Cases

Panel: Wright, Nazarian, Alan M. Wilner (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. Wright, J. *298 BACKGROUND In February 2016 in the Circuit Court for Charles County, Romechia Simms, appellant, was found not criminally responsible

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 28 Docket: Ken-20-163 Argued: February 9, 2021 Decided: May 13, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. STEPHEN DOANE v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CONNORS, J. [¶1] Stephen Doane, MD, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (

HOTTEN, J. This appeal concerns the Maryland Department of Agriculture’s (“MDA”) decision to exempt nutrient management plans (“NMPs”)1 from public disclosure in response to a Public Information Act request. An NMP “indicates how essential primary nutrients, that is, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, are to be annually managed on farm fields for crop production and for the protection of water qu

198 F.Supp.2d 678 (2002) Cecilia Y. CHYU, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, Defendant. No. Civ. H-01-3705. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 30, 2002. *679 Cecilia Y. Chyu, Ellicott City, MD, for Plaintiff. James C. Anagnos, Office of the Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Def

Opinion by Salmon, Jr. Franklin David Long (“Long”) filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County against the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (“the Department”) in which he asked the court to declare: (1) That the Plaintiff be removed from the Maryland Sex Off

Filed: October 23, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1512 (SPA-05-06) THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, Petitioner, v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, Respondent. -------------------- NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ELDER LAW ATTORNEYS,

894 A.2d 584 (2006) 391 Md. 643 Audrey WALTON, et al. v. MARINER HEALTH OF MARYLAND, INC. No. 33, September Term, 2005. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 14, 2006. *586 Benjamin J. Woolery (McGill & Woolery, on brief), of Bowie, Ron M Landsman (Ron M. Landsman, P.A. on brief), of Rockville, for appel

570 F.Supp.2d 749 (2008) COZEN O'CONNOR, a Professional Corporation v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. Civil Action No. 05-4332. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 7, 2008. *762 Elliott R. Feldman, Adam C. Bonin, Cozen & O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Cozen O'Connor. Elizabeth J. Shapiro, Jo

09/27/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2018 CHARLES GLEN CONNOR v. STATE OF TENNESSEE1 Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2012-B-1666 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge ___

Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Barry A. Harrison, Wesley T. Roach, and Dwayne M. Hawkins (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against their employer, South Carolina Department of Mental Health (“Defendant”). In accordance with 28 U.S.

870 A.2d 168 (2005) 385 Md. 534 Robert A. SCHWARTZ, et al. v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. No. 94, September Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 14, 2005. *170 Matthew A. Egeli (Hartman and Egeli, LLP, Anapolis, on brief), for appellants. Rachel L. Eisenhauer, Asst. Atty. Ge

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1530 CHELSEA C. ELINE; MEGAN A. BRYANT; ROSE R. MACGREGOR; CHRISTINE E. COLEMAN; ANGELA A. URBAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. TOWN OF OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee, and RICHARD W. MEEHAN; JOSEPH J. THEOBALD; ROSS C. BUZZURO,

Maryland Department of Health v. Shawn Orland Myers, Jr., et al., Nos. 1901, 2074, 2150, 2162, 2163, 2280, 2281, 2283, 2284, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2289, 2290, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Graeff, J. CONSTRUCTIVE CIVIL CONTEMPT — STATUTORY SANCTIONS — DUE PROCESS Where the court finds an individual to be incompetent to stand trial (“IST”) and dangerous and commits the individual to the Maryland Department of Health (the “Department”) with an order to admit the defendant to a designated health f

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges HENDERSON, ■BROWN, and GRIFFITH join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: This case raises a serious constitutional question about the 2010 Affordable Care Act, one of the most consequential laws ever enacted by Congress. Did Congress’s enactment of the Act comport with the Origination Clause of the Constitution? The Orig

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Individual DOH Defendants’1 Motion and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Procedural Due Process Claims on the Basis of Qualified Immunity (“Motion to Dismiss Procedural Due Process Claims”), [Doc. 267], the Individual DOH Defendants’ Moti

Ellen Lipton Hollander, United States District Judge The State of Maryland filed a declaratory and injunctive action, seeking, among other things, a declaration as to the constitutionality and enforceability of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (Mar. 23, 2010), as amended by t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAI CARE CENTERS OF MARYLAND I, LLC Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-3151 (TJK) U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE- MENT Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff provided outpatient renal dialysis services to nine beneficiaries of a federal-gov- ernment-spons

792 A.2d 1130 (2002) 368 Md. 160 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF the ENVIRONMENT v. George UNDERWOOD, et al. No. 48 Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 5, 2002. Reconsideration Denied April 8, 2002. *1131 J. Van Lear Dorsey, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney Genera

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 24, 2013 Decided November 1, 2013 No. 13-5069 FRANCIS A. GILARDI, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columb

Lanzinger, J. {¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether the statute of limitations begins to run for a malicious prosecution claim when a grand jury issues a no-bill of indictment, or when the prosecutor later determines not to pursue any further criminal charges against the plaintiff. We hold that a cause of action accrues for *287malicious prosecution wh