Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Craig v. Davis”
Craig v. Davispublic domain
GLASSMAN, Justice. Omar M. Davis and Elizabeth A. Davis appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Gunther, J.)1 granting the relief sought by Charles B. Craig in his complaint against the Davises for a declaration of the existence of a public easement over Isthmus Road, between Crow Hill Road and Route 150 in Parkman. We agree with the Davises’ content
Craig Ross v. Ronald Davispublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRAIG ANTHONY ROSS, No. 17-99000 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cv-02720- SVW RONALD DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District
Barry Craig Davis v. Statepublic domain
FIFTH DIVISION DILLARD, C. J., REESE, J., and BETHEL, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules
Craig Davis v. First National Bank of Sonorapublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00661-CV Craig DAVIS, Appellant v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SONORA, Ap
Craig Davis v. First National Bank of Sonorapublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 29, 2023 No. 04-23-00661-CV Craig DAVIS, Appellant v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SONORA, Appellee From the 451st Ju
Barry Craig Davis v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, February 16, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0129. BARRY CRAIG DAVIS v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1559 Filed July 16, 2014 ROBERT O. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CLIFFORD GARTH DAVIS, CONNIE SUE WORKMAN, and JAMES CRAIG DAVIS, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wayne County, Terry Rickers, Judge. Plaintiff appeals the district court decision gra
Davis v. Craigpublic domain
66 F.3d 319 Davisv.Craig NO. 94-50143 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 25, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. W-93-CV-153 1 AFFIRMED.
Tommy Davis Craig v. David Robert Disonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2004 Session TOMMY DAVIS CRAIG v. DAVID ROBERT DISON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cheatham County No. 5272 Allen W. Wallace, Judge No. M2003-00419-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 5, 2004 This appeal involves an unsuccessful plaintiff who seeks revi
Douglas Craig Lemley v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2016 WY 65 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2016 June 29, 2016 DOUGLAS CRAIG LEMLEY, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-15-0225 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County
Craig Cunningham v. General Dynamics Informationpublic domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Greg Cunningham alleges that he received an autodialed, prerecorded phone call from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. ("GDIT") advertising the commercial availability of health insurance, without having given his prior express consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"). The district court granted GDIT's motion to dismiss
Craig Reynolds v. Statepublic domain
OPINION REX D. DAVIS, Justice. Appellant Craig Rudy Reynolds was charged by indictment with the offense of failure to comply with sex-offender registration requirements. The charges originated from a 1990 conviction for sexual assault of a child, for which Reynolds was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Reynolds apparently served his entire five-year s
Mack v. Davispublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
People v. Davispublic domain
Motion for reargument denied. Present—Whalen, P.J., Centra, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Winslow, JJ.
Roger Dale Craig v. State of Mississippipublic domain
GREENLEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This is an appeal from a criminal conviction in Quitman County Circuit Court. On June 27, 2013, Roger Dale Craig fired one shot at David “Dusty” Wayne Smith III inside a combination service station and fast-food restaurant in Marks, Mississippi. The gunshot was fatal to Smith. Multiple bystanders were present on both the s
People v. Davispublic domain
Motion for reargument denied. Present—Whalen, P.J., Centra, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Winslow, JJ.
People v. Davispublic domain
Motion for reargument denied. Present—Whalen, P.J., Centra, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Winslow, JJ.
Russell v. Davispublic domain
TERRY R. MEANS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In 2008, petitioner Edward Lynn Russell was adjudicated a sexually violent predator in Tarrant County, Texas, under prior provisions of Chapter 841 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and ordered to civil commitment. (Reporter's R., vol. 6, State's Ex. 1, doc. 14-10.) Petitioner was later charged with violating multiple requirements of his civil commitment, a third-degree felony, and was
People v. Davispublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered September 11, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of rape in the second degree (two counts), criminal sexual act in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child and sexual abuse in the third degree (two counts). It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the
DAVIS v. the STATE.public domain
McFadden, Presiding Judge. After a jury trial, Larry Michael Davis was convicted of two counts of child molestation. The trial court denied Davis's motion for new trial, and he filed this appeal. Davis argues that when denying the motion for new trial, the trial court failed to exercise his discretion and weigh the evidence in his consideration of the general grounds as required by OCGA