Cases

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS ABROAD JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Cause having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Lourdes Leon, Alexander Paz, Seth Burack, and Nuria Reina’s Motion for Entry of an Order Directing Service of Process Abroad [DE #23] (“Motion”), requesting entry of an Order (1) directing the Clerk of the Southern District of Florida to r

246 Wis.2d 132 (2001) 2001 WI 112 629 N.W.2d 301 Todd NOMMENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Saint Mary's Medical Center, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants-Respondents. No. 99-3018. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument April 30, 2001. Decided July 12,

NETTESHEIM, J. ¶ 1. This is a medical malpractice case commenced by Todd Nommensen against Saint Mary's Medical Center, Inc. and its insurer, American Continental Insurance Company (St. Mary's). A jury determined that St. Mary's was negligent but that such negligence was not causal. *132Nommensen appeals from the ensuing judgment dismissing his complaint. He argues that t

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This

April 01, 2011 Mr. Thomas R. Phillips Baker Botts L.L.P. 98 San Jacinto Center, Suite 1500 Austin, TX 78701 Ms. Deborah G. Hankinson Hankinson Levinger LLP 750 N. St. Paul St., Suite 1800 Dallas, TX 75201 Ms. Melissa J. Armstrong Baker Botts L.L.P. 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75201 RE: Case Number: 08-0244 Court of Appeals Number: 05-04-01358-CV Trial Court Number: 03-00675 Style: BASIC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., AMERICAN REALT

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL L. HOVLAND, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Star Insurance Company. See Docket Nos. 177 and 219. Also before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Continental Resources, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company. See Docket Nos. 213 and 215

OPINION VOSS, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 This appeal involves a dispute between two insurance companies, each of which provided both primary coverage and umbrella coverage that was potentially applicable to the same motor vehicle accident in which a passenger was injured. Pursuant to Ariz. *120Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) section 20-1123.01(B)

ORDER BILBY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Until April 13, 1989, American Continental Corporation (“ACC”) engaged in financial services and real estate activities. On April 13, 1989, ACC filed a Petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On April 14, 1989 the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”) found that ACC’s principal subsidiary, Lincoln Savings and Loan Association (“Lin

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS DANIEL L. HOVLAND, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Continental Services, Inc., (“Continental”) motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay filed on July 19, 2012. See Docket No. 25. Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”) joined in the motion on November 1, 2012. See Docket No. 41. The plaintiff, Star Insuran

49 F.3d 541 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,621In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION/LINCOLN SAVINGS ANDLOAN SECURITIES LITIGATION,FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SANTA ANA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Charles H. KEATING, Jr., Defendant,andFirst Interstate Bank of California, as Trustee of FirstExecutive Corporation Indemnification Trust,Claimant-Appellant. No. 93-16639. Uni

Swinehart, J.: This is an appeal by plaintiff Continental American Corporation from the judgment of the District Court of Sedgwick County in favor of defendant Pacific Balloon Company, Inc., on defendant’s counterclaim for a setoff against the judgment in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff raises one issue on appeal: Did the evidence conclusively establish an account stated? In August of 1979, plaintiff purchased

105 B.R. 564 (1989) In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, Debtor. FEDERAL HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana insurance corporation, Movant, v. AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, Debtor/Respondent. Bankruptcy No. B-89-3117-PHX-SSC. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona. August 14, 1989.

Opinion CHIN, J. This case considers complex questions of insurance policy coverage interpretation in connection with a federal court-ordered cleanup of the state’s Stringfellow Acid Pits waste site. We initially address the “ ‘continuous injury’ trigger of coverage,” as that principle was explained in Montrose Chemical Corp. v.

119 B.R. 216 (1990) In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, Debtors. Nos. Civ. 89-1231 PHX-RMB, Civ. B 89-3117 PHX-RMB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. September 20, 1990. Peter L. Duncan, Jennings, Engstrand & Henrikson, San Diego, Cal., for debtors in possession. M. Laurence Popofsky, Peter J. Benvenutti, Heller, Ehrman, White &am;

794 F.Supp. 1424 (1992) In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION/LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN SECURITIES LITIGATION. MDL No. 834. United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 18, 1992. *1425 *1426 *1427 *1428

805 F.Supp. 1392 (1992) CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and AMR Corporation, Defendants. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and AMR Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. G-92-259, G-92-266. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. November 4, 1992.

OPINION OF THE COURT Kaye, J. At issue before us is an insurer’s duty to defend actions for personal injuries sustained through exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the insured’s predecessor corporation. We resolve the questions raised in favor of the insured, concluding that in the circumstances presented, the standard form comprehensive general liability (CGL) policy requires defense of the action

741 F.Supp. 1368 (1990) In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, Debtor. American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Savings and Loan Securities Litigation. Nos. CIV 89-1231 PHX-RMB, B-89-3117 PHX-RMB. MDL No. 834. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 2, 1990. *1369 P. John Owen, Morrison, Hecker, Curtis, K

824 F.Supp. 689 (1993) CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and AMR Corporation, Defendants. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and AMR Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. G-92-259, G-92-266. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. June 7, 1993.

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Taco Bell has sued two insurance companies, Zurich and Continental, each of which had issued it a liability-insurance policy. The basis of federal jurisdiction is diversity of citizenship, and the substantive issues are governed, the parties tacitly agree, by Illinois law. The suit seeks a declaration that the insurance companies have a duty to pay for T