Cases

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 05-1-01647-1, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered May 5, 2006. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Kulik, J., concurred in by Brown and Stephens, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 03-1-00202-3, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered August 22, 2003. Remanded by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, A.C.J., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0952 Filed May 13, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ADAM CRARY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Allamakee County, Alan Heavens, Judge. A defendant appeals from his guilty plea and conviction for sexual abuse in the third degree. AFFIRME

187 P.3d 753 (2008) STATE v. CRARY. No. 80683-7. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. July 10, 2008. Disposition of petition for review. Denied.

638 N.W.2d 23 (2002) 2002 ND 9 In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul T. CRARY, a Person Admitted to the Bar of the State of North Dakota. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota, Petitioner, v. Paul T. Crary, Respondent. No. 20010200. Supreme Court of North Dakota. January 15, 2002.

PER CURIAM. [¶ 1] Disciplinary counsel filed a petition for discipline against Paul T. Crary. Crary contested the allegations of misconduct and a hearing was held before a hearing panel. The hearing panel issued its report on July 31, 2001, recommending that Crary be disbarred and that he be ordered to pay restitution to the victim. Crary failed to file a brief with this Court opposing the recommendations.1

OPINION OF THE COURT Levine, J. P. Plaintiff Washington County Sewer District No. 2 (hereinafter plaintiff) owns and operates a combined sanitary and storm sewer system within the Villages of Hudson Falls and Fort Edward, Washington County, pursuant to 1985 agreements with those Villages. For the past several years, plaintiff’s system has been experiencing excessive storm water overflow due to the lack of ad

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2251 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cv-00054- SLG KUSKOKWIM RIVER INTER- TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION; ASSOCIATION OF VILLAGE COUNCIL PRESIDENTS; BETTY OPINION MAGNUSON; IVAN M. IVAN; AHTNA TENE NENE; AHTNA, INC.; ALASKA FEDERATION

OPINION OF THE COURT Crew III, J. On December 20, 1989 and February 12, 1990 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (hereinafter OCC) issued interpretive letters declaring that national banking associations were permitted to broker fixed-rate annuities under the provisions of 12 USC § 24 (Seventh). Following the issuance of the OCC letters, the New York State Bankers Association requested an opinio

OAKES, Chief Judge: Margaret Bodnar was seventy-seven years old when she was brought by ambulance and carried in by stretcher to the Helen Hayes Hospital in West Haverstraw, New York, on August 6, 1982. Having left the hospital only two weeks earlier, after recuperation from surgery and from an infection to her left hip, Bodnar was suffering from a painful and swollen left knee. S

157 F.2d 410 (1946) CRARY et al. v. PORTER, Price Administrator. No. 13384. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. October 4, 1946. Rehearing Denied October 29, 1946. *411 C. Floyd Huff, Jr., of Hot Springs, Ark. (Q. Byrum Hurst, of Hot Springs, Ark., on the brief), for appellants. Albert M. Dreyer, Chi

OPINION OF THE COURT Yesawich Jr., J. On May 15, 1991, respondent Division of the Lottery (hereinafter the Lottery) issued a request for proposals (hereinafter RFP) inviting vendors to submit bids for a five-year contract to provide an on-line lottery system. Two companies, respondent GTECH Corporation and Control Data Corporation (hereinafter CDC), submitted bids which were to be evaluated, according to

219 Miss. 284 (1953) 68 So.2d 468 46 Adv. S. 25 CRARY, et ux. v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. No. 39014. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 14, 1953. Morse & Morse, Gulfport, for appellants. *286 Matthew Harper, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

*138OPINION OF THE COURT Yesawich Jr., J. Plaintiff Comptroller is the administrator of the State and Local Employees’ Retirement System and the State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System (hereinafter the retirement systems), as well as the sole trustee of the Common Retirement Fund (hereinafter CRF), which consists of "all of the assets and in

#31010-a-JMK 2026 S.D. 40 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GARY DEAN OGDEN, JR., Defendant and Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT UNION COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA THE HONORABLE KASEY SORENSEN

Sweeney, J. — RCW 48.22.030 requires a written rejection of uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage limits less than liability limits for any new policy. Susan and David Torgerson bought a 1983 Dodge van after trading in their Ford van. They added coverages, including UIM coverage, to their insurance policy. However, their State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company policy number remained the same. After an accident wit

REVERSED AND REMANDED. This is an action commenced on March 9, 1928, by the executrix of the estate of C.A. Eastman, deceased, to recover amount alleged to be due on four promissory notes, dated January 13, 1911, each in the sum of $14,665.10, due respectively one, two, two and one-half and three years after date. It is alleged that no part of said notes, which were executed in the state of Washington, has been paid except that, on November 17, 1925, the sum of $37.50 was paid by the defendan

Main, J. — The purpose of this action was to recover damages for fraud, alleged to have been practiced in a real estate transaction. After the issues were framed, the cause, in due time, came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof, and moved for a dismissal of the action. This motion was sustained, and a judgment of dismissal ente

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 09-0387 ════════════

Siddoway, J. ¶1 The city of Spokane brought a motion for discretionary review of the superior court’s dismissal of each respondent’s notice of infraction (NOI) issued for alleged red light violations. Review was denied by our commissioner’s office and, with this opinion, by us. We exercise our discretion under RAP 17.6(b) to issue an opinion explaining our reasoning. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND