Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cosgrove v. Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services”
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge. In this complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff contends defendants violated his constitutional rights by acts related to his placement in an abusive foster home when he was a child. The case comes before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss the case. Plaintiff opposes the motions. Background
Ct. App. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.
Ct. App. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.
Abbott, C.J.: In 1986, Elisa Cosgrove’s (and her former husband’s) parental rights were severed as to L.C. and C.C. That decision was affirmed by this court on appeal in In re Lori C., *218unpublished opinion No. 60,346, filed July 8, 1988, rev. denied 243 Kan. 778. In March 1989, Mrs. Cosgrove filed a petition for habeas corpus. She a
Cosgrove v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & REHABILITATIVE SVCS.public domain
744 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2010) Charles Patrick COSGROVE, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATIVE (sic) SERVICES, Donna Whiteman, Michael Vanlandingham, Lois Mitchell, Sydney Kraft, Alberta Brumley and Delmar Brumley, Defendants. Case No. 07-2125-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 29, 2010. *1181
TINDER, Circuit Judge. Harlis Woods brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (“IDCFS”), Lutheran Child and Family Services of Illinois, Inc. (“LCFS”), and various individuals. He alleged that defendants violated his due process rights when, twenty years earlier, they took him into state custody and failed to protect
M.N. v. Department of Children & Family Servicespublic domain
WALLACE, Judge. M.N. (the Father) appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his three children, C.N., M.N., and D.N., based on the material breach of a case plan under section 39.806(l)(e)(2), Florida Statutes (2008).1 The Father breached case plan tasks requiring him to commit no further law violations and to avoid further involvement in crimes of violence. Although th
Et v. State, Dept. of Children and Fams.public domain
930 So.2d 721 (2006) E.T., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellees. No. 4D04-1450. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 3, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 29, 2006. *722 Valentin Rodriguez of Valentin Rodriguez, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. <
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Spiess v. Meyerspublic domain
483 F.Supp.2d 1082 (2007) Dale E. SPIESS, Plaintiff, v. Keith MEYERS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-2175-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 10, 2007. *1083 *1084 *1085 Alan V. Johnson, Sloan, Eisenbarth, Glassman, McEntire & J
MORENO-GUTIERREZ v. Napolitanopublic domain
794 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2011) Candelaria MORENO-GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Perry Rhew, Chief, Administrative Appeals Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Daniel Renaud, Director, Vermont Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1
Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.public domain
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge *988Plaintiffs Steve Tronsgard and Medbor Chavez are former insurance agents for defendants-a group of entities that plaintiffs call "the Farm Bureau family of companies." Doc. 41 at 12. The four defendants named in plaintiffs' Complaint are: (1) FBL Financial Group, Inc. ("FBL Financial"); (2) Farm Bureau Property &
Brady v. Cintronpublic domain
*809OPINION OF THE COURT (September 27, 2011) Hodge, Chief Justice. Dr. Raymond Cintron performed a colonoscopy on Gwendolyn Brady on June 19, 2004. It was later determined that during that procedure Brady sustained a perforation to her colon requiring emergency surgery. Although Brady may have suffered very real injuries as a
Varnell v. Dora Consolidated School Districtpublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Amber Shaw coached Plaintiff Tori Var-nell in several sports while she was a student in the Dora Consolidated School District (Dora Schools). According to Plaintiff, Shaw sexually abused her for more than a year, ending while she was in the ninth grade, sometime in late 2006 or early 2007. On May 24, 2012, when Plaintiff was 20, she sued Ms. Shaw, Dora Scho
Klaassen v. Atkinsonpublic domain
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This case is a highly contentious employment dispute. Plaintiff Curtis Klaassen, Ph.D., served as a tenured professor at the University of Kansas Medical Center ("KUMC") until KUMC fired him in 2014. Dr. Klaassen brings this lawsuit against KUMC and various current and former KUMC officials. He alleges that defendants retaliated against him because he criticized KUMC for financial mis
Johnson v. Guhlpublic domain
91 F.Supp.2d 754 (2000) Donald H. JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michele K. GUHL, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants. No. 99-CIV.-5403 WGB. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 7, 2000. *755 *756 *757
Arche v. United Statespublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Miller, C.J.: This is a medical malpractice wrongful birth action brought in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas by John and Nicole Arche against the United States of America, Department of the Army. Chief Judge Earl E. O’Connor of the United States District Court has certified the following questions for resolution by this court pursuant to th
In Re CNpublic domain
51 So.3d 1224 (2011) In the Interest of C.N., M.N., and D.N., children. M.N., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Family Services and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees. No. 2D10-2086. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 14, 2011. *1225 Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for Appellant. Pame