Cases

457 F.Supp.2d 1235 (2006) CREDIT UNION GROUP ENTERPRISES LLC, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CREDIT UNIONS, and National Credit Union Administration, Defendants. No. 06-4069-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 27, 2006. *1237 Christopher F. Burger, Jason B. Long, Stevens & Brand, L.L.P., Lawrence, KS,

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1341 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP; ADVANTAGE ASSETS II, INC.; DEBT MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC; JOHN DOES #1 - #3; BAYVIEW SOLUTIONS LLC, Defendants – Appellees. ----

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STEVE SHIFFMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) WD86311 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: ) KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL ) March 26, 2024 C

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc ALVIN BROCKINGTON, ) Opinion issued November 22, 2022 Individually and On Behalf of ) All Similarly-Situated, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC99512 ) NEW HORIZONS ENTERPRISES, LLC, )

PIEPER, J.: This appeal involves a dispute between a landlord and tenant over the division of a compensation award from a partial taking of leased property by condemnation. Walgreen Company (Tenant) appeals the master-in-equity’s decision to give the entire $100,000 award to M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC (Landlord). Since we may affirm for any reason in the record, we affirm as modified. FACT

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  ALVIN BROCKINGTON, Individually  and On Behalf of All Similarly-Situated,  Appellant,  WD83838

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 369–479 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING EMPLOYER AND PLAN DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), AS WELL AS 12(B)(2), (4), AND (5), 20(A) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) [1062] [1070] [1071] [1072] [1075] [1077] [1078] [1080] [1081] [1082] [1083] [1084] [1085] [1086] [1088] [1089] [1090] [1091] [1092]. [1093] [1094] [1095] [1096] [1097] [1098] [1100] [1101] [1105] [1106] [1107] [1108] [1109] [1110]

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

REVERSE and REMAND and Opinion Filed March 11, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00856-CV THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant V. ANGELA HORTON AND KEVIN HOUSER, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

632 F.3d 1358 (2011) TOKAI CORP., Scripto-Tokai, Inc., and Calico Brands, Inc., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, v. EASTON ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation (doing business as Easton Sales) and FLI, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Fun Line Industries, Inc. and Easton Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Counterclaimants-Appellees. Nos. 2010-1057, 2010-1116. United

440 October 25, 2019 No. 21 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. (TC 5236) Plaintiff (taxpayer) sought a reduction in the real market value of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A, Lindsay, United States District Judge The court makes the following findings of. fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following a bench trial on the following claims by Plaintiff Balfour Beatty Rail Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “BBRI”) and Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“Defendant” or “KCSR”) that remain

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

ORDER Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on: 1) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 144); 2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 146); and 3) Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 190). These matters being fully briefed and ripe for review, the court held

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Builders Trust of New México’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed November 17, 2016 (Doc. 4)(“MTD”); and (ii) Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed December 6, 2016 (Doc. 10)(“Motion for Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on'January 23, 2017." The primary is