Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cook v. WM Limited Partnership-1998”
ACCEPTED 07-15-00083-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/9/2015 5:05:30 PM
Fox v. Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-489 No. COA20-438 Filed 21 September 2021 Guilford County, No. 12 CVS 4940 WILLIAM THOMAS FOX and SCOTT EVERETT SANDERS, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO; MITCHELL JOHNSON, individually and in his officially capacities; TIMOTHY R. BELLAMY, individually and in his off
Fox v. Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-489 No. COA20-438 Filed 21 September 2021 Guilford County, No. 12 CVS 4940 WILLIAM THOMAS FOX and SCOTT EVERETT SANDERS, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO; MITCHELL JOHNSON, individually and in his officially capacities; TIMOTHY R. BELLAMY, individually and in his off
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. New Wen, Inc. v. Marchbanks, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-63.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215
Rel: September 27, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIA
Clift v. RDP Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge The Clift family filed this action against RDP Company and Lafarge West, Inc., alleging various claims arising out of, or connected to, a mineral rights lease dating back to 1977. With discovery at an end, the Clifts, RDP Company, and Lafarge West filed competing motions for summary judgment. (To the extent RDP Company prevails, Martin Marietta Materials,
Herrera v. Singhpublic domain
103 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2000) Santiago HERRERA, Armando Andres, Luciano Andres, Jesus Andres Torres, Bertoldo Garcia, Roberto Gonzalez, Jose R. Nicolas, Jose de Jesus Ortiz, Pedro Ybarra and Joseph Romero, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Jarnail SINGH d/b/a Ram Farms, a partnership, Defendant. No. CS-98-0380-WFN. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. June 13, 2000. <
Florman v. MEBCO Ltd. Partnershippublic domain
207 S.W.3d 593 (2006) William FLORMAN; Frank Boyce Moodie, III, Kathleen Moodie; Berrian Minerals, Inc.; and Larry Glass, Appellants, v. MEBCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A Kentucky Limited Partnership; Cumberland River Resources, LLC; Jim Smith Contracting, LLC; Lawrence L. Pedley; John C. Pedley; David Pedley; H. Gregory Maddux; Phillip Maddux; Hazel Maddux; Martha Lee Wright; and T.L. Maddux, Jr., Appellees. MEBCO Limited Partnership, Appellant,<
Neilson v. Straight-Out Promotions, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ALLAN L. GROPPER, Bankruptcy Judge. This is an action for damages in connection with a professional heavyweight boxing match (the “Fight”) held on July 30, 2004, in Louisville, Kentucky between Mike Tyson (“Tyson”), the former world heavyweight champion, and Danny Williams (“Williams”). A. The Parties (i) Todd Neilson (the
Lease Resolution Corp. v. Larneypublic domain
719 N.E.2d 165 (1999) 308 Ill. App.3d 80 241 Ill.Dec. 304 LEASE RESOLUTION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, as General partner, and Datronic Equipment Income Fund XVII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dennis LARNEY and Midland Capital Corporation, an Illinois corporation, Defendants-Appellees (Edmund Lopinski, Jr., Defendant). No. 1-98-2569.<
Yuanzong Fu v. Rhodespublic domain
McHUGH, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): {22 I concur with part I of the majority's decision, but I respectfully dissent from part II regarding whether a party may challenge the sufficiency of the complaint to support a default judgment for the first time on appeal. Accordingly, I would consider whether Fu's Complaint states a claim upon which relief can be grante
Ariel Investments, LLC v. Ariel Capital Advisors LLCpublic domain
' FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Ariel Investments, LLC sued Ariel Capital Advisors LLC, alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, and cy-bersquatting in violation of the Lanham Act and unfair trade practices in violation of the Illinois Deceptive. Trade Practices Act and Illinois common law. Ariel Capital raised several affirmative defenses and ass
Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLCpublic domain
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. On the heels of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Channel 2 news in Chicago ran a story about lax regulation of security guards in Illinois. Carl E. Thomas, a security officer for Guardsmark, LLC (then Guardsmark, Inc., hereinafter “Guardsmark”), appeared in that story and stated that once, while working as a security guard at an oil refinery, h
Abraham v. WPX Energy Production, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend and to Reconsider Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doe. 252], filed September 15, 2016 (Doc. 255)(“Motion to Amend”); and (ii) the Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Class Certification, filed September 15, 2016 (Doc. 256)(“Second Motion for Class Certifi
Steam TV Networks, Inc. v. SeeCubic, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STREAM TV NETWORKS, INC., § § No. 360, 2021 Plaintiff Below, Appellant, § § Court Below: Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware § SEECUBIC, INC., § C.A. No. 2020-0766 § Defendant
Filed 12/6/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- EAST SACRAMENTO PARTNERSHIPS FOR A C079614 LIVABLE CITY, (Super.
Sandra Slater v. United States Steel Corporationpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The equitable doctrine of judicial estop-pel, also known as the doctrine of preclusion of inconsistent positions, “precludes a party from asserting a ... position that contradicts or is inconsistent with a prior position taken by the same party.” 18 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 131.13[6][a] (3d ed.2015). The doctrine differs from the doctrines of issue and claim preclusion in that the policy
Cox v. MA Primary and Urgent Care Clinicpublic domain
313 S.W.3d 240 (2010) Melissa Michelle COX v. M.A. PRIMARY AND URGENT CARE CLINIC et al. No. M2007-01840-SC-R11-CV Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. April 6, 2010 Session Heard at Jackson. June 21, 2010. *243 C.J. Gideon, Jr., and Heather Piper-Coke (on appeal), Nashville, Tennessee, and John R. Rucker, J
Thomas, Carl E. v. Guardsmark Incpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-3865 CARL E. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GUARDSMARK, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Magnetek v. Kirkland and Ellis, LLPpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Magnetek, Inc. v. Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, 2011 IL App (1st) 101067 Appellate Court MAGNETEK, INC., a Delware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption KIRKLAND AND ELLIS, LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. First District, Second Division