Cases

[J-44-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. STANLEY CRAWFORD, TRACEY : No. 19 EAP 2022 ANDERSON, DELIA CHATTERFIELD, : AISHAH GEORGE, RITA GONSALVES, : Appeal from the Order of MARIA GONSALVES-PERKINS, WYNONA : Commonwealth Court entered on HARPER, TAMIKA MORALES, CHE

834 A.2d 1229 (2003) In re DAUPHIN COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU Tax Upset Sale on September 27, 2002 for Property Located at 1014 North Third Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Anthony Ricci, v. Dauphin County Tax Bureau and Peter I. Bentivegna, Appeal of Peter I. Bentivegna. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 9, 2003. Decided October 30, 2003.

511 F.Supp.2d 460 (2007) Vickie SMITH, Plaintiff v. CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Barbara Hasson, Yvonne Hollins, and Richard Mazzatesta, Defendants. Civil No. 1:05-CV-01003. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. June 22, 2007. *461 *462 Andrew J. Ostrowski, Don Bailey, Sheri D.

DOWLING, J., “The Power to Tax Involves the Power to Destroy.” 1 In a scenario one might expect to read in Pravda as an example of the “degenerate bourgeoisie” grinding down the “helpless” proletariat, we find the Fawbers stripped of their land (valued in excess of $30,000) for inadvertently paying approximately $350 in back taxes ins

983 F.2d 1054 White (William D.)v.Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Secretary of Commonwealth,Comm of Elections, Board of Commissioners for the countiesof Adams, Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bedfore, Berks,Blair, Bradford, Bucks, Butler, Cambria, Cameron, Carbon,Centre, Chester, Clarion, Clearfield, Clinton, Columbia,Crawford, Cumberland, Dauphin, Delaware, Elk, Erie, Fayette,Forest, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntington

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 25-1644 _______________________ BETTE EAKIN; DSCC; DCCC; AFT PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BERKS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BLAIR COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIO

MEMORANDUM. KEARNEY, District Judge. ' Arrested persons awaiting trial are entitled to due process whether they are detained in prison or released on bail. If the state has probable cause to believe a person violated terms of house arrest on bail, it can investigate and recommend charges for bail violations. We now face an apparent wrinkle where Lackawanna County allows its Director of House Arrest, accom

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL : No. 136 MM 2024 COMMITTEE AND THE REPUBLICAN : PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : ALL 67

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL : No. 136 MM 2024 COMMITTEE AND THE REPUBLICAN : PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : ALL 67

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL : No. 136 MM 2024 COMMITTEE AND THE REPUBLICAN : PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : ALL 67

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL : No. 136 MM 2024 COMMITTEE AND THE REPUBLICAN : PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : ALL 67

ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment solely on Plaintiffs discriminatory and retaliatory termination claim (Docs. 12, 13) and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 17). While provided with the opportunity to do so, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. Background

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 25-1644 _____________ BETTE EAKIN; DSCC; DCCC; AFT PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BERKS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BLAIR COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; B

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 25-1644 _____________ BETTE EAKIN; DSCC; DCCC; AFT PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BERKS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BLAIR COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; B

*669 OPINION Chief Justice CASTILLE. “Controversies growing out of the assessment and collection of taxes are as old as civilization. To question the assessment, to doubt the levy, and to delay the collector may be classed among those inalienable rights of mankind not guaranteed by any Constitution, but very generally asserted under the law

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3166 PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES; LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD; COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA; BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; BARRY M. SEASTEAD; MARLENE G. GUTIERREZ; AYNNE MARGARET PLEBAN POLINSKI; JOEL BENCAN; L

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 12a0399p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - ROBERT DALE ANDREWS and PATTI Plaintiffs

CALDWELL, Chancellor, This class action litigation seeks to strike down a resolution adopted by defendant school district under The Local Tax Enabling Act of December 31,1965, P.L. 1257, 53 PS §§6901, et seq., which imposes an “occupation” tax on all persons residing in the district who are 18 years of age or older. Plaintiffs Peifer and White are retired individuals, aged 75 and 76, with no income other than that receive

271 Pa. Superior Ct. 218 (1979) 412 A.2d 892 CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICT v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 12, 1979. Filed October 19, 1979. *221 Leo E. Gribben, Jr., York, for appellant. David E. Lehman, Harrisburg, for appellee. Before

OPINION BY Judge McGINLEY. Célico Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Verizon) appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County (trial court) which denied Verizon’s appeal from a decision of the Lycoming County Board of Assessment (Board) which determined that six communications towers (Towers) owned by Verizon were taxable as real property. Verizon appealed the real estate