Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Corzin v. Harvey”
State v. Harveypublic domain
944 A.2d 22 (2008) 194 N.J. 259 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathaniel HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 7, 2008. This matter having come before the Court on defendant's post-conviction relief appeal as of right from a sentence of death pursuant to Rule 2:2-1(a)(3), and Governor Jon S. Corzine having co
Gold v. Pasternak (In Re Harvey Goldman & Co.)public domain
455 B.R. 621 (2011) In re HARVEY GOLDMAN & COMPANY, a/k/a Worldwide Equipment Company, Debtor. Stuart A. Gold, trustee of the Adversary Proceeding Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of Harvey Goldman & Company, Plaintiff, v. Abraham Pasternak and Geraldine Pasternak, individually, and as trustees of the Abraham and Geraldine Pasternak Irrevocable Living Trust, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-62501. Adversary No. 11-05504-
Baldridge v. Baldridgepublic domain
Brian S. Miller, Judge. This appeal arises from a divorce decree entered by the Faulkner County Circuit Court equally dividing, as marital property, twenty acres of land between appellant Bill Baldridge and appellee Susan Baldridge. We affirm. It is undisputed that Susan and Bill Baldridge were married on May 5, 1989, and separated in December 2005. During their marr
Prasad v. George Washington Universitypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICCA PRASAD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-01779 (ABJ/GMH) THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ricca Prasad (“Plaintiff”) w
Glazewski v. Corzinepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. Vincent Glazewski, a New Jersey state inmate, appeals pro se from the District Court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Because Glazewski’s appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm. I. In August 2006, Glazewski filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of
Slone v. Lassiter (In Re Grove-Merritt)public domain
406 B.R. 778 (2009) In re Devon Loraine GROVE-MERRITT aka, Devon L. Dullaghan, Debtor. Ruth A. Slone, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Harvey Christophe Lassiter, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-31887. Adversary No. 08-3068. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. June 2, 2009. *784 Harvey Christophe Lassite
United States v. Pickardpublic domain
ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. It has been forty-five years since Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act, including marijuana in Schedule I. Defendants say the law as passed can no longer stand. The government says that is not for this court to decide. To say the landscape with respect to marijuana has changed significantly since 1970, in many ways, is an understatement. While the court
Robinson v. Salazarpublic domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Doc. 136, 137, 139) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, United States Magistrate Judge. Three motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) are pending before this Court: (1) motion by defendant Ken Salazar, in his capacity as the Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior (doc. 136), (2) motion by County of Kern (doc. 137), and (3) motion by Tejón Mountain Village, L
Proctor v. Applegatepublic domain
661 F.Supp.2d 743 (2009) Fred Cortland PROCTOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. L. APPLEGATE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-12414. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 30, 2009. *753 Fred Proctor, Coldwater, MI, pro se. Perry Alva Hurd, Jr., Manitou Beach, MI, pro se. Gilbert Jividen, M
Major Tours, Inc. v. Colorelpublic domain
799 F.Supp.2d 376 (2011) MAJOR TOURS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael COLOREL, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-3091 (JBS/JS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 29, 2011. Opinion Denying Reconsideration October 11, 2011. *382 Terry Davon Johnson, Esq., Blank Rome LLP, Princeton, NJ, and Ezra
Harper v. Johnsonpublic domain
61 Ill. App.3d 190 (1978) 377 N.E.2d 1288 HARRISON G. HARPER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAUL JOHNSON Indiv. and d/b/a Land of Lincoln Real Estate Investments, Ltd., Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-161. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed June 23, 1978. Michael T. Nigro, of Kalinich, McClusky & Mehling, of Glen Ellyn, f
Kipperman v. Onex Corp.public domain
411 B.R. 805 (2009) Richard M. KIPPERMAN, Plaintiff, v. ONEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-1242-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 13, 2009. *813 Benjamin Aaron Lee, Daniel James King, Catherine M. O'Neil, King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Catherine Steege, A
Alice v. Ronaldpublic domain
683 S.W.2d 307 (1984) ALICE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RONALD, Defendant-Respondent. No. 13601. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Three. December 19, 1984. *308 James E. Reeves, Ward & Reeves, Caruthersville, for plaintiffs-appellants. John R. Fowlkes, Caruthersville, Jimmy D. Collins, Memp
United States v. Phillip Troutmanpublic domain
SAM, District Judge. Phillip E. Troutman appeals his conviction, following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, on conspiracy to commit extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. 1 Troutman seeks reversal and remand on the ground the district court erred by r
Lovejoy v. Cockrellpublic domain
HARVEY, Judge. This is a suit by Mrs. Mary O. Lovejoy, surviving wife of John Lovejoy, deceased, and the residuary devisees named in the will of the deceased, to recover of the defendant in error, Ernest Cockrell, an undivided half of a tract of five acres of land in Chambers county. The case went to trial before a jury, but at the conclusion of the testimony, the trial court ruled that no jury question was raised by the t
Hafford v. Smithpublic domain
369 S.W.2d 290 (1963) Curtis B. HAFFORD and Virginia L. Hafford, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Wayne L. SMITH and Connie Smith, his wife, Dave R. Ashmore and Lillian R. Ashmore, his wife, and Joplin Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n., Defendants-Respondents. No. 8148. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. June 19, 1963. *291
Lampier v. Leypublic domain
The original plaintiffs in this suit, or some of them, after they, with possibly others (the record not clearly disclosing), had been made defendants in a cross-action, filed by the original defendants, took a nonsuit. The original defendants Homer E. Ley, Wendel D. Ley, and E. V. Ley will hereinafter be regarded and referred to as the plaintiffs, and Tucker Lampier, with a number of others, being the heirs of Marguerite Lambert, will be regarded and hereinafter referred to as the defendants.
McDonald v. Galtpublic domain
Ed E. Galt and Myra Galt were husband and wife and acquired as community property the 395 acres of land in controversy. Ed Galt died intestate on November 30, 1925, and an administration on the estate being necessary, his said wife qualified as administratrix through proceedings in the Probate Court of Franklin County, on January 28, 1926. The probate proceedings are now, and have been since last named date, pending in such court, in which the claim of National Life Accident In
Ludtke v. Houston Lumber & Building Co.public domain
Appellant was plaintiff in the court below, and sued appellee in trespass to try title to two acres of land situated on the north side of Buffalo bayou in the city of Houston, being a part of the Harris and Wilson two-league grant in Harris county. The defendant, appellant, answered by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of not guilty. It also impleaded its warrantors, Frank B. Browne, Hugh Bridges, and J. S. Walker, and by cross-action sued plaintiff in trespass to try title fo
White v. Orndorffpublic domain
This appeal is from the judgments entered in the trial court in cause No. 24221, Frank M. Murchison v. P. E. Kern et al., and No. 24224, Lee H. Orndorff v. P. E. Kern et al., consolidated and tried together by agreement of the parties. In the above cases Lee H. Orndorff, appellee here, plaintiff below, and Frank M. Murchison, appellee here, plaintiff below, brought suit against appellants in trespass to try title for property embraced in their respective petitions, sufficiently describ