Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Coy v. Focus Healthcare Management, Inc.”
Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.public domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.public domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
586 F.3d 500 (2009) SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. SCHWARZ PHARMA, INC. and Kremers Urban, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Paddock Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 09-1438, 09-1462, 09-1601. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 15,
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 09-1438, 09-1462, 09-1601 S CHERING-P LOUGH H EALTHCARE P RODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. S CHWARZ P HARMA, INC. and K REMERS U RBAN, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, B RECKENRIDGE P HARMACEUTICALS, INC. and P ADDOCK L ABORATORIES, INC.,
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.public domain
Justice ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. *599 Our decisions in Nollan v. California CoastalComm'n, 483 U.S. 825 ,
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2012 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trumppublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Revisions: 2/23/26public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Extendicare Homes, Inc. v. Whismanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS This decision consolidates three cases accepted by this Court for discretionary review pursuant to CR 65.09. By -way of motions for interlocutory relief under CR 65.09, Extendicare Homes, Inc. d/b/a/ Shady Lawn Nursing Home (“Extendi-care”), and its affiliated entities,1- and Kindred Nursing - Centers Limited Partnership d/b/a Winchester Centre
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
in Re: Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM
Zutrau v. Jansing and ICE Systems, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEILANI ZUTRAU individually and on behalf of ICE SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 7457-VCP JOHN C. JANSING, Defendant, and ICE SYSTEMS, INC. Nominal Defendant. OPINION Submitted: November 21, 2013
Cason-Merenda v. VHS of Michigan, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this federal antitrust suit, the Plaintiff registered nurses (“RNs”), Pat Cason-Mer-enda and Jeffrey A. Suhre, seek to recover on behalf of themselves and a class of RNs against eight Detroit-area hospitals, alleging in their two-count Third Correcte
Oak Mortgage Group, Inc. Michael H. Nasserfar Michael E. Task And Tycord R. Gosnay v. Ameripro Funding, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
First State Orthopaedics v. Concentra, Inc.public domain
534 F.Supp.2d 500 (2007) FIRST STATE ORTHOPAEDICS, Roy Lerman, M.D. and all others similarly situated v. CONCENTRA, INC., Concentra Managed Care, Inc. and Focus Healthcare Management, Inc. Civil Action No. 05-4951. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 16, 2007. *501 *502
Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER * GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. These consolidated bid protests arise out of the United States Air Force’s (“Air Force’s”) exercise of options on four of six indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“ID/IQ”) contracts to supply health care service providers. Plaintiffs Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. (“Magnum Opus”) and The Healing Staff, Inc. (“Healing Staff
Portnoy v. Cryo-Cell International, Inc.public domain
940 A.2d 43 (2008) David PORTNOY, Plaintiff, v. CRYO-CELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., A Delaware corporation, Mercedes Walton, Gaby W. Goubran, Jagdish Sheth, Ph.D., Anthony P. Finch and Scott Christian, Defendants. C.A. No. 3142-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: November 30, 2007. Decided: January 15, 2008. *45</
Mercier v. Inter-Tel (Delaware), Inc.public domain
929 A.2d 786 (2007) Vernon A. MERCIER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTER-TEL (DELAWARE), INCORPORATED, Norman Stout, Alexander Cappello, J. Robert Anderson, Jerry W. Chapman, Gary D. Edens, Steven E. Karol, Robert Rodin and Agnieszka Winkler, Defendants. C.A. No. 2226-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: August 8, 2007. Decided: August 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2020-3605 _____________________________ SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellants, v. JENNIFER CHAVEZ and MARLON CHAVEZ as Parents and Natural Guardians of G.C., a Minor Child, and FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, Appe
Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. Statepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Read, J. The issue in these appeals is whether plaintiffs have stated a viable cause of action to challenge the legislation authorizing the conversion of defendant Empire HealthChoice, Inc., doing business as Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Empire) from a not-for-profit to a for-profit corporation, and directing that certain of Empire’s