Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Jackson L. Kiser, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 6, 2015,1 heard argument on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss. The parties have fully briefed the motions, and I have reviewed the relevant filings and arguments of counsel. For the reasons stated herein, I will grant Defendants’ motions and, accordingl

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED November 20, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 19-0200 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

578 F.Supp.2d 888 (2008) AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CAREY TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Florida corporation, and Great West Casualty Co., as subrogee of February Fourteen, Inc., Defendants. Carey Transportation, Inc., Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company, Counterclaim-Defendant. Carey Transportation, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Adriatic Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant.

315 F.Supp.2d 886 (2004) Angie CHEN, Plaintiff, v. MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, INC., Defendant. No. 99 C 6261. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 12, 2004. *887 *888 *889 *890

613 F.2d 890 102 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2361, 198 U.S.App.D.C. 157,87 Lab.Cas. P 11,584 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO andCouncil of North Atlantic Shipping Associations, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO andCouncil of North AtlanticShipping Associations, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Resp

ROBB, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The keystone of the majority opinion is the assertion that the Board erred by failing to consider “all the surrounding circumstances”, and in particular by ignoring the “traditional work patterns” of longshoremen. Proper consideration of the “relevant work patterns”, says the majority, “would have led to a different categorization for the work in controversy.” I do not agree. In

515 F.Supp. 1302 (1981) SIDARMA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI ARMAMENTO SPA, VENICE v. HOLT MARINE INDUSTRIES, INC., Holt Marine System Companies, Waterside Ocean Navigation of Pennsylvania, Thomas Holt, Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc., Holt Marine Terminal, Inc., B. H. Sobelman, Inc. and Holt Cargo Systems. No. 75 Civ. 6265 (RJW). United States District Court, S. D. New York.

346 F.Supp. 1116 (1972) BLOHM & VOSS AG, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL-GRACE LINES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 17959. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 20, 1972. J. Cookman Boyd, Jr., and Sauerwein, Boyd & Decker, Baltimore, Md., *1117 Francis T. Carr, Douglas G. Brace, C. Stephen Barrett, III, and Kenyon &

64 Cal.Rptr.3d 773 (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 165 P.3d 556 Robert GENTRY, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Circuit City Stores, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. S141502. Supreme Court of California. August 30, 2007. *776 Riordan & Horgan, Denn

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge! On July 20, 2009, following a 225-mile trek from her home in Pennsylvania, Plaintiff Debra Hartley arrived in Washington seeking to meet with Michelle Obama to express her concerns about sex discrimination in law enforcement. Standing on the sidewalk in front of the White House and wearing a

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1999 Doc: 73 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1999 KIERAN RAVI BHATTACHARYA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES B. MURRAY, JR., in his official capacity as Rector of t

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2064 Doc: 64 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 57 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1999 KIERAN RAVI BHATTACHARYA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES B. MURRAY, JR., in his official capacity as Rector of t

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In 2016, the Islamic Center of Culpeper (ICC) wished (and still wishes) to build a mosque. Local health authorities told the ICC its building site would not support normal septic methods, so it needed a special permit from the County. Historically, such permits were granted as a matter of course, with little fanfare or scrutiny. Officials eve

OPINION MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge. Plaintiffs Karen Rowland (“Ms. Rowland”), George Machen (“Mr. Machen”), Stacy Machen (“Mrs. Machen”), and Michelle Pratt Orr (“Ms. Orr”) bring strict liability and negligence claims against the Defendant, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“NPC”), alleging that they or their spouse developed a painful and permanently disfiguring condition as a result o

(2008) Wayne P. SULLIVAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL HELICOPTERS, INT'L, et al., Defendants. Civil No. L-07-2825. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM BENSON EVERETT LEGG, Chief Judge. In November 2005, Plaintiffs Wayne P. Sullivan and Sullivan & Sons, Inc. ("Sullivan's") used a truck-mounted crane to m

LANCE M. AFRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE When Nelson and Lazaro Arce decided to challenge the Louisiana criminal justice system's treatment of the deaf, the Court doubts that they anticipated having to navigate through two of the murkiest waters in American law: federalism and separation of powers. Yet this case raises weighty questions about the federal government's authority to provide private citizens with the power to haul

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 30, 2011, the Plaintiff Charles Evans (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Defendant United States of America (the “Defendant”). The Plaintiff asserts negligence claims pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 (“the FTCA”), and § 5102 of New York State’s No-Fault Insurance Law (“N.Y. Ins. Law” or the “No-Fault L

760 F.Supp.2d 1272 (2010) Harold ARNOLD, for himself and all other similarly situated, Jimmy Jaramillo, for himself and all other similarly situated, Gary Wise, for himself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF ARIZONA, an Arizona corporation; Farmers Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Defendants. No. CIV 09-0330 JB/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexic

61 F.Supp.2d 724 (1999) MIAMI COUNTY INCINERATOR QUALIFIED TRUST, Plaintiff, v. ACME WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-96-101. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. July 21, 1999. *725 *726 Andrew Seth Lipton, Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook, Cincinnat

762 F.Supp.2d 584 (2011) Brian G. McNAMEE, Plaintiff, v. William Roger CLEMENS, Defendant. No. 09 CV 1647(SJ)(CLP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 3, 2011. *588 Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, by Earl Ward, Richard D. Emery, Debra L. Greenberger, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Steptoe & J