Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cooke v. Craig”
John Schickel v. Craig Dilgerpublic domain
COOK, Circuit Judge. One sitting state senator and one prospective candidate for elected office in Kentucky challenged several state campaign finance and ethics laws, claiming violations of their First Amendment rights to free speech and association and Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. Kentucky argues that these measures, enacted to prevent corruption and protect its cit
Cooke v. CITY OF ALICEpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 320 OPINION This appeal involves statutory interpretation of sections 143.045 and 143.046 of the Texas Civil Service Act which provide for the accrual of annual vacation and sick leave for police officers and fire fighters. TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 143.045, 143.046 (West 20
Richard Jahn v. Philip Craig Burkepublic domain
OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Philip C. and Nekolia S. Burke encountered financial distress during the “Great Recession” that began in 2008. Unable to pay their debts, they filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy seven years later. Richard P. Jahn Jr., as bankruptcy trustee of the Burkes’ estate, sought to evict the Burkes from their residence in order t
v. Cookepublic domain
dictating the specifics of how the legislature might comply with the reading requirement, it is the judiciary’s prerogative and responsibility to declare that the legislature did not comply with that requirement in this case. The supreme court therefore agrees with the district court’s determination that the unintelligible sounds produced by the computers on the Senate floor on March 11, 2019, did not fulfill the reading requirement. However, unlike the district court, the supreme c
Craig v. Craigpublic domain
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge Ricky Lee Craig, father of decedent Zerottie Lemans Craig, appeals the Garland County Circuit Court's July 21, 2017 order wherein the court admitted the decedent's October 18, 2003 last will and testament ("LWT") to probate and appointed appellant and Thomasena McNutt, the decedent's sister, as coexecutors of the estate. The court also found that the decedent's antenuptial agreement ("AA") removed his wife f
State v. Craigpublic domain
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Conyers (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 246, 719 N.E.2d 535. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Craig v. Sepulvadopublic domain
709 So.2d 229 (1998) Michael CRAIG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald SEPULVADO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-1076. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 18, 1998. Writ Denied May 1, 1998. *230 Charles Wilson Seaman, Natchitoches, for Michael L. Craig, et al. Mark Alan Watson
Craig v. Gilchristpublic domain
[Cite as Craig v. Gilchrist, 2022-Ohio-4477.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Simone Craig, : No. 22AP-52 Plaintiff-Appellee, : (Case No. 17JU-4732)
Craig v. Gilchristpublic domain
[Cite as Craig v. Gilchrist, 2021-Ohio-2199.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Simone Craig, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-804 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17JU-4732) Terrence Gilchrist,
State v. Cookepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Cooke, 2016-Ohio-3445.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon
Michael A. Newell v. Craig Hankspublic domain
FLAUM, Chief Judge. In 1990 Michael Newell was convicted of dealing cocaine, in violation of ind. Code § 35-48-4-1, and sentenced to 30 years in prison. Newell timely filed a petition in the federal district court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, see Newell v. Hanks, 283 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2002), but the district court denied the petition f
Michael A. Newell v. Craig Hankspublic domain
FLAUM, Chief Judge. On April 24, 1997, Michael Newell filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely, or alternatively for lack of merit, and Newell appeals. We vacate the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings. I. Background In 1990 Newell wa
Cooke v. Statepublic domain
STRINE, Chief Justice: I. INTRODUCTION James E. Cooke was convicted of, among other things, raping and murdering Lindsey Bonistall, a 20-year-old University of Delaware student. Cooke now seeks to have the judgment of convictions and the death sentence that were entered against him in the Superior Court vacated and to receive a new trial, or at least a ne
Castle & Cooke v. Alcantarpublic domain
RICHARDSON, P. J. Petitioner seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that petitioner is responsible for claimant’s back condition from November, 1986, until October 23,1987.1 It argues that the Board erred by holdingthat it had waived its right to assert a “causation defense” by contesting responsibility only. We reverse. Claimant injured his back in 1982, w
State ex rel. Craig v. Sarguspublic domain
In Procedendo. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant the writ.
State v. Craigpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,070 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. JOSHUA XAVIER CRAIG, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. As used in K.S.A. 22-3603, the term "suppressing eviden
State ex rel. Lucaj v. Craigpublic domain
In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Echols v. Craigpublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Derrick Echols, an Illinois inmate, claims in this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that prison dentist Dr. Frederick Craig (an employee of Wexford Health Sources) violated the Eighth Amendment by providing dental care with deliberate indifference to Echols’ serious health needs. While Dr. Craig was extracting a wisdom tooth, a drill bit broke. Dr. Craig sutured Echols’ gum with gauze and at least one half-
Craig Ross v. Ronald Davispublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRAIG ANTHONY ROSS, No. 17-99000 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cv-02720- SVW RONALD DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District
Cooke v. Unknownpublic domain
[Cite as Cooke v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-5225.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263