Cases

290 S.C. 333 (1986) 350 S.E.2d 388 Mable Craig CARTEE, Joseph Lane Cartee, Gary L. Cartee, and Gregory D. Cartee, Petitioners v. Jasper P. LESLEY and W.G. Acker, Respondents. 22622 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard May 19, 1986. Decided November 3, 1986. *334

ORDER Petitioners ask this Court to issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Cartee v. Lesley, 286 S. C. 249, 333 S. E. (2d) 341 (Ct. App. 1985). We grant the writ as to Question II in the petition. The Appendix shall be docketed as the Transcript of Record as of the date of this order. Petitioners shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for fi

286 S.C. 249 (1985) 333 S.E.2d 341 Mable Craig CARTEE, Joseph Lane Cartee, Gary L. Cartee and Gregory D. Cartee, Appellants-Respondents, v. Jasper P. LESLEY and W.G. Acker, Respondents-Appellants. 0517 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard April 22, 1985. Decided July 1, 1985. *250

722 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Employment Practices Litigation. This Document Relates to: Carlene M. Craig, et al. v. Fed Ex Ground Package System, Inc., Civil No. 3:05-CV-530 RLM (KS). Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM. MDL No. 1700. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. June 28, 2010.

54 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 120 (1980) Ruth Lesley, Petitioner v. Oxford Area School District, Respondent. No. 1828 C.D. 1977. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on briefs September 8, 1980. October 1, 1980. Submitted on briefs September 8, 1980, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., ROGERS and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.

DECISION CARLA E. CRAIG, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge In this adversary proceeding, plaintiff Lesley Campbell (“Plaintiff’ or “Campbell”) seeks a determination that funds she borrowed under a CitiAssist Bar Exam Loan (“Bar Loan”) in April, 2009 is dis-chargeable. Citibank, N.A. and The Student Loan Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”), two of the five defendants in this action, seek dism

394 S.C. 37 (2011) 714 S.E.2d 313 In the Matter of Craig J. POFF, Respondent. No. 27028. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard June 8, 2011. Decided August 22, 2011. *39 Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for Of

OPINION ON REHEARING Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice Both parties moved for rehearing of our May 3, 2016 opinion. We deny both motions for rehearing, withdraw our May 3, 2016 opinion and judgment, and issue this opinion and judgment in their stead. Our disposition remains unchanged. Francisco Calleja-Ahedo (“Calleja”) sued Compass Bank

143 P.3d 658 (2006) Lesley J. WATEGA, Appellant, v. Craig T. WATEGA, David Drumm, and Kristy Drumm, Appellees. No. S-11652. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 8, 2006. Rehearing Denied October 23, 2006. *659 David A. Golter, Golter & Logsdon, P.C., Palmer, for Appellant. Michael Jungreis, Bethany A. Pr

MEMORANDUM * Lesley Smith, a former employee of Alternative Resources Corporation (“ARC”), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of ARC in her action for pregnancy discrimination and retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12900 et seq., and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Smith also argues that the

670 S.E.2d 480 (2008) VALENTINO v. MATARA. No. A08A1542. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 21, 2008. *481 Hait & Eichelzer, Philip K. Eichelzer III, Lesley Annis, Woodstock, for appellant. Harper, Waldon & Craig, Russell D. Waldon, Sebastian C. Suma, Louis L. McLendon, Atlanta, Christopher C. Folsom, for appell

Justice Blacklock delivered the opinion of the Court. An identity thief drained Francisco Calleja-Ahedo's bank account through a series of fraudulent transactions in 2012 and 2013. Calleja sued his bank to recover the stolen funds. The question now is whether Calleja or his bank must suffer the financial consequences of the theft. Section 4.406 of the Business and Commerce Code contains

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge. Under the Davis-Baeon Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq., bidders on certain construction projects funded by the federal government must pay workers specified wage rates based upon the type of work performed. See 40 U.S.C. § 3142. The Departme

19 F.Supp.2d 890 (1998) Ernest T. BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 95 C 1890. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 16, 1998. Craig Benson Futterman, Futterman & Howard, Chtd., Chicago, IL, Lesley A. Redman, Kenneth N. Flaxman, Kenneth N. Flaxman, P.C., Chicago, IL, for plaintiffs.

36 Cal.App.4th 683 (1995) 42 Cal. Rptr.2d 533 BUILDING PROFIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MORTGAGE AND REALTY TRUST, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. E013067. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. July 7, 1995. *685 COUNSEL Cox, Castle & Nicholson, David

*1031 MANION, Circuit Judge. Truck driver Lesley Parkins sued her employer, Civil Constructors of Illinois, Inc., under Title VII, alleging hostile environment sexual harassment and retaliation. The district court granted summary judgment for Civil Constructors because it promptly remedied any harassme

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JANE & JEFF BURLINGAME, PAM : No. 296 MAL 2018 HOLTER, JAMES & JENNIFER HYDE, : SHANE & CHANTEL LEVARDI, KIP & : ANGELA MCCABE, JOHN & VERONICA : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from MOLITORIS, APRIL & MATTHEW : the Order of the Superior Court SNYDER, JACQUELINE & BARRY : TITUS, JEFFREY & COLLEEN WALKER, : JOHN & PATRICIA KACHURKA, : DWAYNE & SANDRA

ACCEPTED 01-15-00210-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-15-00210-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

O'CONNOR, GRAIG, GOULD & EVANS AN ASSOCIATION OF ATTORNEY AT LAW 2500 TANGLEWILDE m^£« SUITE 222 HOUSTON. TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 77063 (713) 266-3311 MAR - 6 2015 Facsimile: (713) 953-7513