Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cooper v. Ann Richards Movie LLC”
Jeffrey R. Cooper v. Phillip Glasserpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 31, 2013 Session JEFFREY R. COOPER v. PHILLIP GLASSER ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Middle Section Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 11C3952 Joseph P. Binkley Jr., Judge No. M2012-00344-SC-R11-CV - Filed November 26, 2013 The plaintiff filed a
Jeffrey R. Cooper v. Phillip Glasserpublic domain
OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants in California state court, alleging a number of business-related torts. After on
Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCpublic domain
RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D
ACCEPTED 01-15-00838-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/2/2015 10:38:19 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Applehead Pictures LLC v. Perelmanpublic domain
*184OPINION OF THE COURT Nardelli, J. The primary issue presented is whether two separately executed agreements — a marital separation agreement and a business operating agreement — can be deemed to be one integrated contract so that an alleged breach of the separation agreement can constitute a breach of the operating agreement that would justify a r
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-868C (Filed Under Seal: July 31, 2017) (Reissued for Publication: October 2, 2017)* ************************************* TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE * SOLUTIONS, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v.
OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge In this postaward bid protest, plaintiff Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC (“Torres”) contends that the United States Department of State (“State Department”) improperly awarded a contract for local guard services at a United States embassy to defendant-intervenor G4S Joint Venture (“G4S”). Specifically, Torres alleges several irregularities with the State Department’s
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing. Nokia requests rehearing, and again raises the question of whether InterDigital has the statutory right to bring this exclusion action, for InterDigital does not manufacture the patented invention in the United States, and no domestic industry produces the items for which exclusion is sought. The license that InterDigital seeks to impose
Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC v. Chanospublic domain
217 P.3d 546 (2009) FLAMINGO PARADISE GAMING, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company d/b/a Terrible's Hotel and Casino; Higco, Inc., A Nevada Corporation d/b/a Three Angry Wives Pub; Market Gaming, Inc., A Nevada Corporation; Cardivan Company, A Nevada Corporation; E-T-T, Inc., A Nevada Corporation; and Nevada Tavern Owners Association, Appellants, v. George CHANOS, Attorney General of the State of Nevada; David Roger, Clark County District Atto
McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 786 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 787 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.public domain
164 P.3d 696 (2007) HAWAII VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. OTAKA, INC.; Takao Building Co., Ltd., formerly known as Takao Building Development Co., Ltd.; K.K. Kaini Seven, Yukio Takahashi; Hawaiian Waikiki Beach, Inc.; Alaka`i Mechanical Corporation; Hewlett-Packard Company; Hawaii Energy Management Co., LLC., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Business Management Group, Inc.; Beach Snack Express, Inc.; John Does
Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corp.public domain
51 F.Supp.2d 840 (1999) WRENCH LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company; Joseph Shields; and Thomas Rinks, Plaintiffs, v. TACO BELL CORP., a foreign corporation, Defendant. No. 1:98-CV-45. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 10, 1999. *841 Douglas A. Dozeman, Valerie Ann Pierre Simmons, Warner, N
INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC
Perez v. Oak Grove Cinemas, Inc.public domain
HERNANDEZ, District Judge: In this wage action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA), Plaintiff Thomas Perez, the United States Secretary of Labor, brings three claims against Defendants Oak Grove Cinemas, Inc., Barrington Management LLC, Barrington Venture LLC, and David Emami. Plaintiff first brings a claim against all Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages to thirty-five individuals
Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A. Inc.public domain
772 F.Supp.2d 1155 (2009) FLEISCHER STUDIOS, INC., Plaintiff(s), v. A.V.E.L.A. INC.; Art-Nostalgia.Com, Inc.; X One X Movie Archive, Inc.; Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co.; Leo Valencia, Defendant(s). Case No. 2:06-cv-06229-FMC-MANx. United States District Court, C.D. California. June 29, 2009. *1156 Borchien Lai, Mark Steven Lee, Ma
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Connpublic domain
*912MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Crosscountry Mortgage, Inc. (“CCMI”)1 has moved to dismiss the conspiracy to breach fiduciary duties claim brought by Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (“GRI”).2 The basis for CCMI’s motion is lack of personal jurisdiction. In
Seavitt v. N-Able, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN SEAVITT, on behalf of himself ) and all other similarly-situated ) stockholders of N-ABLE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0326-JTL ) N-ABLE, INC., ) )
The Weinstein Co Holdings v.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 20-1750 and 20-1751 In re: WEINSTEIN COMPANY HOLDINGS LLC, et al., Debtors SPYGLASS MEDIA GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Lantern Entertainment LLC v. BRUCE COHEN PRODUCTIONS; BRUCE COHEN, Appellants in 20-1751 BRADLEY COOPER; 22ND & INDIANA, INC.; BRUCE COHEN; BRUCE C