Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Conley v. Internal Revenue Service”
Tashjian v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
325 B.R. 56 (2005) Robert J. TASHJIAN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. CIV.A. No. 03-40162-FDS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. March 14, 2005. *57 John J. Lorden, Harvard, MA, for Plaintiff. Lydia Bottome Turanchik, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Clary Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuepublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1573 Doc: 38 Filed: 05/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 18 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1573 CLARY HOOD, INC., Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Ap
Ramos v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
351 F.Supp.2d 5 (2004) William Negron RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. 1:04-CV-540(LEK/RFT). United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 28, 2004. *6 *7 William Negron Ramos, Kingston, NY, pro se. Karen Wozniak, U.S. Department of Justice, Washingt
ENTRY ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS James M. Carr, United States Bankruptcy Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (and Brief in Support) filed by the United States of America (“IRS”) on July 27, 2015 (Docket No. 16) (the “Motion”), Debtors’ Response to United States’ Motion for Judgment on the Plead
Harriman v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
233 F.Supp.2d 451 (2002) Joan HARRIMAN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. 96 CV 3670 (JS) (MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 2, 2002. *452 *453 Joan Harriman, East Hampton, NY, pro se. Bartholomew Cirenza, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of J
Fenceroy v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
153 F.Supp.2d 893 (2001) Warren FENCEROY and Edna Fenceroy, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:98-CV-2718-L. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 28, 2001. *894 Noah A. Fenceroy, Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiffs. Edna Fenceroy, D
Celauro v. United States, Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
411 F.Supp.2d 257 (2006) Sal CELAURO, Jr., Paul S. Astrup, Rosanne B. Astrup, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Lawrence Engle, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Smith's Aerospace, Inc., Teacher's Federal Credit Union DCS Transport & Logistics Solutions, Defendants. No. 05-CV-02245-ADS-WDW. United States District Court, E.D. New York. January
Bailey v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
ORDER ROLL, District Judge. On July 16, 1998, Plaintiff filed his second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Terlizzi for report and recommendation pursuant to the Local Rules of this Court. On December 7, 1998, Judge Terlizzi filed a report and recommendation. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed objections to Judge Terlizzi’s report and recommen
KORMAN, Chief Judge. This appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William C. Conner, Judge) squarely presents the issue whether taxpayers may seek to recover damages against employees of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for undertaking an audit in retaliation for the exercise by a taxpayer
208 F.Supp.2d 698 (2002) Travis S. LOOFBOURROW, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. CIV.A. H-01-3060. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. April 15, 2002. *699 *700 Travis S. Loofbourrow, Houston, TX, Pro se. Jonathan R. Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty.
United States of America and Conley E. Lemons, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Al Johnsonpublic domain
LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal the Internal Revenue Service seeks review of an order by the District Court for the Southern District of Florida which modifies an order to enforce two Internal Revenue summonses. I. The first summons in question, dated May 5, 1971, directed th
Plant v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
943 F.Supp. 833 (1996) Philip R. PLANT, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 5:96-CV-1236. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 25, 1996. *834 Philip R. Plant, Orrville, OH, pro se. Kathleen L. Midian, Annette G. Butler, Office of U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, S. R
Watts v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
925 F.Supp. 271 (1996) Michael H. WATTS and Barbara Watts, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, J.J. Jennings, IRS District Director, IRS Revenue Officer L. Walling, and IRS Manager Ms. Cynthia Moody, Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-5437. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 19, 1996. *272
In Re Raymond T Conley Trustpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re RAYMOND T. CONLEY TRUST. WALLACE CONLEY and KATHLEEN MEYERS, FOR PUBLICATION July 18, 2024 Appellants,
Coolman v. United States Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
117 F.Supp.2d 943 (2000) Michael E. COOLMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and Barbara Donahoo, Defendants. No. 8:99CV471. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. April 26, 2000. *944 *945 Michael E. Coolman, Syracuse, NE, Pro se. Evan J. Davis, U.S.
In Re Raymond T Conley Trustpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re RAYMOND T. CONLEY TRUST. WALLACE CONLEY and KATHLEEN MEYERS, FOR PUBLICATION August 22, 2024 Appellants,
DECISION ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge. The complaint in this adversary proceeding asks the court to equitably subordinate a portion of the Internal Revenue Service’s priority tax claim because it has failed to pursue the collection of those taxes from a third party who, allegedly, is also responsible for their payment. The United States contends that the complaint fails to state a claim up
Fostvedt v. United States, Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
824 F.Supp. 978 (1993) Robert J. FOSTVEDT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 91-F-1791. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 23, 1993. *979 *980 Robert J. Fostvedt, pro se. Michael J. Norton, U.S. Atty., William G. Pharo
Conley v. City of St. Louispublic domain
SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J. Introduction Maurice Conley (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment affirming the decision of the City of St. Louis Civil Service Commission (the Commission) affirming his dismissal from employment by the City of St. Louis Airport Police Department (APD), effective May 7, 2015. We affirm. Procedural Background Appellant was an Ai
MUNICIPAL REVENUE SERVICE, INC. v. Xspand, Inc.public domain
700 F.Supp.2d 692 (2010) MUNICIPAL REVENUE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. XSPAND, INC. and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 4:05-cv-671. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 31, 2010. *696 John G. Dean, Elliott Greenleaf & Siedzikowski, P.C., Scranton, PA, John M. Elliott, John P. Elliott, Mark J.