Cases

376 B.R. 156 (2007) In re CONTRACTOR TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Debtor. Hirschfeld Steel Co., Inc., Appellant. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-37623-H1-7, Adversary No. 06-3528, Civil Action No. H-07-2281. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 25, 2007. *157 Contractor Technology, Houston, TX, pro se. Thomas Bake

345 B.R. 800 (2006) In re CONTRACTOR TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Debtor. Ronald J. Sommers, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Katy Steel Co., Inc., Defendant. Ronald J. Sommers, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Bell Bottom Foundation Company, Defendant. Ronald J. Sommers, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. FleetCor Technologies Operating Co., L.L.C., Defendant. Ronald J. Sommers, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Sunbelt

AMENDED ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge. Contractor Technology, Ltd. was a construction company that served as general contractor on various public works projects in Texas. In performing its work, Contractor Technology routinely engaged in transactions with subcontractors and materialmen to perform certain services or provide goods. The Defendants in thes

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Century Asphalt Materials, LLC, sold construction materials to Contractor Technology, Ltd., a general contractor for the State of Texas. Contractor Technology paid Century but before the checks cleared, the contractor filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court held that Contractor Technology’s payments to Century were unauthorized post-p

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2003 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2003. In The Fourteenth Court of A

ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BETH BLOOM, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion for Default Final Judgment filed by AAdyn Technology, LLC (“AAdyn”), Frank Gallagher, Marc Kaye and Walter Lefler (together, the “AAdyn Parties”), ECF No, [23] (the “Motion for Default Judgment”) and the Response, ECF No. [38], by Professional LED Lighting, Lt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) HESAI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-1381 (PLF) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al.,

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Dynamic Systems Technology, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63037 ) Under Contract No. W15QKN-19-D-0046 ) Task Order No. W15QKN-20-F-0713 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: James M. White, Esq. Marshall & W

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-2970 (PLF)

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS  MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL, LTD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.; MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS INC.; CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; No. 06-15636 SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; D.C. Nos. MOSEL-VITELIC, INC.; MOSEL- VITELIC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRILOGY FEDERAL, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-cv-2772 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM O

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-2035 (Filed Under Seal: May 29, 2025) (Reissued: June 18, 2025) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** RED RIVER SCIENCE & * TECHNOLOGY, LLC, * * Plaintiff, *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-2035C (Filed: January 8, 2025) FOR PUBLICATION ************************************* RED RIVER SCIENCE & * TECHNOLOGY, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 22-1380C, 22-1425C, 22-1436C, 22-1460C, 22-1462C, 22-1477C, 22-1492C, 22-1519C, 22-1549C, and 23-441C Filed: May 3, 2023 Re-issued: June 2, 20231 ________________________________________ ) ALLICENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al., )

655 F.3d 1278 (2011) AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. No. 2010-1458. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 22, 2011. *1281 Daniel W. McDonald, Merchant & Gould, of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With h

REVERSED and REMANDED and Opinion Filed May 11, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00398-CV SAGE IT, INC., Appellant V. SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, T

Sanders, Janet L., J. This is a contract dispute arising from a state- and federally-funded project to design and construct a fiber optic network in western Massachusetts. Plaintiff G4S Technology, LLC (G4S), the design-builder on the project, claims that the defendant Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation (MTPC) wrongfully denied a $10.1 Million “Request for Adjustment” claim, and that MTPC improperly withheld an additional

377 F.Supp.2d 166 (2005) BOWHEAD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC., Plaintiff, v. CATAPULT TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-1668 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 18, 2005. *167 Andrew Michael Friedman, Michael D. White, Patton Boggs, LLP, Washington, DC, Counsel for plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge Dome Technology, LLC (“Dome Technology”) filed this diversity action against Golden Sands General Contractors, Inc. (“Golden Sands”) and American Business Continuity Domes, Inc. (“ABC Domes”), asserting claims for breach of contract. The case is presently before the court on the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. For the following r

KAFKER, J. **722 At issue is a construction contract dispute between G4S Technology LLC (G4S) and Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation (MTPC) arising out of a State- and federally funded project to design and build a fiber optic network in western and north central Massachusetts. On s