Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Conrad D. Castaneda”
Crawford v. Senex Law, P.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”). The matter is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated, the motion will be denied. Background The following summary of the facts, take
United States v. Tsarnaevpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER O’TOOLE, District Judge. I. Introduction On June 27, 2013, a grand jury returned an indictment that charges the defendant with multiple crimes arising from the detonation of two improvised explosive devices at the 2013 Boston Marathon. The defendant has moved to dismiss the indictment and stay proceedings, arguing various violations of the Distri
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Hill v. Kansas Gas Service Co.public domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2002) Justin HILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KANSAS GAS SERVICE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-2315-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 12, 2002. *1201 C. Edward Peterson, Stuart W. Conrad, Flinnegan, Conrad & Peterson, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. John P. DeCour
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
University of Houston v. Barthpublic domain
OPINION LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice. This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of appellant’s, the University of Houston (UH), plea to the jurisdiction.1 Appellee, Stephen Barth, a *160tenured professor at the UH Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel Management (Hilton College), filed suit against UH unde
the University of Houston v. Stephen Barthpublic domain
Opinion issued June 30, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The
Paulin Soto Soria v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-10-00161-CR; 07-10-00162-CR; 07-10-00163-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ------------------------------------
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAD J. COLLINS, Bankruptcy Judge. PW Enterprises, Inc. (PWE), an unsecured creditor of Debtor, Racing Services, Inc. (RSI), filed this adversary proceeding on February 2, 2006. PWE asserted various claims for relief, including disallowance of the State’s claim for unpaid taxes, denial of priority status for the State’s claim, equitable subordination of the State’s claim, and the avoi
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Paulin Soto Soria v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-10-00161-CR; 07-10-00162-CR; 07-10-00163-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 27, 2012 PAULIN SOTO SORIA, APPELLANT v. THE STATE O
People v. Aguilerapublic domain
Filed 6/17/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D075381 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCS304369) MARIO IVAN AGUILERA et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a
In Re Bowerspublic domain
40 Cal.App.3d 359 (1974) 114 Cal. Rptr. 665 In re ALFONZO BOWERS on Habeas Corpus. Docket No. 6135. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. June 28, 1974. *360 COUNSEL Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Jack R. Winkler and Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Dani
Drum v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Unionpublic domain
OPINION ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge. This action arises from plaintiff’s heretofore unsuccessful efforts to obtain supplemental and other benefits from his employer, the New York Post (“The Post”) which were allegedly due him under his union’s collective bargaining agreement with the Post. Drum, who had been employed by the Post since 1966 as a chauffeur/route-man, was injured in an automobile accide
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
Mendia v. Garciapublic domain
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bernardo Mendia’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Mot. to Am., Dkt. No. 101. Defendants John M. Garcia, Ching Chang, and the Un
633 F.Supp.2d 949 (2009) In Re: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases Except: Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. Bush, No. C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v. Bush, No. C 07-1115; Guzzi v. Bush, No. C 06-6225; Shubert v. Bush, No. C 07-0693; Clayton et al. v. AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., et al., C 07-1187; *950 Un
United States v. Bushaypublic domain
ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jerome Bushay’s objections [489] to Magistrate Judge Baverman’s Report and Recommendation (the “R & R”) [476], which recommends that the Court deny Bushay’s motion to suppress statements [155]; motion to suppress evidence [156]; motion to suppress search and seizure re: 6746 Grey Rock Way [279 &
Woodrum v. Woodward Countypublic domain
NELSON, Circuit Judge: Larry Woodrum was awarded physical custody of his two children, Trina and Larry John, on November 17, 1983 in San Diego Superior Court. This action arises from a series of child abuse reports made by Jayne Rosson, mother of the children, and subsequent investigations conducted by both the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (“Oklahoma”) and the County of San Luis Obispo Social Services Department (“S
Woodrum v. Woodward Countypublic domain
866 F.2d 1121 13 Fed.R.Serv.3d 390 John WOODRUM, Margo Woodrum, Larry Dean Woodrum, and SherylWoodrum, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WOODWARD COUNTY, OKLAHOMA; Mickie Garrison, in herindividual capacity as social worker, Woodward County,Oklahoma; Elizabeth Zarella, in her individual capacity aschild welfare supervisor and social worker, Woodward County,Oklahoma; San Luis Obispo County, Californi