Cases

Matter of Conrad v Conrad (2022 NY Slip Op 07341) Matter of Conrad v Conrad 2022 NY Slip Op 07341 Decided on December 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

981 A.2d 327 (2009) CONRAD v. CONRAD. No. 2059 EDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. June 17, 2009. Affirmed.

Spain, J. Appeal from that part of a judgment of the Supreme Court (Nolan, Jr., J.), entered March 29, 2004 in Saratoga County, granting plaintiff a divorce, upon a decision of the court. The parties were married on July 24, 1976 and there are no children of this union. Alleging marital difficulties since 1995, plaintiff commenced an action for divorce in March 2003 on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatmen

612 S.E.2d 772 (2005) 216 W.Va. 696 Jeanette Sue CONRAD, Petitioner Below, Appellant v. Delmer Wayne CONRAD, Respondent Below, Appellee. and Jeanette Sue Conrad, Petitioner Below, Appellee v. Delmer Wayne Conrad, Respondent Below, Appellant. Nos. 31747, 31748. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 12, 2005.

FLETCHER, Chief Justice, dissenting. The majority changes the well-established rule that an existing domicile continues until a new domicile is established and ignores the fact that under federal tax law, a person may be a “bona fide resident” of a foreign country and still maintain a U. S. domicile. Therefore, I dissent. In Williams v. Williams, this Court, held that for the purpose

76 S.W.3d 305 (2002) Clifford Lee CONRAD, Respondent, v. Cathie Lane CONRAD, Appellant. No. WD 59250. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 4, 2002. *306 John W. Dennis, Jr., Independence, for Respondent. R. Gregory Gore, Independence, for Appellant. Before ELLIS, P.J., and EDWIN H. SMITH and HOWARD, JJ.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated April 18, 2001, which, inter alia, denied his motion to strike the plaintiffs note of issue, (2), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated July 19, 2001, as denied his motion for leave to reargue, and (3) an order of the same court (Schachner, R.), dated October 19, 2001,

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Henry Conrad, appeals from a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Division decision setting his child support payments. {¶ 2} Appellant and plaintiff-appellee, Kathryn Conrad, were divorced on December 30, 2003. At that time, the parties had shared parenting of their child Taylor and neither party paid child support to the other.

PARKER, Judge. Wendy Conrad appeals a nonfinal order entered after a final order on an authorized motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(4). The order under appeal found the wife in willful civil contempt of a court order which required the parties and the minor child to submit to paternity blood-testing. We reverse because the order that the trial court referenced in its contempt order did not requi

[Cite as State v. Conrad, 2024-Ohio-2986.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. Nos. 30809, 30888 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JASON CONRAD

[Cite as Conrad v. Hamrick, 2025-Ohio-1773.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY TRAVIS J. CONRAD, CASE NO. 10-24-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. GARY L. HAMRICK, ET AL., OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1714 Filed September 25, 2019 BRIANNA CONRAD, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. CHARLES CONRAD, JR., Respondent-Appellee. ___________________________________ CHARLES CONRAD, JR., Petitioner-Appellee, vs. BRIANNA CONRAD, Respondent-Appellant. _______________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn

Dugger v Conrad (2020 NY Slip Op 07313) Dugger v Conrad 2020 NY Slip Op 07313 Decided on December 08, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

FIKE, P.J., — This case is before the court on defendant’s objections to bifurcation. *40Plaintiff has requested the court to enter a divorce decree under Divorce Code section 201(d), on the basis that the parties have lived separate and apart for more than two years, even though collateral economic claims have not been decided. Defendant objects

Conrad v DeMunda (2022 NY Slip Op 02906) Conrad v DeMunda 2022 NY Slip Op 02906 Decided on April 29, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Dugger v Conrad (2020 NY Slip Op 07313) Dugger v Conrad 2020 NY Slip Op 07313 Decided on December 08, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

People v Conrad (2021 NY Slip Op 02194) People v Conrad 2021 NY Slip Op 02194 Decided on April 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA REBECCA CHRISTY and SAMUEL ) CHRISTY, ) Sup

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Steven Conrad, : Petitioner : : No. 557 C.D. 2022 v. : : Submitted: March 31, 2023 Department of Transportation : (Workers’ Compensation : Appeal Board), : Respondent B