Cases

01/31/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 7, 2018 Session MCKAYLA TAYLOR v. MIRIAM’S PROMISE ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 2017-CV-123 Amy V. Hollars, Judge ___________________________________

423 F.Supp.2d 708 (2006) Denise HUGHES and Bob Hughes, Plaintiffs, v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING, a Michigan municipal corporation; Bruce King, individually and as Executive Director of Region VII Area Agency on Aging; Drew Orvosh, individually and as Assistant Director of Region VII Area Agency on Aging; Brian K. Edler; and Learman, Peters, Sarow & McQuillan, P.L.C., Defendants. No. 04-10355 BC.

196 B.R. 780 (1996) In re Connie BUMPASS, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-13771. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee, Southern Division. June 7, 1996. *781 Barbara Arthur, Rossville, Georgia, for Debtor. *782 Richard Klingler, Kennedy, Fulton, Koontz & Farinash, Chattanooga, Tennessee,

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6374 THERL TAYLOR, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VIRGINIA GRUBBS; PAMALA SMITH; ANN HALLMAN; SHERMAN ANDERSON, Present Chief; VALERIE JONES; SUPERVISOR RANDALL WILLIAMS; JOHN PATE; ALLENDALE FAIRFAX COUNTY-CITY, Defendants – Appellees. No

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 357 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 358 OPINION Appellant appeals his state jail felony conviction for evading arrest b

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 22, 2013 Session DONNA PERDUE v. ESTATE OF DANIEL JACKSON, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hardeman County No. 17349 Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor No. W2012-02710-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 12, 2013 The trial court granted summary judgment in this declaratory jud

ACCEPTED 13-15-00070-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/14/2015 1:23:44 PM CECILE FOY GSANGER

226 Kan. 277 (1979) 597 P.2d 646 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CONNIE ANN BATES, Appellant. No. 50,318 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 14, 1979. William L. Fry, of Shultz, Fry & Fisher, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Robert J. Sandilos, assistant district attorney, argued

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are 18 residents of Smith Township, Mahoning County, Ohio, who reside within the service area of the Sebring Village Waterworks System. They brought this civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, against, inter alia, the Village of Sebring and its council members and manager. Plaintiffs challenge Sebring’s recently enacted ordinances providing that the

791 F.Supp. 1294 (1992) Glenda F. COOLEY, Mary A. Tate Campbell, Barbara G. Myers, Joyce Ann Layne Rollins, Connie Rancene Kilgore Parson Dykes, Georgia Ruth Nolan Henry, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Nos. CIV-1-88-100 to 1-88-105. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. March 31, 1992. *1295<

54 S.W.3d 1 (2001) Joe R. WILKINSON, et al., Appellants, v. DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, The City of Dallas, and The City of Fort Worth, Appellees. No. 05-99-01028-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. January 17, 2001. *5 Walter W. Leonard, Fort Worth, for appellants. Joseph G. Werner, Haynes & Boon

36 F.3d 517 Mark E. WAYNE; Carla L. Wayne; Roland L. Kendrick; BretE. Smith; Brenda S. Smith; Robert J. Rouse, Jr.; SharonRouse; Donald G. Stillion; Beverly J. Stillion; WilliamH. Tuel; Marjorie R. Tuel; Claude J. Bailey; Margaret J.Bailey; Larry L. Hartley; Kathleen J. Hartley; Judy K.Costello; Nancy Stuchell; and Jeffrey Stuchell,Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,v.VILLAGE OF SEBRING; J. Mich

Opinion DAVIS, J. I. Introduction Pursuant to Government Code section 68073, county boards of supervisors are to provide “suitable” rooms for holding superior, municipal and justice courts and “sufficient” attendants, equipment, furniture and supplies necessary for the transaction of the business of the court.1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-DP-00689-SCT TONY TERRELL CLARK v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/21/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN H. EMFINGER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BENTLEY E. CONNER WILLIAM R. LABARRE WESLEY THOMAS EVANS JOHN K. BRAMLE

12 Md. App. 449 (1971) 279 A.2d 473 MOSES MILLS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 545, September Term, 1970. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 30, 1971. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ANDERSON and MORTON, JJ. Morris Lee Kaplan, with whom was Michael Lee Kaplan on the brief, for appellant.

658 F.Supp. 1126 (1987) James Thomas EDMONDS, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Bruce Michael SWITZER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Stephen C. WOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Alfred L. HEBERT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 75-1624-8, 78-0053-8, 78-0004-

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 4, 2008 April 22, 2008 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Lesley Hornby a/k/a Lesley Lawson a/k/a Twiggy v. TJX Companies, In

TRAYNOR, C. J. This appeal is automatic from a judgment imposing the death penalty. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) In a previous trial defendant had been found guilty of the first degree murders of Connie Mack and Mary Mack, and sentenced to death. The judgment was reversed on the ground that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the issue of

91 F.Supp.2d 141 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Francis P. SALEMME, et al. United States of America v. John Martorano Nos. Cr. 94-10287-MLW, Cr. 97-10009-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 15, 1999. Clerical Corrections, December 23, 1999. *142

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of former employees of Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), sued Defendant in state court for fraud arising out of alleged misrepresentations made in encouraging Plaintiffs to take an early retirement benefits package. Defendant removed the case to federal court on the basis of complete preemption under the Employee Retire