⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Corcoran v. White”

White v. Corcoranpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 79; 205 L. Ed. 2d 63
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
District Court, D. Maryland · 2017-08-03 · Published · cited 2× · 261 F. Supp. 3d 579
MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Thomas Corcoran sues Jefferson B. Sessions, Attorney General of the United States;1 Thomas E. Brandon, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; William M. Pallozzi, Secretary of the Maryland State Police; and Brian Frosh, Attorney General for the State of Maryland.
White v. Uribepublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 893 F. Supp. 2d 1043; 2012 WL 3954242; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128461
*1045ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time perm
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0909V UNPUBLISHED BRENDA WHITE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: November 8, 2021 v. Pre-Assignment Review; A
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-04-20 · Published · cited 2× · 164 N.Y.S.3d 860; 204 A.D.3d 910; 2022 NY Slip Op 02542
Matter of Corcoran v Liebowitz (2022 NY Slip Op 02542) Matter of Corcoran v Liebowitz 2022 NY Slip Op 02542 Decided on April 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
State v. Corcoranpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-08-04 · Published · cited 2× · 2017 Ohio 7084
[Cite as State v. Corcoran, 2017-Ohio-7084.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-160627 TRIAL NO. B-1501302-A Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-12-30 · Published · cited 5× · 189 A.D.3d 1579; 138 N.Y.S.3d 158; 2020 NY Slip Op 08058
Matter of Corcoran v Liebowitz (2020 NY Slip Op 08058) Matter of Corcoran v Liebowitz 2020 NY Slip Op 08058 Decided on December 30, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu
Corcoran v. Whitepublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1886-05-15 · Published · cited 2× · 117 Ill. 118; 7 N.E. 525
Mr. Justice Sheldon delivered the opinion of the Court: This was a bill in equity, filed by Theresa B. Corcoran, against Nathan S. White and others, to compel the specific performance of an alleged agreement to sell to the complainant sub-lot 2 of lot 1, in' block 3, in the original town of Chicago: On final hearing upon bill, answers, replications, and proofs adduced, the b
Corcoran v. Whitepublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 146 Mass. 329; 1888 Mass. LEXIS 254; 15 N.E. 636
Knowlton, J. At the trial the plaintiffs rested their claim to the replevied horses solely upon their title and right of possession as assignees in insolvency of George W. Davis. There was evidence tending to show that one Bridges was a part owner of the horses, but the jury were instructed in effect that it was immaterial whether Bridges was or was not a joint owner with the plaintiffs, and that if the plaintiffs showed that the
White v. Georgepublic domain
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County · 2004-04-23 · Published · cited 7× · 66 Pa. D. & C.4th 129; 2004 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 244
DOBSON, J., The matters before the court for disposition are defendant’s preliminary objections and supplemental preliminary objections to plaintiff’s amended complaint in equity. For the following reasons, the objections will be granted in part and denied in part. Viewed in the requisite light, the facts may be summarized as follows. Associates in Child Guidance (ACG), a close corporation, was forme
White v. Georgepublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 570 Pa. 59; 807 A.2d 905
ORDER PER CURIAM. Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-09-10 · Published · cited 5× · 961 F. Supp. 2d 333; 2013 WL 4832601; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128924
*335MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON SHOW CAUSE RESPONSE AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD G. STEARNS, District Judge. The choice of birthing techniques is not the most obvious subject for a war of polemics. But the wisdom of midwifery-triggered a ferocious battle of the blogs culminating in this lawsuit pitting Amy Tuteur, a resident of Massachusetts,
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00982-CV G. CHRISTIAN CORCORAN AND PEGGY CORCORAN, Appellants V. ATASCOCITA COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris County, Texas
Corcoran v. Busspublic domain
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007-04-09 · Published · cited 7× · 483 F. Supp. 2d 709; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26768; 2007 WL 1068102
483 F.Supp.2d 709 (2007) Joseph Edward CORCORAN, Petitioner, v. Ed BUSS, Respondent. No. 3:05-CV-389 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. April 9, 2007. *710 *711 Alan M. Freedman PHV, Midwest Center for Justice Ltd., Evanston, IL, Laurence E. Komp PHV, Attorney
Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988-02-01 · Published · cited 61× · 746 S.W.2d 452; 1988 Tenn. LEXIS 9
ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR PER CURIAM. Appellant, Christopher J. Corcoran, has filed a petition to rehear in the above case. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the petition to rehear is not well taken and the same is denied at the cost of Appellant.
People v. Corcoranpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2006-09-22 · Published · cited 26× · 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 851; 143 Cal. App. 4th 272; 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12953; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9055; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1501
48 Cal.Rptr.3d 851 (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 272 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tyler CORCORAN, Defendant and Appellant. No. B180779. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Four. September 22, 2006. *852 Leonard J. Klaif, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-04-14 · Published · cited 8× · 783 F.3d 676; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6063; 2015 WL 1726793
SYKES, Circuit Judge. In 1997 Joseph Corcoran shot and killed four men at his home in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A jury convicted him .of four counts of murder and recommended the death penalty. The trial judge agreed and imposed a death sentence in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. After his appeals in state court had rim their course, Corcoran sought federal habeas relief on mu
White v. Gomezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 54 F.3d 786; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22374; 1995 WL 309935
54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vancile A. WHITE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,v.James H. GOMEZ, Director, California Department ofCorrections; George Smith, Warden, CaliforniaState Prison at Corc
State v. Whitepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-05-12 · Published · cited 8× · 2021 Ohio 1644
[Cite as State v. White, 2021-Ohio-1644.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-190589 TRIAL NO. B-1806227 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs. : HAROLD WHITE,
Wiggins v. Corcoranpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and remanded by Supreme Court opinion filed 6/26/03. Petition for cert granted by Supreme Court order filed 11/18/02. Filed: June 4, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-23 (CA-99-2420-JFM) Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner - Appellee, versus Thomas R