Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01472-SCT MAYOR OKOLOISE, M.D. AND HOPE MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC v. WILLIAM FRANKLIN YOST, M.D. AND DOCTOR’S MEDICAL CENTER OF PICAYUNE, PLLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/25/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. RONALD DOLEAC TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: PAUL MANION ANDERSON L. CLARK HICKS, JR.

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Eric Havely ("Mr. Havely"), and Donna Havely, individually and as guardian for Mr. Havely (collectively, "appellants"), appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Franklin County Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities ("FCMRDD"), Carol Thomas ("Thomas"), Mathia

This is an action in procedendo arising as a result of the refusal of the Franklin County Municipal Court to certify to the Common Pleas Court an action involving a third-party petition in excess of the monetary jurisdictional limits of the Municipal Court, and wherein the relator requests this court to direct respondents Franklin County Municipal Court and Judge Kenneth L. Sater to vacate the judgment of the trial court and certify the action to the Common Pleas Court. Procedendo is a

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Keith Crabbs filed a § 1983 claim alleging that the local police violated his Fourth (and Fourteenth) Amendment right to be secure from unreasonable searches. But he died before the ease could be resolved. Anne Crabbs, Keith’s mother and the personal representative of his estate, filed a motion to substitute as a party. The

*428 OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Keith Crabbs sued the Franklin County Sheriff under the Fourth (and Fourteenth) Amendment for requiring him to submit to a DNA cheek swab after a jury acquitted him of voluntary manslaughter. The sheriff responded that Ohio’s sovereign immunity i

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge Plaintiff Consumer Finance Protection Bureau contends that defendants Thomas G. Macey, Jeffrey J. Aleman, Jason E. Searns, Harold E. Stafford, The Mortgage Legal Group, LLP and Consumer First Legal Group, LLC violated various provisions of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and 12 C.F.R. part 215 (commonly known as Regulation 0) in providing mortg

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge Plaintiff Consumer Finance Protection Bureau brought this action against two defunct firms and four lawyers associated with those firms, alleging violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and 12 C.F.R. part 215, which is commonly called Regulation O. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that while providing mortgage relief services to more th

OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge Plaintiff Consumer Finance Protection Bureau brought this action against two defunct companies and four lawyers associated with those companies, alleging violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and 12 C.F.R. part 215, which *926is commonly called Regulation 0. Specifically, plai

620 F.Supp.2d 966 (2009) Franklin C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff, v. OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 139, Defendant. No. 08-cv-567-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. June 1, 2009. *967 Franklin C. Edmonds, Madison, WI, pro se. *968 Brian C. Hlavin, Baum Sigman Auerbach & Neuman, Lt

[Cite as Curry v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., 2020-Ohio-2693.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Carline Curry, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-618 (C.P.C. No. 18CV-2188) v. :

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. In this civil action for monetary relief, plaintiff Terri Beal contends that defendant Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, the Wisconsin Consumer Act, Wis. Stat. §§ 427-428, and Wisconsin common law in attempting to collect a debt that plaintiff owed defendant for the purchase of timeshare po

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiff Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. and its two co-presidents, plaintiffs Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker, brought this lawsuit under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, contending that certain federal income tax exemptions received by “ministers of the gospel” under 26 U.S.C. § 107 violate the establishment clause of the

724 F.Supp.2d 981 (2010) RIDDELL, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHUTT SPORTS, INC., Defendant. No. 08-cv-711-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. July 19, 2010. Opinion Granting Motion for Clarification July 28, 2010. *983 Christopher G. Hanewicz, Perkins Coie LLP, Madison, WI, Debra R. Bernard, Perkins Coie

OPINION and ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Wisconsin Resources Protection Council, Center for Biological Diversity and Laura Gauger bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief and civil penalties under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1). Plaintiffs contend that defendant Flambeau Mining Company is violating the Clean Water Act by discharg

FROELICH, J. {¶ 1} Catherine A. Karras appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas which granted Terry Karras's motion for summary judgment on various issues pertaining to the title of several parcels of land located on Wilmington Pike and found that Catherine Karras did not have any ownership interest in those parcels. Backgroun

469 F.Supp.2d 655 (2007) State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. AMGEN, INC., Abbott Laboratories, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca, LP, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aventis Behring, LLC, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Dey, Inc., Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Glaxosmithkline, Inc., Immunex Corporation, Ivax

656 F.Supp.2d 898 (2009) WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 08-cv-78-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. September 17, 2009. *901 Azar Mouzari, Alan J. Heinrich, Benjamin T. Wang, Blake B. Greene, Ellisen Shelton Turner, Gary N. Frischling, Jason Sheasby, Morgan Ch

313 F.Supp.2d 939 (2004) Selinda OWENS, Plaintiff, v. Enis RAGLAND, Defendant. No. 03-C-369-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. April 12, 2004. *940 Robert J. Gingras, for Plaintiff. John M. Moore, Bell, Gierhart & Moore, S.C., Madison, WI, for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER CRABB, Di

PER CURIAM. Sheila Spencer stopped paying her mortgage in 2008 and soon faced a foreclosure action in Wisconsin state court. The case progressed normally until Spencer retained attorney Wendy Nora, who adopted an object-to-everything litigation strategy and buried the state court in a blizzard of motions. When a hearing on a summary judgment motion loomed in state court, Nora remo

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellants, Mary Hamrick, 1 Roger Hamrick, and Marie Schooley (separately "the Hamricks" and "Schooley," and collectively "appellants"), filed this appeal seeking reversal of a judgment by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting motions for summary judgment in favor of appellees, Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") and Safe Auto Insurance Company ("Sa