⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Corning Co., Inc.”

Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017-09-01 · Published · cited 0× · 249 So. 3d 478
SELLERS, Justice. Dow Corning Alabama, Inc., Dow Corning Corporation, Rajesh Mahadasyam, Fred McNett, Zurich American Insurance Company ("Zurich"), and National Union Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union"), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to transfer the underlying declaratory-judgment action to the Montgomery Circuit Court pursuant to § 6-3-21.1, Ala. Code 1975, the forum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 132 A.D.3d 1285; 17 N.Y.S.3d 357
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered September 22, 2014. The judgment, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment and denied the motion of defendants for partial summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 132 A.D.3d 1285; 17 N.Y.S.3d 357
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered September 22, 2014. The judgment, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment and denied the motion of defendants for partial summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decis
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 714 F. App'x 1022
JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-08-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 04829
Matter of Parkway Elderly Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc. v Assessor of City of Corning (2021 NY Slip Op 04829) Matter of Parkway Elderly Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc. v Assessor of City of Corning 2021 NY Slip Op 04829 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fo
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 560 B.R. 229; 76 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1224; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3923; 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 111; 2016 WL 6695778
*231OPINION RE MOTION OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR ACCESS TO RULE 2019 EXHIBITS KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. Honeywell International, Inc. has moved for an order (the “Motion”) authorizing “any entity ... including Honeywell ... [to] access, inspect, copy and receive copies of ... any and all of the 2019 Exhibits filed with the Court in compliance with
District Court, W.D. New York · 2008-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 590 F. Supp. 2d 418; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96102; 2008 WL 5113417
(2008) Margaret VONHAGN, Plaintiff, v. CORNING INCORPORATED, the Corning Incorporated Benefits Committee, Synchrony Integrated Disability Services, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Inc., also known as Metlife, Defendants. No. 06-CV-6469L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 25, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-02-16 · Published · cited 23× · 399 F.3d 436
POOLER, Circuit Judge. INTRODUCTION Underlying this appeal are massive asbestos liability claims against appellee Corning, Incorporated (“Corning”),- and a company in which Corning owns 50% of the stock, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“PCC”). However, the immediate issues are whether a state or federal forum will determine certain insurers’ claims that their policies do not cover asbestos claims against
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 23 F. App'x 90
SUMMARY ORDER This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, and was argued by counsel. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Skretny’s Decision and Order dated October 15, 1999. Al
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 169 F. Supp. 2d 440; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22775; 2001 WL 1352313
169 F.Supp.2d 440 (2001) SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.; and Sumitomo Electric Lightwave Corp; Plaintiffs, v. CORNING, INCORPORATED, Defendant. No. 1:00CV00863. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. September 11, 2001. *441 Michael E. Ray, Christopher G. Daniel, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Sale
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1997-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 25 Va. App. 332; 488 S.E.2d 642; 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 523
FITZPATRICK, Judge. Coming, Inc. and Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co. (collectively referred to as employer) appeal the decision of the commission awarding Donald R. Testerman (claimant) temporary total disability benefits for the period commencing August 22, 1995 and continuing through October 17, 1995. Employer contends that the comm
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 371 F. Supp. 3d 914
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Second Amended Motion and Memorandum for Entry of Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. # 81) and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Dkt. # 82). Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction maintains that Defendant is impermissibly using Plaintiff's
District Court, W.D. New York · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 17× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 342
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge This action was brought by four property owners in Corning, New York ("Corning, NY"), against Corning Incorporated ("Corning"), asserting claims under the Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et
District Court, W.D. New York · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 10× · 371 F. Supp. 3d 87
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge This action was brought by four property owners in Corning, New York ("Corning, NY"), against Corning Incorporated ("Corning"), asserting claims under the Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et
In re: Corning Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-06-07 · Published · cited 1× · 786 S.E.2d 816; 247 N.C. App. 680; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 618
ELMORE, Judge. *681 Cabarrus County appeals from the Final Decision of the North Carolina Property Tax Commission lowering the assessed property values for Tax Years 2012 and 2013 to the values urged by the taxpayer, Corning Inc. The County argues that the Commission's Final Decision is not
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 163 A.3d 708
Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. N15M-05-009 AFFIRMED.
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 163 A.3d 708; 2017 Del. LEXIS 207
Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. N15M-05-009 AFFIRMED.
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016-03-22 · Published · cited 4× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 869; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37731; 2016 WL 1122022
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding (1) Breach of Contract and (2) Incorrect Inventorship Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,745,209 (the “’209 Patent”) brought by Plaintiffs John R. Wilson (“Wilson”) and Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corp. (“Wilson Wolf’) (toget
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 4× · 590 S.E.2d 479; 356 S.C. 592
356 S.C. 592 (2003) 590 S.E.2d 479 Janet B. MURPHY and David M. Murphy, Respondents, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and as successor to Unarco Industries, Inc., ACandS, Inc., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co., Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Fibreboard Corporation, Na
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004-02-13 · Published · cited 46× · 843 A.2d 410
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: ■ ¶ 1 Appellant, John Crane, Inc., appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict after a jury awarded Oscar Smalls $2,000,000 for injuries related to asbestos exposure and awarded his wife, Lizzie Smalls (collectively “Appellees”), $500,000 for loss of consortium. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the sole issue of damages. ¶2 In 1954, Mr. Smalls began emplo