Cases

688 F.Supp. 193 (1988) SIMMS INVESTMENT COMPANY, a North Carolina Corporation, Plaintiff, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY INC., A Delaware Corporation, and A.L. & E. Operating Company, an Oklahoma Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. C-87-643-WS. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division. June 9, 1988. *

535 S.W.2d 192 (1976) Delia Garcia SIMMS, Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST TEXAS METHODIST HOSPITAL et al., Appellees. No. 15387. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. March 3, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1976. *194 Hardberger, Branton & Herrera, Maverick & Tynan, San Antonio, for appellant. Wil

263 S.W.2d 435 (1953) MORTON et al. v. SIMMS et al. No. 43819. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. December 14, 1953. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1954. *436 Wm. Waye, Jr., St. Charles, for appellants Mabel Morton and Ben Morton. Redmon Morton, pro se. Floyd Morton, pro se.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

"I loan to my brother Joel Simms, during his natural life, four negroes, viz., etc.; also one tract of land, etc.; and at his death, etc., I give to my brother John Simms two negroes, etc.; also two hundred and fifty dollars in cash. "The balance of my property, consisting of stock, of horses, cattle, hogs and sheep, with my household and kitchen furniture, plantation utensils, with my crop of corn, fodder, wheat and cotton, I leave with my executors, out of which my just debts are to

726 A.2d 745 (1999) 125 Md. App. 454 OWENS CORNING v. Leroy A. BAUMAN, et al. No. 744, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 1, 1999. Opinion on Motion for Clarification April 7, 1999. *749 Thomas G. Hungar (Mark A. Perry, Larry L. Simms, Wesley L. Hsu, Gibson, D

725 A.2d 579 (1999) 125 Md. App. 313 OWENS-CORNING, et al. v. Vernon WALATKA, et al. No. 385, September Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 25, 1999. Reconsideration Denied April 5, 1999. *580 Thomas G. Hungar (Mark A. Perry, Larry L. Simms, Wesley L. Hsu, Gibson, Du

KING, Chief Judge: Shareholders of WorldCom Corporation (now known as MCI WorldCom) appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their consolidated amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-4, and from the district court’s denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion fo

972 S.W.2d 35 (1998) OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Roy MALONE et al., Respondents. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Barbara WASIAK, et al., Respondents. Nos. 96-0287, 96-0512. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 21, 1996. Decided June 5, 1998. Rehearing Overruled August 25, 1998.

16 Cal.4th 520 (1997) JAMES BUTTRAM, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S046375. Supreme Court of California. August 18, 1997. *523 COUNSEL Wright, Robinson, McCammon, Osthimer & Tatum, Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum, James C. Nielsen, Thomas H.

HOLLAND, Justice: The defendant-appellant, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation (“OCF”), has filed a Motion with this Court for an Emergency Stay of Proceedings in the Superior Court. Supr.CtR. 32(a).1 In its motion, OCF seeks a stay of execution on a Superior Court judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Patricia Carter (“Carter”), for money damages in the amount of $2,500,856. Carter has file

FRANSON, J. *160*683This appeal addresses the circumstances under which a safety consultant retained by a California employer owes a duty of care to the employer's workers. California recognizes the common law theory of negligent undertaking, which is desc

Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Robert Benedict's MOTION FOR *788SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 52). The motion was granted by ORDER (ECF No. 221) dated November 27, 2017. This Memorandum Opinion sets out the reasoning for having done so. I. B

578 So.2d 281 (1991) Henry Leon PACE, individually and as personal representative of the heirs and estate of Joseph Pace, deceased v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al. 89-391. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 15, 1991. Brent M. Rosenthal and Russell W. Budd of Baron & Budd, Dallas, Tex., and S.C. Middlebrooks of Gardner, Middlebrooks & Fleming, Mobile,

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | ¡Defendant, Tonya Victor, appeals her competency to proceed to trial and her conviction for out-of-state bail jumping from the 40th Judicial District Court, Division “B”. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction and sentence. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant and her husband, Errol Victor, Sr., were charged with second degree murder and were rel

JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiffs U.S. Water Services, Inc. and Roy Johnson sued defendants Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. for infringing U.S. Patents Nos. 8,415,137 and 8,609,399, two patents that disclose methods for using the enzyme phytase to reduce phytic acid deposits on equipment used in fuel ethanol production. (Consistent with its practice throughout this lawsuit, the court will refer to plaintif

Filed 7/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OSCAR PEREDIA et al., F074083 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 13CECG03137) v. HR MOBILE SERVICES, INC.,

7 Cal.Rptr.3d 536 (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 376 Kathleen HERNANDEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant and Respondent. Rochelle Ramos, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Department of Transportation, Defendant and Respondent. No. B157527. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. December 15, 2003.

Hon. Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation's ("Defendant" or "Sikorsky") summary judgment motion of Plaintiff Pellumb Ameti's ("Plaintiff" or "Ameti") employment termination case.1 Mr. Ameti brings claims of unlawful discrimination and hostile work environment based on race, national origin, and religion in violation of Title VII of th

98 P.3d 1092 (2004) 2004 OK 69 Charlene K. BRADSHAW, Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD, Glo Henley, Chairperson, Kenneth Monroe, Vice Chairman, Thomas E. Prince, Member and Tom Cole, Respondents. No. 100,836. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. August 13, 2004. ORDER ¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of