⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Constance Lynn Anderson”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013-06-21 · Published · cited 1× · 989 N.E.2d 823; 2013 WL 3147332; 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 292
OPINION MAY, Judge. Constance Anderson appeals following her convictions of two counts of Class D felony criminal mischief 1 and five counts of Class A misdemeanor animal cruelty. 2 She presents two issues for review:
State v. Andersonpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 1993-04-13 · Published · cited 4× · 850 P.2d 669; 174 Ariz. 431; 137 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3; 1993 Ariz. LEXIS 33
174 Ariz. 431 (1993) 850 P.2d 669 STATE of Arizona, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Jeffrey Lynn ANDERSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. CR-92-0095-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. April 13, 1993. Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Div., Daniel J. Kiley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee/cross-appell
State v. Andersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 181 Ariz. 18; 887 P.2d 548; 142 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22; 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 125
OPINION on Remand, HATHAWAY, Judge. This case is before us on remand from our supreme court, State v. Anderson, 174 Ariz. 431, 850 P.2d 669 (App.1993), for consideration of the state’s cross-appeal which we did not consider in view of our reversal of appellant’s conviction. See State v. Anderson, 171 Ariz. 377, 831 P.2d 376 (App.1991), for the facts of the case.
State v. Andersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 171 Ariz. 377; 831 P.2d 376; 101 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 85; 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 316
ROLL, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority reverses defendant Jeffrey Lynn Anderson’s convictions for three counts of sexual assault because of questions asked of character witnesses by the prosecutor. FACTS The evidence was overwhelming. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the verdict, State v.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
06/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 27, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WESLEY LYNN HATMAKER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Campbell County No. 17253 Paul G. Summers, Judge ___________________________________
In Re Farleypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2003-06-23 · Published · cited 1× · 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108; 109 Cal. App. 4th 1356; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 6871; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5487; 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 935
1 Cal.Rptr.3d 108 (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1356 In re Lionel FARLEY on Habeas Corpus. No. C041492. Court of Appeal, Third District. June 23, 2003. Review Denied October 15, 2003. *109 Lionel Farley, in pro. per. S. Lynne Klein, Los Angeles, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petiti
Brandt v. Brandtpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994-10-27 · Published · cited 4× · 523 N.W.2d 264; 1994 N.D. LEXIS 230; 1994 WL 587061
523 N.W.2d 264 (1994) Sandra BRANDT, Appellant, v. Dennis BRANDT, Appellee. Civ. No. 940097. Supreme Court of North Dakota. October 27, 1994. Constance L. Triplett of Triplett Law Office, Grand Forks, for appellant; submitted on brief. Kevin B. Spaeth of Spaeth, Thelen, Dearstyne & Van Voorhis, Grand Forks, for appellee; submitted on brief. Lynn An
District Court, S.D. New York · 1956-07-23 · Published · cited 14× · 144 F. Supp. 543; 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2801
144 F.Supp. 543 (1956) Constance P. ANDERSON, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Clyde L. Anderson, deceased, and as mother, next friend, guardian and trustee of and for Mary Lou Anderson, Clyde Thomas Anderson, Lynne Anderson, Christian A. Anderson, Anne Anderson, Elaine Anderson, Fay Anderson and Jerome Anderson, Infants, Plaintiff, v. BRITISH OVERSEAS AIRWAYS CORPORATION, South African Airways and the de Havilland Aircraft Co.
United States Tax Court · 1984-12-05 · Published · cited 4× · 83 T.C. 898; 1984 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 6; 83 T.C. No. 48
Cohen, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies as follows: Year ended Deficiency Docket Petitioners No. $32,598 Morris E. and Marlene H. Anderson 2761-83 OO t> 05 tH 32,226 Robert K. and Shirley S. Clawson 2763-83 OO r-05 r — 1 The primary
District Court, D. Kansas · 2007-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 473 F. Supp. 2d 1162; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11035; 2007 WL 446745
473 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2007) JP MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, National Association, in its capacity as Trustee of the FI Liquidating Trust, on behalf of Farmland Industries, Inc., now known as Reorganized FLI, Inc., Plaintiff, v. MID-AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 05-2231-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 12, 2007.
District Court, S.D. New York · 1956-04-26 · Published · cited 3× · 149 F. Supp. 68; 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2295
PALMIERI, District Judge. This is an action for wrongful death. The decedent, a citizen of Utah at the time of his death, was a passenger on a de Havilland Comet transport plane on April 8, 1954, when it exploded over the Mediterranean Sea. Defendant The de Havilland Aircraft Co., Ltd. (de Havilland), manufacturer of the plane, moves pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., to quash service of process and dis
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-09-13 · Published · cited 22× · 837 F.3d 1107; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16762; 2016 WL 4756942
ROBRENO, District Judge: Before the Court is an appeal by Wallace Dean-Mitchell of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, which was denied by the district court for the Northern District of Alabama. For the reasons set forth below, we will reverse the decision of the *1110 district court gr
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 70× · 749 F.3d 879
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011-05-25 · Published · cited 1× · 259 P.3d 79; 243 Or. App. 52; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 694
259 P.3d 79 (2011) 243 Or. App. 52 Suzanne J. WATKINS, Thomas A. Amburn, Lorna Lynn Inman, Marilane Jorgenson, Jeffry Lee Michael, Eva L.I. Arce, David A. Bassett, Helen M. Connelly, Daniel Converse, Gilbert Covarrubias, Edwin F. Cramp, Michael Gould, Laurie Hansen, Cecilia Hay, Philip R. Killian, Donna Lipparelli, R. Lucas, Jackie McBee, Michael Doyle Perkins, Ernest A. Peters, Constance L. Roach, Sara Rubrecht, Michael G. Sanche
District Court, D. Maryland · 1995-08-21 · Published · cited 16× · 909 F. Supp. 304; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17821; 1995 WL 708272
909 F.Supp. 304 (1995) Constance CHAGHERVAND, Plaintiff, v. CAREFIRST, et al., Defendants. HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF the MID-ATLANTIC, INC. t/a CareFirst, Plaintiff, v. Harry CHASE, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. MJG-93-1097, MJG-93-3943. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. August 21, 1995. *305</
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008-08-29 · Published · cited 2× · 3 So. 3d 859; 2008 Ala. LEXIS 182; 2008 WL 3990787
3 So.3d 859 (2008) BON AVENTURE, L.L.C., and William Staggers v. CRAIG DYAS L.L.C. and Olympia Corte Dyas. 1051679. Supreme Court of Alabama. August 29, 2008. *860 James Lynn Perry of Daniell, Upton, Perry & Morris, P.C., Daphne; and Constance S. Barker of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, for appellants. Allan R.
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 79 F. Supp. 3d 1136; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20003; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5806; 2015 WL 191375
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [116] AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PREEMPTION CLAIM [117] AND PARTIAL JUDGMENT AS TO PREEMPTION CLAIM STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief touches upon a topic impacting gourmands’ stomaches and animal-rights activists’ hearts: foie gras.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007-07-30 · Published · cited 2× · 498 F. Supp. 2d 402; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54963; 2007 WL 2176972
498 F.Supp.2d 402 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to City of New York et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 04-cv-06054, et al. County of Nassau v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 05-cv-10179. MDL No. 1456, Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.<
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 22 F. App'x 80
SUMMARY ORDER This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Preska’s Endorsement dated April 2, 2001.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-10-15 · Published · cited 78× · 504 F.3d 1281; 85 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1085; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 24095; 2007 WL 2983673
504 F.3d 1281 (2007) IMMUNOCEPT, LLC, Patrice Anne Lee, and James Reese Matson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2006-1432. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 15, 2007. Rehearing Denied November 9, 2007. *1282 Jon R. Stark, Chao Hadidi Stark &a;