Cases

699 F.Supp. 327 (1988) NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. BURFORD, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-2238. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 4, 1988. Kathleen C. Zimmerman, Norman L. Dean, Jr., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Fred R. Disheroon, Susan V. Cook, Pauline H. Milius, Jacques B.

575 F.3d 504 (2009) SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DRESSER-RAND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-40715. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 9, 2009. *505 Russell Stanley Post (argued), Andrea Jean Paterson, Constance H. Pfeiffer, Curt Webb, Beck, Redden & Secrest, Houston, T

676 F.Supp. 271 (1985) NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. BURFORD, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-2238. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 4, 1985. *272 Norman L. Dean, Jr., Kathleen C. Zimmerman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Susan V. Cook, Pauline

676 F.Supp. 280 (1986) NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. BURFORD, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-2238. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 10, 1986. Norman L. Dean, Jr., Kathleen C. Zimmerman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Susan V. Cook, Pauline H. Milius, Jacques B. Gelin, Washington,

348 S.C. 152 (2001) 558 S.E.2d 917 The STATE, Appellant, v. Linda Thompson TAYLOR, Respondent. No. 3425. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 4, 2001. Decided December 17, 2001. Rehearing Denied January 17, 2002. Certiorari Granted May 30, 2002. *15

438 S.E.2d 745 (1994) STATE of North Carolina v. Norman Ray PARKER. No. 9222SC1143. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 4, 1994. *746 Atty. Gen. Michael F. Easley by Sr. Deputy Atty. Gen. Isham B. Hudson, Jr., Raleigh, for the State. Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr. by Asst. Appellate Defender Constance <

292 S.C. 76 (1987) 354 S.E.2d 909 Ida Mae WOODS, Respondent v. Eloise Limehouse BIVENS, et al., Defendants, of whom the Defendant Louise W. Limehouse, is Appellant, and the Defendants, Eula Mae Limehouse, Annie Mae L. Bowick, June Laverne L. Murdock, Orvelle Constance Hershey are Respondents. Appeal of Louise W. LIMEHOUSE. 22707 Supreme Court of South Carolina.

MCDONALD, J.: In this marital litigation, Lori Dandridge Stoney (Wife) contends the family court erred in (1) permitting Theodore D. Stoney Jr. (Brother) to intervene or, in the alternative, failing to control the extent of this intervention; (2) denying Wife’s motion to reopen on the basis of newly discovered evidence; (3) imputing income of only $100,000 per year to Richard S.W. Stoney Sr. (Husband); (4) failing to award Wif

96 N.Y.2d 418 (2001) 754 N.E.2d 1085 730 N.Y.S.2d 1 In the Matter of MOHAMED ALIESSA, by His Guardian ad Litem, SUMAYA AL FAYAD, et al., Appellants, v. ANTONIA NOVELLO, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued March 29, 2001. Decided June 5, 2001.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. Currently before the Court, in this employment discrimination action filed by Kelly Seale and David Seale (“Plaintiffs”) against the above-captioned government entity1 and five named individuals (“Defendants”), is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c) and/or to dismi

FINE, J. Robin Hitashi Guy appeals from her conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, in violation of sections 161.16(2) (b)l and 161.41(lm)(c)l, Stats. She challenges the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress the cocaine.1 The question presented by the appeal is whether law enforcement officers executing a validly issued search warrant may frisk a person on the premises for

837 So.2d 1010 (2002) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, General Motors Corporation Buick, Oldsmobile, Cadillac Group, and General Motors Corporation Oldsmobile Division, Appellants, v. Robert J. McGEE, Individually, Constance McGee, Individually, Kelly Amber McGee, a Minor, through her Parents and Natural Guardians, Robert J. McGee and Constance McGee, and Robert J. McGee and Constance McGee, as Personal Representatives of the Es

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

43 Cal.4th 757 (2008) In re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.][1] No. S147999. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 2008. *765 Alliance Defense Fund, Benjamin W. Bull, Glen Lavy, Timothy Donald Chandler, Christopher R. Stovall, Dale Schowengerdt; Advocates for Faith and Freedom, Robert Henry Tyler; Law Offices of Terr

"The opinion of the Court was delivered by Levy, J. The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages- to ‘the amount of fifty thousand dollars, on account of injuries alleged to have been received by her husband, in being run over by the car belonging to the railroad company (defendant), which injuries, she alleges, resulted in the death of said husband. The case was tried by a jury, and ■there was a verdict

Campbell, C. J., delivered the opinion of the court. The opinion of the trial judge, Honorable Joseph L. Cant-well, Jr., sufficiently states the issues involved in this litigation and the reasons which support the decree. It follows: “Complainant, who alleges that he is a citizen, resident, taxpayer and property owner of the City of Bristol, Va., files his bill herein, assailing the