Cases

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Rats. This case is about rats. Giant, inflatable rats, which unions use to demonstrate their unhappiness with employers that do not pay union-scale wages. Cats too — inflatable fat cats, wearing business suits and pinkie rings, strangling workers. Here is what they look like, as deployed during a labor dispute in the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin:

William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge In late March 2014, the Code Enforcement Officer for the Town of Grand Chute ordered a labor union to remove a giant inflatable rat it had staked to the ground in the public right-of-way of a main thoroughfare. The rat, along with a giant inflatable "fat cat" grasping a worker around the neck, were being used as part of a labor protest against a local business that was using a non-union contractor f

Wood, Chief Judge. Scabby the Rat has returned. Insofar as this case is concerned, he first made his appearance in the Town of Grand Chute, Wisconsin, in connection with a labor dispute there. When the Union could not persuade the district court to enjoin a Town ordinance forbidding Scabby's presence, it appealed to this court. We were concerned, however, that the case might be moot, be

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1739 CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL LABORERS’ UNION NO. 330, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF GRAND CHUTE, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distr

Nioiiols, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur and join in the court’s opinion except for Part V, headed Leased Line Subsidiaries. As to this. I dissent with all respect. *81The court here adopts without change the opinion recommended by Trial Judge Schwartz. While the latter, w

HOLLY L. TEETER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Eric Clark brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant City of Williamsburg, Kansas ("City") violated his constitutional rights under the First and Fourth Amendments.1 He also brings an inverse condemnation action

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

FRIENDLY, Presiding Judge: I. Introduction In this opinion we continue the discussion of the nature of the Rail Act in Part III of our opinion of October 18,1976, 425 F.Supp. at 270-71, and shall consider the constitutionality of compensating the transferors in other than cash, an issue on which we requested briefing by our notice of April 14, 1977. We shall also deal with certain of the issues o

Per Curiam. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. *971INDEX. ABATEMENT AND REVIVOR. A delay of eleven years in making application for revival of a proceeding is sufficient to render it the duty of the court to refuse to permit the revival as a mere matter of discretion. Matter of Palmer (Sup. Ct.), 538. See Pasties, 7; Sale, 2 ABDUCTI

44 F.Supp. 97 (1941) UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. Eq. No. 85-73. District Court, S. D. New York. September 30, October 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1941. *98 *99 *100 *101

PER CURIAM. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions of law certified to the Court of Appeals as questions of law which ought to he reviewed by said court-: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Charles B. Alexander? (2) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Henry M. Ale