Cases

WALLIS, J. Peter Shapiro petitions this court for a writ of prohibition following the dismissal of his motion to disqualify the trial judge. Trial courts determine the legal sufficiency of a motion to disqualify by considering whether “the facts alleged (which must be taken as true) would prompt a reasonably prudent person to fear that he could not get a fair and impartial trial.” Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553, 556 (Fla. 4th D

Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge Pro se defendant Shawn Craig has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his 84-month sentence based on four errors in calculating his guideline sentencing range. The Government points out that Craig's plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)

ORDER PER CURIAM. This case involves the appeal from a judgment granting Stacey Peters (Mother) sole physical custody of her two daughters and joint legal custody with Jason Peters (Father). At trial, Father had argued that in the event he was not awarded physical custody of the children, it should go to his parents, David and Betty Peters (Grandparents). Both Father and Grandparents appeal the court’s de

OPINION DIETZEN, Justice. Appellant Andrew Anthony Craig was found guilty by a Ramsey County jury of possessing a firearm as an ineligible person, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2) (2012). After trial, Craig moved to vacate his conviction on the basis that the statute, as applied to him, violated the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied the motion an

OPINION HUDSON, Judge. On appeal from his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, appellant Andrew Anthony Craig argues that (1) MinmStat. § 624.713, subd. 1(2), which imposes a lifetime prohibition against the possession of a firearm by a *458person convicted of a crime of violence, violates the Second Amendment as applied t

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2016 WY 65 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2016 June 29, 2016 DOUGLAS CRAIG LEMLEY, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-15-0225 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County

EMAS, J. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC appeals the final orders of the trial court which entered judgment in favor of Fred Craig, Jr. and Janiee Minnis-Craig on Nationstar’s action for foreclosure, and canceled the promissory note, .but. awarded a money judgment (without foreclosure) in favor of Nationstar. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

878 N.E.2d 431 (2007) Donald L. GARRIOTT, Larry E. Garriott, Mark D. Garriott, and Dennis L. Garriott, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Edward L. PETERS and Patsy L. Christian, Appellees-Defendants. No. 24A01-0703-CV-119. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 28, 2007. *434 Craig D. Doyle, Mark R. Galliher, Kurt V. Laker, Doyle & Fr

OPINION Opinion by Justice Burgess Kenneth Craig Vickers was indicted for burglary of a habitation with intent to commit aggravated assault and aggravated kidnapping. After entering an open plea of guilty to the indicted offense, Vickers elected to have the trial court decide punishment. After hearing the evidence, the trial court fo

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. Long claims that the Department of Transportation discriminated against her on the basis of her race in denying her a career l

OPINION HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. In United States v. Khattak, 273 F.3d 557 (3d Cir.2001), we upheld the validity of a defendant’s waiver of appellate rights following his guilty plea. This appeal presents the novel question of whether a waiver of certain post-conviction rights nullifies an appellate waiver. We hold that it does not.

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."

CHARLES R. JONES, Judge, Ad Hoe. It The Appellants, Lisa Alack Peters, Joseph Winterstein, and Michelle Winter-stein, appeal an adverse district court judgment that maintained Sheriff J. Edward Layrisson’s and Connie Lowery’s (the named Appellees) Exception of Prescription and dismissed the Appellants’ case with prejudice. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Appellants are the parents

THOMPSON, Associate Judge: In June 2012, appellant Craig Russell brought a lawsuit asserting “negligence— premises liability” and “strict liability/negligent failure to warn” claims against ap-pellee Call/D, LLC (“Call/D”), the owner of the apartment building where appellant was residing when he began to suffer the symptoms of Legionnaires’ disease, with which he was diagnosed in

PER CURIAM. Former Wife appeals a final judgment of the trial court equitably distributing the parties’ assets and liabilities, establishing child visitation, and denying her request for attorney fees. As to the denial of attorney fees and the requirement that the parties comply with the Twelfth Judicial Circuit visitation schedule, no abuse of discretion is shown, and we affirm. However, as to the equitable distribution scheme, w

hTERRI F. LOVE, Judge. Craig A. Peters was charged by bill of information on October 14, 1999, with illegal use of a weapon in violation of La. R.S. 14:94(F), and with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of La. R.S. 14:95.1. He entered pleas of not guilty at his arraignment. After a hearing, the trial court found probable cause and denied the motion to suppress the evidence. Subsequently, Peters withdre

BROWN, Circuit Judge. Appellant Phillip Woodruff asserted discrimination and retaliation claims against the Secretary of Transportation. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary on both claims. We now reverse the district court’s order relating to the discrimination claim, affirm the order relating to the retaliation claim, and remand for further proce

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment denying the claim of appellant, the Cincinnati Enquirer, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, James E. Craig, 1 the chief of police of the city of Cincinnati, to provide access to certain records pursuant to R.C. 149.

930 A.2d 946 (2007) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants, v. Peter S. CRAIG, et al., Appellees. District of Columbia, et al., Appellants, v. Polly H. Ernst, et al., Appellees. Nos. 06-TX-177, 06-TX-178. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 12, 2007. Decided July 19, 2007. *948 Mar

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge. In 1997, the Federal Aviation Administration reassigned appellant Loni Czekal-ski — then a senior career official — -to a new position with different responsibilities. She alleges that the reassignment was effectively a demotion, and that it resulted