Cases

[Cite as U.S. Bank Trust NA Natl. Assn. v. Sarver, 2024-Ohio-1303.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT US BANK TRUST NA NATIONAL : JUDGES: ASSOC. : :

USCA11 Case: 19-14689 Date Filed: 05/27/2021 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-14689 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-23136-MGC ESTATE OF PHYLLIS M. MALKIN, By its P

OPINION HUDDLESTON, Judge. Bank One Kentucky NA, formerly known as Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Kentucky, appeals from an order dismissing its petition for a declaration of rights under a loan agreement and mortgage between it and other banks, as obligees, and LHR-Partners, Ltd., as obligor. Jefferson Circuit Court dismissed the petition on the ground that no justiciable controversy w

160 P.3d 17 (2007) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Respondent, v. PRESTANCE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; Prestance Japan Corporation, a Japanese corporation; Sakae and Yuko Sugihara, husband and wife, Defendants, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association; and Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A., a national banking association, Petitioners. No. 77038-7. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Plaintiff Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (“plaintiff’ or “PABF”) brings this putative class action against defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) and U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank” and, with BofA, “defendants”) in their capacity as trustees for forty-one trusts of residential mortgage-backed secu

351 S.C. 287 (2002) 569 S.E.2d 371 Dr. J. Gray MACAULAY, James C. Perrin, Gladys L. Perrin, Neill M. Perrin, Mary P. Coxe, Joanne M. Cauthen, Dr. Neill W. Macaulay, Rebecca M. Clark, Theodica M. Greene, Henrietta M. Marett, Kathryn D. Durham, William B. DePass, Jr., Wilkes D. Macaulay, Kathryn M. Bishop, Isabel M. Schell, and Dr. Hugh H. Macaulay, Jr., Respondents, v. WACHOVIA BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, N.A., Estate of Sara M

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PURVI GANDHI-KAPOOR, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0881-JTL ) HONE CAPITAL LLC AND CSC ) UPSHOT VENTURES I, L.P., ) ) Responde

CHARLES R. JONES, Chief Judge. | rThe Appellant, Joseph Cox d/b/a Glo-borx, Inc., seeks review of the judgment of the First City Court (city court) granting the Petition for Eviction of the Appellees, Cory R. Cahn, Mike Cahn, III, Whitney Cahn, Sandra Cahn, and Capital One Bank, NA, Trustee of the Cahn Trust, represented by Snappy Jacobs, CCIM Real Estate Management, LLC. Finding that the city court did not err in granting

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PURVI GANDHI-KAPOOR, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0881-JTL ) HONE CAPITAL LLC AND CSC ) UPSHOT VENTURES I, L.P., ) ) Responde

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ Nos. 18-2317 _______________ NORTH SOUND CAPITAL LLC; NORTH SOUND LEGACY INTERNATIONAL; NORTH SOUND LEGACY INSTITUTIONAL; UNITED FOOD COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 500 PENSION FUND; COLONIAL FIRST STATE INVESTMENTS LTD.; CFSIL-CFS WHOLESALE INDEXED GLOBAL SHARE FUND; CFSIL-COMMONWEALTH GLOBAL SHARES FUND 4; C

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Motion [100] to Dismiss filed by Hess Corporation, the Motion [207] to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Certain Defendants,1 *852the Motion [208] to Dismiss filed by the Coal Compan

Emigrant Bank v Cohen (2022 NY Slip Op 02532) Emigrant Bank v Cohen 2022 NY Slip Op 02532 Decided on April 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Dillon, J., J. Published by New York State Law Repo

¶1 Schindler, J. During the one-year redemption period under chapter 6.23 RCW, a licensed real estate broker may list property sold at a sheriff’s sale. If the property is not redeemed by the judgment debtor at the end of the one-year period, the purchaser at the sheriff’s sale shall accept the highest qualifying offer as defined under RCW 6.23.120(1). On cross motions for summary judgment,

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District G. STEVEN COX, ) ) Appellant, ) WD76616 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: August 5, 2014 ) KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL

Judgment rendered October 2, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,854-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL Plai

425 So.2d 415 (1982) FIRST ALABAMA BANK OF MONTGOMERY, N.A. v. Charlotte Kyle MARTIN, Kathleen Gerson, Gloria Alleta Parker, and Virginia G. Weldon. 80-853. Supreme Court of Alabama. August 20, 1982. As Modified on Rehearing January 14, 1983. *417 M.R. Nachman, Jr., R.E. Steiner, III, and Eric G. Bruggink of Stei

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

The opinion of the court was delivered by SABATINO, J.A.D. This appeal concerns whether a refinancing lender that discharges its own previous mortgage and issues another mortgage loan for a higher amount, and which simultaneously pays off the balance owed on a junior lienor’s line of credit without having it closed, can rely upon equitable principles to maintain its priority

Cox, J. ¶1 — Frances Graham, Scott Bingham, Kelly Bingham, Christopher Bingham, Cherish Bingham, David Bingham, Sharon Bingham, and Bingo Investments LLC (collectively “the guarantors”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Union Bank. There are no genuine issues of material fact regarding either the validity or the enforceability of the guaranties they signed. Likewi

*293MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: Plaintiff Deborah Moss (“Moss” or “plaintiff’) brings this putative class action against defendant First Premier Bank1 (“First Premier” or “defendant”) alleging (1) a. substantive violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt. Organizations (“RICO”) Act pursuant