Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Craig Alton Thomas”
Alton v. Peak Contractors, Inc.public domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL ALTON, Appellant, v. PEAK CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellee. No. 2D2025-0435 March 27, 2026 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas M. Ramsberger, Judge. Craig L. Berma
Wayne Cottrill v. Craig Kenneth Senterpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 26, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice 139677 Michael F. Cavanag
Jungle Jive, LLC v. Alton Jal, Inc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 15, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1757 Lower Tribunal No. 20-13644-CA-01 ________________ Jungle Jive, LLC, Appellant,
State v. Thomaspublic domain
KEATY, Judge. | defendant, Brian Keith Thomas, appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder, alleging insufficiency of the evidence and that his forty-year sentence is excessive. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction and sentence with instructions. FACTS The victim, T.C. Charles, was shot on two separate occasions on September 2, 2008, in
United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette Evanspublic domain
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge. Appellants Michael Thevis and Global Industries, Inc. [Global] were convicted by a jury of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO], 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Thevis and appellants Anna Jeanette Evans and Alton Bart Hood were convicted of conspiracy to violate the civil rights of Roge
Midwestern Indemnity Co. v. Craigpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 160 This is an appeal from the judgment entries rendered by the Allen County Court of Common Pleas in two declaratory judgment actions pertaining to the availability of underinsured motorist coverage to Jeffrey Gordon ("Gordon") under various insurance policies issued by appellee, GRE Insurance Group, d.b.a. Midwester
Howard Thomas Douglas v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00605-CR 5021070 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
Wall v. City of Durhampublic domain
169 F.Supp.2d 466 (2001) Alton A. WALL, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF DURHAM, Defendant. No. 1:00CV00718. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. October 15, 2001. *467 *468 Lynn Fontana, Durham, NC, for Plaintiff. Thomas H. Lee, Jr., Joel Miller Craig, Newsom, Graham, Hedrick &a;
Maya v. Centex Corp.public domain
658 F.3d 1060 (2011) Sylvester MAYA; Ofer Masachi, as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CENTEX CORPORATION; Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership; CTX Mortgage Company, Defendants-Appellees. Remedios Martinez, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.R. Horton, Inc.; DHI Mortgage Company GP, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Edilbe
Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit Judgespublic domain
640 N.W.2d 567 (2002) 465 Mich. 559 LAPEER COUNTY CLERK and Michigan Association of County Clerks, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LAPEER CIRCUIT JUDGES, Defendants-Appellees, and Lapeer County, Defendant-Appellant. Lapeer County Clerk and Michigan Association of County Clerks, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Lapeer Circuit Judges, Defendants-Appellants, and Lapeer County, Defendant-Appellee. Do
519 F.Supp. 1328 (1981) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Richard Thornburg, individually and in his capacity as Governor, and Edward Biester, individually and in his capacity of Attorney General, Defendants. Civ. A. 79-1531. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. August 11, 1981.
City of Alton v. Hopepublic domain
Mr. Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an action on the case, brought by Thomas M. Hope against the city of Alton, and tried in the circuit court of Madison county. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $200. The following plat, which was in evidence, shows the lots owned by the plaintiff, where the damage was d
Schmidt v. Craigpublic domain
354 S.W.2d 292 (1962) Craig R. SCHMIDT et al., Appellants, v. C. Thomas CRAIG et al., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 16, 1962. H. B. Kinsolving, III, Kinsolving & Kinsolving, Shelbyville, for appellants. Bernard B. Davis, Shelbyville, for appellees. STEWART, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Shelby Circuit Court, affi
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. People ex rel. Cooleypublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the Court: The question presented by this record is, whether the strip of land 100 feet wide and 1472 feet in length, extending from the main track in and to the stone quarry, known as the “Quarry track,” is, within the meaning of the Eevenue law, “railroad track,” or is it real estate of the railroad company other than railroad
Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Companypublic domain
WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority opinion that courts retain the power to sanction attorneys after a remand to state court. But in my view, so did the district court. The district court rightfully understood that it generally could sanction the parties here — that is why it denied, instead of dismis
OPINION Opinion by Justice Rodriguez Appellant Kingsley Properties LP (Kingsley) appeals from a final judgment in favor of appellees San Jacinto Title Services of Corpus Christi, LLC; San Jacinto Title Services of Texas, LLC; and Mark Scott, the local president of San Jacinto (collectively, San Jacinto). By two issues, Kingsley contends that the trial court erred in: (1) awarding attorney’
Cook v. Naveaupublic domain
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on authority of Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 221, 611 N.E.2d 789, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Nabors Offshore Corp. v. Caterpillar Inc.public domain
LANDRIEU, J., CONCURS WITH REASONS 1!Appellate courts exercise, or decliné to exercise, supervisory jurisdiction with respect to interlocutory judgments. Final judgments, however, are appealable and are therefore reviewed by the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. See La. C.C.P. art. 2083; In re Succession of Scheuermann, 2015-0040, pp. 2-3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/22/15), 171 So.3d 975, 977-78. As the
66 F.3d 659 John T. HENNESSY; Michael B. High; William A. Bracken;Larry Gibson; Martha C. Hitchcock; Laurence A.Liss; Ken Mancini; George S. Rapp;Roberta Griffin Torian; Frank J. Sorierov.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver forMeritor Savings Bank (D.C. Civil No. 93-cv-05589).Thomas CALLAHANv.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver forMeritor Savings Bank (D.C. Civil No. 94-cv
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed February 4, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00659-CV CITY OF MCKINNEY, TEXAS, Appellant V. KLA INTERNATIONAL SPORTS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas