Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Craig H Boyle”
Boyle v. Commonwealthpublic domain
Opinion by Judge Craig, Nancy Boyle, an eight-year employee of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), District Council 47, appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirmed a referees decision, concluding that Ms. Boyle committed willful misconduct1 by diverting a memorandum from the top of her supervisor’s desk in o
Boaz v. Boyle & Co.public domain
* Ameen v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076777), Finazzo v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076778), Vitiello v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076779), Ferri v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076782), Springer v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076783), Weinrub v. Boyle Company, Inc. (No. B076784),O'Kyle v. Boyle Com
Boyle Ventures, LLC v. City of Fayettevillepublic domain
Cite as 2025 Ark. 71 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-226 Opinion Delivered: May 15, 2025 BOYLE VENTURES, LLC APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 04CV-22-2109] V. HONORABLE DOUGLAS SCHRANTZ, JUDGE CITY OF FA
Craig Cunningham v. General Dynamics Informationpublic domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Greg Cunningham alleges that he received an autodialed, prerecorded phone call from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. ("GDIT") advertising the commercial availability of health insurance, without having given his prior express consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"). The district court granted GDIT's motion to dismiss
Boyle v. Statepublic domain
Jim Gunter, Justice. Appellant Patrick Boyle was convicted of capital murder for shooting his live-in companion, Carol Ivanhoe. Because the State waived the death penalty before trial, Boyle was automatically sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-10-101(c)(Supp. 2005). Boyle raises four points on appeal: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusi
Arnold's Wines, Inc. v. Boylepublic domain
571 F.3d 185 (2009) ARNOLD'S WINES, INC., d/b/a/ Kahn's Fine Wines & Spirits, Buy Rite, Inc., Doing Business as Crown Liquors, Joshua T. Block, Sharon Silber, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel B. BOYLE, Chairman of the New York State Liquor Authority, in his official capacity, Lawrence J. Gedda, Commissioner of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, in his official capacity, New York State Liquor Authority, Defendants-Appellees, Eber
Arnold's Wines, Inc. v. Boylepublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 401 (2007) ARNOLD'S WINES, INC. d/b/a Kahn's Fine Wines & Spirits, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Daniel B. BOYLE, et al., Defendants, and Charmer Industries, Inc., et al., Intervenor-Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 3357 (RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 5, 2007. *402 Michael Robert Reese, Sanfor
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Craig Szemple (A-70-19) (084182) Argued March 2, 2021 -- Decided June 23, 2021 SOLOMON, J., writing for the Court. The Court considers whe
Buy Rite, Inc. v. Boylepublic domain
07-4781-cv Buy Rite, Inc. v. Boyle 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 2008 8 9 (Argued: January 20, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009) 10 11 Docket No. 07-4781-cv 12 13 14 ARNOLD ’S WINES, INC., D /B/A / KAHN ’S FINE WINES & SPIRITS,
Reid v. Boylepublic domain
527 S.E.2d 137 (2000) 259 Va. 356 A. William REID and Rising Tide Productions, Inc. v. John J. BOYLE, et al. John J. Boyle, et al. v. A. William Reid. Record Nos. 990769, 990780. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 3, 2000. *139 Kevin E. Martingayle (Moody E. Stallings, Jr.; Glenn R. Croshaw; Stal
Boyle v. Millionpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 12 Boyle v. Million No. 98-6485 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2000 FED App. 0009P (6th Cir.) File Name: 00a0009p.06 that the defendant himself, i
BCC Merchant Solutions, Inc. v. Jet Pay, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are two separate motions for summary judgment. The first, Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation’s (“Merrick”) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 183) (“Merrick’s MSJ”), asserts, inter ália¡ that Plaintiff BCC Merchant Solutions, Inc. (“BCC”) lacks constitutional and prudential standing to pursue its remaining brea
Boyle v. Boylepublic domain
459 So.2d 735 (1984) Rita Bouterie BOYLE v. William BOYLE. No. CA-1897. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 14, 1984. Writ Denied January 14, 1985. *736 Milton E. Brener, Garon, Brener & McNeely, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee. Harry R. Cabral, Jr., H. Craig Cabral, Cabral &
State of Iowa v. Christopher Craig Thompsonpublic domain
APPEL, Justice (concurring specially). For the reasons expressed below, I conclude the judgment of the district court must be vacated to allow for an in camera inspection of Jherica Richardson’s mental health records under Iowa Code section 622.10(4) (Supp.2011). I write separately, however, to express my views on the important issues raised in this case and in the companion case of State v. Thompson, <
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss filed June 20, 2012 by Defendants Temple-Inland, Inc. (“Temple-Inland”), Kenneth M. Jastrow II (“Jastrow”), Kenneth R. Dubuque (“Dubuque”), Ronald D. Murff (“Murff’), and Craig E. Gifford (“Gifford”) (collectively, “Defendants”) at documents 37, 42, 44, and 47. The Motions seek dismissal of P
Pinkerton v. J&H Reinforcingpublic domain
[Cite as Pinkerton v. J&H Reinforcing, 2012-Ohio-1606.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY CRAIG D. PINKERTON, et al, : : Plaintiffs-Appellants. : : Case Nos. 10CA3386 & v. : 10CA3388
GlobeRanger Corp. v. Software AGpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Software AG USA, Inc. and Software AG, Inc. (together, “SAG”), joined by Nan-*728iq Systems LLC (“Naniq”) (collectively, “Defendants”),1 move for summary judgment on Plaintiff GlobeRanger Corporation’s (“GlobeRanger”) four state law claims, which inc
[Cite as Am. Environmental Group, Ltd. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co. , 2014-Ohio-4681.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100854 AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, LTD. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Boyle v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.public domain
866 P.2d 595 (1993) Ronald M. BOYLE, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee. No. 920760-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. December 23, 1993. *596 David E. Leta (Argued), Paul D. Newman, Jeffrey T. Sivertsen, Snell & Wilmer, Salt Lake City, Gary N. Anderson, Hillyard, An
MEMORANDUM OPINION WENDELIN I. LIPP, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the “Amended Complaint by Lafarge North America, Inc. to Determine Dischargeability of Debt (11 U.S.C. § 528(a)) and to Object to Debtor’s Discharge (11 U.S.C. § 727(a))” (the “Amended Complaint”) and the “Debtor’s Supplemental Answer and Affirmative Defenses to All Counts of Plaintiffs Complaint” (the “Answer”). The Court