Cases

237 S.W.3d 473 (2006) Bradley Ray WILSON, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CA CR 05-1013. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. June 21, 2006. *475 Stanley D. Christopher, Malvern, AR, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by Nicana Corinne Sherman, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, AR, for appellee. OLLY NEAL, J

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered March 28, 2003, which, inter alia, denied the motion of second third-party defendant Gandhi Engineering, EC. to sever the second third-party action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying Gandhi’s motion for a severance since the actions involve common factual and legal issues and judicial economy would be se

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: Jermaine J. Wilson was charged with armed carjacking and related offenses. He contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by refusing to enforce his right to an “acquittal first” instruction when the jury convicted him of the lesser-included offense of (unarmed) carjacking *1193without first acquitting him of the greater offe

RANDALL, Circuit Judge: This direct appeal from the judgment of a bankruptcy court in a joint proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code raises two issues: first, the debtors challenge the bankruptcy court’s refusal to allow one spouse to claim exemptions under federal law when the other spouse claims exemptions under Texas law; second, the trustee challenges the bankruptcy court’s

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court are motions to dismiss Plaintiff Richard Noll’s (“Plaintiff’) alleged class action complaint (“Complaint”) brought by Defendants eBay, Inc.; eBay Europe S.A.R.L.; and eBay International AG (“Defendants”). See Docket Item Nos. 24, 4

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION; GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Richard Noll (“Noll”) and Rhythm Motor Sports, LLC (“Rhythm”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this is a putative class action against Defendant eBay, Inc., (“Defendant”) regarding the recurring fees for the Good ’Til Cancelled (“GTC”) listings

323 S.W.3d 37 (2010) In re: The ESTATE OF Harry Henderson QUALLS, Deceased. No. ED 93619. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. August 31, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 7, 2010. Application for Transfer Denied November 16, 2010. Lawrence J. Altman, Corinne N. Darvish, St. Lo

District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 13-CF-1170 JUN 30 2016 DARIC M. WILSON, Appellant, v. CF2-2522-12 UNITED STATES, Appellee. On Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columb

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: In this bankruptcy proceeding a creditor, Kentile Floors, Inc. (Kentile), objected on several grounds to the general discharge of the bankrupts, Clifford L. Winham and Corinne Winham, who operated Winham’s Floor Coverings, a sole proprietorship. After a hearing, the referee held for Kentile on all grounds as

FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge. These three consolidated appeals involve a single lawsuit brought to collect fire insurance upon a feed mill known as the Pulaski Mill & Elevator Company. The mill was damaged by fire upon July *674 14, 1956. Joe W.

113 Cal.App.2d 14 (1952) CORINNE WILSON et al., Respondents, v. JEFFERSON DAVIS RHOADES et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 4229. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Sept. 3, 1952. W. P. Smith, William H. Daubney and Luce, Forward, Kunzel & Scripps for Appellants. Thomas Whelan and William F. Reed for Respondents. MUSSELL, J. This acti

I concur in the judgment of reversal. I also concur in Part I, which holds that the trial court fulfilled the requirements of Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., and made the summary judgment in favor of Dr. Teng final. I also concur in Part III, which holds that the evidence creates genuine issues of material fact as to whether Dr. Teng's actions relating to Starsha created a physician-patient relationship between Dr. Teng and Starsha in the emergency room and as to whether Dr. Teng breached t

766 F.Supp.2d 991 (2011) Margaret KREEGER, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA; BP WELFARE Plan Trust-III's Insurance Plan, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-08262 GAF (OPx). United States District Court, C.D. California. February 28, 2011. *993 Corinne Chandler, Niamh E. Doherty, Kantor & Kantor LLP, Northridge, C

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EDWARD WILSON, Appellant, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC; BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION; BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION; PFIZER, INC.; SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC; SANOFI US SERVICES, INC.; AND PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.,

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

48 S.W.3d 36 (2001) CITY OF HAZELWOOD, Respondent, v. Robert H. PETERSON, et al., Appellants. and Chris Braudis, et al., Respondents, v. Florissant Valley Fire Protection District, et al., Appellants. No. SC 82716. Supreme Court of Missouri, En banc. May 29, 2001. Rehearing Denied July 24, 2001. *37 J

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

205 Ga. App. 201 (1992) 421 S.E.2d 730 VANCE v. THE STATE. A92A1035. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided July 2, 1992. Reconsideration Denied July 27, 1992. Corinne M. Mull-Milsteen, for appellant. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Elisabeth MacNamara, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

201 Ga. App. 162 (1991) 410 S.E.2d 362 SCOTT v. THE STATE. A91A1071. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 10, 1991. Corinne M. Mull, for appellant. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Elisabeth G. MacNamara, Gregory J. Lohmeier, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. POPE, Judge.<