Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Count US IN v. Diego Morales”
Count US IN v. Diego Moralespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 26-1783 COUNT US IN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DIEGO MORALES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
Diego Morales v. John Rustpublic domain
IN THE FILED Indiana Supreme Court Mar 06 2024, 2:47 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
State v. Diego Morales Peregrinapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 35115 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) 2010 Opinion No. 19 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Filed: March 24, 2010 v. ) ) Stephen W. Ken
In Re Count Liberty, LLCpublic domain
370 B.R. 259 (2007) In re COUNT LIBERTY, LLC, and West-All Properties, LLC, Debtors. Nos. RS 04-19353 PC, RS 04-19355 PC. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California, Riverside Division. May 4, 2007. *260 *261 *262 Dennis Winters, Esq., Winters Law Firm, Santa
United States v. Nicolas Morales-Gutierrezpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4077 Doc: 105 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
US Dominion, Inc. v. Herring Networks, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-02130 (CJN) HERRING NETWORKS, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION US Dominion, Inc. and other related corporate entities claim that One America News Network (“OAN”), as well as four o
People of Guam v. Danilo Santos Moralespublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANILO SANTOS MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA19-004 Superior Court Case No.: CF0744-16 OPINION
United States v. Abrahan Garcia-Moralespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 17-50323 Plaintiff-Appellee, 17-50324 v. D.C. Nos. 3:16-cr-01611-CAB-1 ABRAHAN GARCIA-MORALES, 3:14-cr-02586-CAB-1 AKA Abraham Garcia- Morales, OPINION Defenda
San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yeepublic domain
O'ROURKE, J. *725Plaintiffs and appellants San Diego Unified School District, Clovis Unified School District, Poway Unified School District, San *726Jose Unified School District, Newport-Mesa Unified School District, and Grossmont Union High School Distric
San Diego Unified School Dist. v. Yeepublic domain
Filed 11/30/18; Certified for Publication 12/27/18 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL D072894 DISTRICT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. v.
United States v. Lorena Moralespublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge. Lorena Morales was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to knowingly *1063 distribute a controlled substance and one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The district court 1 senten
United States v. Garcia-Moralespublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT DUE TO INVALID DEPORTATION Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Jose Luis Garcia-Morales’ (“Defendant”) October 16, 2015 motion to dismiss his indictment due to invalid deportation. Def. Mot., ECF No. 33. The motion has been fully briefed. Pl. Resp., ECF No. 34; Def. Reply, ECF No. 35. Upon consideration of the movin
United States v. Morales-Landapublic domain
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge. Defendant Javier Morales-Landa has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Javier Morales-Landa (“Defendant”) is a citizen of Mexico without legal status in the United States. On Marc
Edward Peruta v. County of San Diegopublic domain
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting, in which SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge, joins as to all parts except section IV, BEA, Circuit Judge, joins, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge, joins as to all parts except section II.B: The Second Amendment is not a “second-class” constitutional guarantee. See McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 780, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010). I
Hayes v. County of San Diegopublic domain
Opinion KENNARD, J. Sheriffs deputies shot and killed Shane Hayes when he came toward them with a large knife in his raised right hand. The deputies had come to the home in response to a call from a neighbor who said she had heard screaming. When the deputies arrived, Shane’s girlfriend, Geri Neill, told them that earlier in the evening, Shane had tried to k
Trunk v. City of San Diegopublic domain
629 F.3d 1099 (2011) Steve TRUNK, Plaintiff, and Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc.; Richard A. Smith; Mina Sagheb; Judith M. Copeland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; United States of America; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants-Appellees. *1100 Steve Trunk, Philip K. Paulson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Richard A. Smith; Mina Sagheb; Judith M. Cop
United States v. Espinoza-Moralespublic domain
621 F.3d 1141 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvin ESPINOZA-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 2010. Filed September 10, 2010. *1142 Doug Keller, Federal Defenders of San Diego, CA, for defendant-appellant
Mitchell v. US Airways, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Over the course of the last century, airlines have been subject to varying levels of oversight by different regulatory bodies. The first significant national legislation regarding commercial aviation was the Air Commerce Act of 1926, vesting regulatory authority in the Secretary of Commerce to ensure air safety, a
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Sep 25 2018, 9:14 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK Indiana Supreme Court purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, Court
Morales v. Ashcroftpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Petitioner-Appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. Petitioner-Appellant Jaime Armando Morales (“Morales”) is a citizen of Mexico. He became a lawful permanent resident of the United States in 1988. On September 19, 1996, Morales pleaded guilty to grand theft auto, and received a sentence of three yea