Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HON. PAULINE NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-01334 (CRC) HON. KIMBERLY A. MOORE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2021, the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Kimberly A. Moore, received reports fro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HON. PAULINE NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-01334 (CRC) HON. KIMBERLY A. MOORE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Veteran Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman has sued Federal Circuit Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore, alon

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

On October 3, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced for Count I: Criminal Endangerment, a felony, in violation of Section 45-5-207, MCA, to the Department of Corrections for Ten (10) years with Ten (10) years suspended. On October 3,2013, the DOC is to administer a urinalysis test on Defendant, and if Defendant tests positive for opiates, he is to be taken into custody. Defendant shall receive credit for time served of 292 days; and other terms and conditions

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 93); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 96); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND DEFENDANTS SGT. CURTIS LA-RAVTE, OFFICER STACY FRISK, OFFICER THOMAS CONNOR, AND SGT. JAY VITALI (DOC. # 84); DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS SGT. CURTIS LARAVIE, OFFICER STACY FRIS

This matter is before the Court on the State's appeal from the trial court order dismissing one of two criminal charges pending against defendant Sheila Newman. We reverse the trial court's dismissal of the charge of resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer. I. Background On 6 March 2004, defendant was charged with second degree trespass ("trespass"), resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer1</

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion; in which Judge MOTZ and Judge TRAXLER joined. AGEE, Circuit Judge: The State of North Carolina requires persons convicted of certain reportable sex offenses to register as “sex offenders,” See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.6(4); id.' § 14-208.7(a). For persons convicted of a subset of those reportable sex offenses, North Carolina restricts their move

Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, and with whom The Chief Justice joins as to all but Part IV, dissenting. “If a plea bargain has been offered, a defendant has the right to effective assistance of counsel in considering whether to accept it. If that right is denied, prejudice can be shown if loss of the plea opportunity led to a trial resulting in a conviction on more serious charges o

OSCN Found Document:STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. NEWMAN STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. NEWMAN2026 OK 31Case Number: SCBD-7903Decided: 05/05/2026THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2026 OK 31, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO

*528Justice NEWMAN, concurring. I agree with the Majority that the Orders of the Superior Court and the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas must be vacated, but write separately to emphasize my belief that pursuing the personal financial information of an expert witness is, with few exceptions, an abuse of the discovery process. The Pennsylvania Rule

Damoorgian, J. In these consolidated appeals, Marybeth Newman (“Former Wife”) and Jon Newman (“Former Husband”) each challenge aspects of the final judgment dissolving *643the parties’ seventeen-year marriage (case no. 14-4842) and Former Husband challenges the court’s entry of separate money judgments for sums awarded in the final judgment of dissolution (cases no. 1

16 So.3d 156 (2009) Jeffrey W. COOPER, Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a foreign corporation, and Central Parking System of Florida, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees. No. 4D08-1583. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 1, 2009. Rehearing Denied September 22, 2009. *157 Nico

458 S.E.2d 701 (1995) 217 Ga. App. 674 COLLIPP et al. v. NEWMAN et al. No. A95A0443. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 28, 1995. Gilbert, Harrell, Gilbert, Sumerford & Martin, Wallace E. Harrell, III, Lisa S. Godbey, Fendig, McLemore, Taylor & Whitworth, Phillip R. Taylor, Brunswick, for appellants. Ashman, Lasky & Cooper,

[Cite as State v. Newman, 2020-Ohio-5087.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109182 v. : DAZELLE NEWMAN, :

By Judge William T. Newman, Jr. This matter comes before the Court on defendant Collection Specialists’ Demurrer, argued by defendant on June 8,2001. Counsel for plaintiff was not present for the motion, and for this reason the Court took the matter under advisement in order to fully review the pleadings. The Court has carefully considered defendant’s Memorandum in Support of the Demurrer and Plaintiffs Opposition. After revi

ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs bring this action under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and Ohio statutory and common law against defendant Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc. (Western & Southern). (Doc. 3). This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the compl

Schimoler v Newman (2019 NY Slip Op 06427) Schimoler v Newman 2019 NY Slip Op 06427 Decided on August 28, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 24, 2025 Decided August 22, 2025 No. 24-5173 PAULINE NEWMAN, HONORABLE; CIRCUIT JUDGE, APPELLANT v. KIMBERLY A. MOORE, HONORABLE; IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS CHIEF JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, CHAIR OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND CHAIR OF

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Brown v. State,

Bartlett, J. The facts stated in Cooper v. Newman show a valid attachment of the oxen by the plaintiff, Huntingdon v. Blaisdell, 2 N. H. 317; and it is not material here whether the plaintiff retaineda ctual possession of them throughBliss, for if he allowed the oxen to remain in the possession of Howard, it was upon the understanding of both that the attachment was still to subsist, and theref