Cases

Filed 8/24/22 (unmodified opn. attached) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF BUTTE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, Defendant and Respondent; STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. COUNTY OF PLUMAS et al., Plaintiffs and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF BUTTE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, Defendant and Respondent; STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. COUNTY OF PLUMAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES,

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER SCULLIN, Senior Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Butte County’s (“Plaintiff County”) motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 115; Defendants’ (collectively the “United States” or the “Department”) cross-motion for summary judgment, see

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Congress determined in enacting the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) that Indian tribes restored to federal recognition may be eligible for a restoration of lands on which gaming is permitted. 25 U.S.C. § 2719(b)(l)(B)(iii); see also id, § 465. At issue is whether the decisions of the Secretary of the Interior and the National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”) gra

598 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2009) The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF LA PLATA, COLORADO, Plaintiff, v. BROWN GROUP RETAIL, INC., Plummer Precision Optics Co., Blue Jaunte Company, Inc., and Plummer Precision Optics Western Division, Inc., Defendants. Civil Case No. 08-cv-00855-LTB-KMT. United States District Court, D. Colorado. February 18, 2009.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SNOW PHIPPS GROUP, LLC, and ) DECOPAC HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterclaim ) Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0282-KSJM ) KCAKE ACQUISITION, INC.,

*1325 Opinion GOMES, J. This tax refund case concerns supplemental assessments of new construction consisting of the drilling, development, and completion of oil and gas wells, and related improvements and facilities, on various oil and gas properties operated by Chevron USA, Inc.

489 N.W.2d 829 (1992) 241 Neb. 588 Don MILES and Barbara Miles, Natural Parents and Next Friends of Traig William Miles, a Minor Child, Appellees, v. BOX BUTTE COUNTY, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision, Doing Business as Box Butte General Hospital, Appellant. No. S-89-310. Supreme Court of Nebraska. October 2, 1992.

JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Comerica Bank appeals a jury verdict and judgment rendered in favor of Masters Group International, Inc. in the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County. We restate the determinative issues on appeal as follows: 1. Whether the District Court abused its discretion by denying

NAHMIAS, Justice. In March 2015, McHugh Fuller Law Group, PLLC (“McHugh Fuller”) began running a month-long, statewide Georgia advertising campaign targeting PruittHealth, Inc., f/k/a Pruitt Corporation and its affiliated nursing homes (collectively, “PruittHealth”). Pruitt-Health filed suit against McHugh Fuller under Georgia’s trademark anti-dilution statute, OCGA § 10-1-451 (b), in the Superior Court of Colquitt County, and

JUSTICE COTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Renee Griffith (Griffith) appeals from an order entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, granting summary judgment in favor of Butte School District No. 1 (School District), Charles Uggetti (Uggetti), and John Metz (Metz). She appeals the District Court’s conclusion that her claims were

OPINION MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief Judge. This case is before the court for ruling on the Combined Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (# 90) filed by Defendants, Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Europe SA. This *818court has carefully reviewed the arguments of the parties and t

Opinion MALLANO, P. J. —Under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16), “arbitration is a matter of contract.” (Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Co. (1960) 363 U.S. 574, 582 [4 L.Ed.2d 1409, 80 S.Ct. 1347]; accord, 9 U.S.C. § 2.) An arbitration contract typically consists of the parties’ mutual promises to arbitrate their claims against each other. In this

172 Cal.App.3d 848 (1985) 218 Cal. Rptr. 613 COUNTY OF BUTTE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN N. BACH et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF BUTTE COUNTY et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants; CARL MORTON et al., Cross-defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants. Docket No. 23325. Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Opinion FRANSON, J.— INTRODUCTION The County of Kern (County) 1 sued defendants to enjoin the operation of a medical marijuana dispensary in an unincorporated area of Kern County. The trial court granted a preliminary injunction. Defendants appealed. Th

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court. Pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1, we agreed to answer the following questions certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit: What standard of care governs the duty owed by ski lift operators in Colorado to users of those lifts in the winter season? Separately, and more particularly, does the Colorado Passenger

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 833 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 834 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

Filed 8/8/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE JAMES V. LACY et al., A165899 Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CPF-22-517714) CITY AND COU

Filed 3/7/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT V LIONS FARMING, LLC, et al., F084763, F085102, F085220 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. Nos. BCV-15-101645, v. BCV-15-