaware corporation; Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois corporation; Latham & Watkins Group Disability Income Insurance Plan; and Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. 2:07-cv-02000-FMC-MANx. United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. March 3,

796 F.Supp.2d 434 (2011) Cheryl MAYERS, Plaintiff, v. EMIGRANT BANCORP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 10 Civ. 2943(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 22, 2011. *437 Michael John Borrelli, Law Offices of Borrelli & Associates, Carle Place, NY, for Plaintiff. Bettina Barasch Plevan, Evandro Cristian

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHNSON, Senior District Judge: This case comes before the Court on a motion to amend the complaint and on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Jean-Robert and Edith SainL-Jean, Felix and Yantil Saintil, Linda Commodore, Felipe Howell, and Jean and Beverly Small, (the “Plaintiffs”), homeowners and former homeowners who refinanced mortgages, received financing, or had related financial deal

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Simona Howe (the “plaintiff’), brings this action against her employer, the Embassy of Italy (the “defendant”), seeking $141,134.00 in damages under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.'

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. In August 1999, William J; Spahr, through the co-conservators of his estate, brought suit in state court against U.S. • Bancorp Investments, Inc., and Melissa Catherine Secco, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, constructive trust, and negligence. Defendants removed the case to federal court and then filed a motion to stay the proceedings and order

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with my colleagues’ disposition of the equal protection and free exercise claims, but respectfully dissent from the analysis and disposition of the as-applied equal-terms RLUIPA challenge. Whether the district court took too restrictive a view when it looked solely to secular schools as

Chief Justice MULLARKEY delivered the Opinion of the Court. I. Introduction At issue here is a physician's ability to obtain judicial relief when his hospital staff privileges have been suspended pending completion of the peer review process. The Pen-rose-St. Francis Healthcare System ("the Hospital") asks this court to overturn a trial court ruling allowing Dr. Jimmie R. Crow to bring a